CVE-2026-54354

HIGHPre-NVD 8.28.2
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

This high-severity CVE scores 8.2 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.7% (52nd percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.

Triggered by: Headline CVSS from a secondary CVSS source
Sources: EPSS, a secondary CVSS source

Also known asEUVD-2026-82431 (ENISA EUVD)Source: ENISA EUVD

8.2EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.7%CVSS: 8.2Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

MapServer is a system for developing web-based GIS applications. Prior to 8.6.4, MapServer's PostGIS runtime filter translation in src/mappostgis.cpp and msPostGISLayerTranslateFilter() treats a filteritem as numeric when CONNECTIONTYPE POSTGIS and metadata such as gml__type=Integer are configured, but it does not verify that attacker-controlled CGI qstring or OGC API Features featureId input is a numeric literal. The unquoted input is concatenated into the generated PostgreSQL/PostGIS predicate, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker with access to an affected query endpoint to bypass predicates, enumerate unintended records, perform boolean-based or time-based SQL injection, and increase database load. The issue does not by itself establish database modification capabilities. This issue is fixed in version 8.6.4.

CVSS v3
8.2
EG Score
8.2HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
52
EG Risk 52/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity82% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 8.2 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.7% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
0.7%
EPSS %ILE
52nd
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (8.2): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 8.2 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
8.2 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.a secondary CVSS source · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
EG Likelihood
0.7% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-31). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

September 17, 2026

Last Modified

September 24, 2026

Advisory Details (6)

Auto-updated Sep 17, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github_release, github, github_pr, github_commit.
Web page

MapServer 8.6 Changelog — MapServer 8.6.6 documentation

https://mapserver.org/development/changelog/changelog-8-6.html#changelog-8-6
GitHub release Patch Available

MapServer 8.6.4

Patch available: MapServer/MapServer rel-8-6-4

https://github.com/MapServer/MapServer/releases/tag/rel-8-6-4
GitHub commit

commit bd59d49779d2 (MapServer/MapServer)

Fix landed in MapServer/MapServer commit bd59d49779d2 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/MapServer/MapServer/commit/bd59d49779d2ecc64ca8dc1281c53231a50b698e
GitHub commit Patch Available

commit 65f1b53c258d (MapServer/MapServer)

Patch available: MapServer/MapServer rel-8-6-4 (contains commit 65f1b53c258d)

https://github.com/MapServer/MapServer/commit/65f1b53c258df2abdf6ce1f437c29e75e9976247
GitHub pull request

PostGIS: make sure identifier value is numeric when the declared type is numeric too

Fix merged in MapServer/MapServer PR #7516 on 2026-05-31 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/MapServer/MapServer/pull/7516
GitHub advisoryMentions a patch (unverified)

MapServer 8.6.3: PostGIS Numeric Filter Value SQL Injection in MapServer Runtime Query Translation · Advisory · MapServer/MapServer · GitHub

https://github.com/MapServer/MapServer/security/advisories/GHSA-xp29-8wp5-wc3p

Affected Packages

(3 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
mapserver8.0.0-3 ... 8.6.6-1~bpo13+1 (53 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
mapserver8.4.0-4 ... 8.6.6-1~bpo13+1 (23 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
mapserver8.4.0-4 ... 8.6.4-1~bpo13+1 (16 versions)
  • every version up to 8.6.4-1: fixed in 8.6.4-1
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 8× in last 7d / 45× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

  1. 2026-11-03 16:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  2. 2026-11-02 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  3. 2026-11-01 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  4. 2026-11-01 10:51 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-31 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  6. 2026-10-30 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  7. 2026-10-29 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  8. 2026-10-28 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  9. 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  10. 2026-10-26 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  11. 2026-10-25 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  12. 2026-10-25 14:19 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-24 19:34 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  15. 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  16. 2026-10-22 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  17. 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  18. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  19. 2026-10-19 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  20. 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  21. 2026-10-18 03:31 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-10-17 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  23. 2026-10-17 04:19 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-10-16 16:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  25. 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
Show 56 more
  1. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  2. 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  3. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  4. 2026-10-12 15:56 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-11 19:39 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-11 16:54 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-11 14:01 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  9. 2026-10-10 23:33 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  11. 2026-10-09 21:59 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  13. 2026-10-08 20:26 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-08 17:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  15. 2026-10-08 06:50 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  17. 2026-10-07 03:48 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  19. 2026-10-06 02:16 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  21. 2026-10-05 00:33 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  23. 2026-10-03 23:01 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  25. 2026-10-02 21:29 UTCEG score recompute
  26. 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  27. 2026-10-01 19:53 UTCEG score recompute
  28. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  29. 2026-09-30 18:22 UTCEG score recompute
  30. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  31. 2026-09-29 16:50 UTCEG score recompute
  32. 2026-09-29 15:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  33. 2026-09-29 03:39 UTCEG score recompute
  34. 2026-09-28 14:51 UTCEG score recompute
  35. 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  36. 2026-09-28 02:05 UTCEG score recompute
  37. 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  38. 2026-09-27 00:32 UTCEG score recompute
  39. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  40. 2026-09-26 11:46 UTCEG score recompute
  41. 2026-09-24 21:24 UTCEG score recompute
  42. 2026-09-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  43. 2026-09-23 23:09 UTCEG score recompute
  44. 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  45. 2026-09-22 21:36 UTCEG score recompute
  46. 2026-09-22 08:51 UTCEG score recompute
  47. 2026-09-21 07:17 UTCEG score recompute
  48. 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  49. 2026-09-19 16:58 UTCEG score recompute
  50. 2026-09-19 04:11 UTCEG score recompute
  51. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  52. 2026-09-18 15:26 UTCEG score recompute
  53. 2026-09-18 14:54 UTCEG score recompute
  54. 2026-09-17 21:20 UTCEG score recompute
  55. 2026-09-17 20:34 UTCEG score recomputeFirst assessed: 8.2 HIGH
  56. 2026-09-17 20:34 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-54354?
CVE-2026-54354 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on September 17, 2026. MapServer is a system for developing web-based GIS applications. Prior to 8.6.4, MapServer's PostGIS runtime filter translation in src/mappostgis.cpp and msPostGISLayerTranslateFilter() treats a filteritem as numeric when CONNECTIONTYPE POSTGIS and metadata such as gml_<item>_type=Integer are…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-54354 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-54354 was published on September 17, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of September 24, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-54354 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-54354 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.7% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (52nd percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-54354?
CVE-2026-54354 has a CVSS base score of 8.2 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-54354?
A fix for CVE-2026-54354 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-54354

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-54354?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.