Guzzle Services provides an implementation of the Guzzle Command library that uses Guzzle service descriptions to describe web services, serialize requests, and parse responses into easy to use model structures. Versions prior ro 1.5.4 do not safely serialize scalar XML element values containing the CDATA terminator ]]>. The XML request serializer writes values containing <, >, or & with XMLWriter::writeCData($value). If attacker-controlled input contains ]]>, the CDATA section closes early and the remainder is interpreted as XML markup. This is an outgoing request-body integrity issue, not a response parsing issue. The attacker does not need to control the service description or schema. Users are affected when all of the following are true: the application uses guzzlehttp/guzzle-services to serialize outgoing requests; a request parameter or additionalParameters schema uses location: xml; the value is serialized as XML element text, not an XML attribute; the value can contain attacker-controlled, user-controlled, tenant-controlled, or otherwise untrusted input; the value is not constrained by a safe enum, pattern, or custom filter that excludes ]]>; and the downstream service parses the generated XML structurally and may act on unexpected, duplicated, or injected elements. Applications that serialize untrusted input into location: xml request parameters can emit XML containing attacker-controlled elements outside the intended text node. Depending on the receiving service, this can alter operation semantics, smuggle privileged fields, bypass modeled parameter boundaries, or create conflicting duplicated elements. Fixed service descriptions are sufficient if they contain an XML element parameter populated from attacker-controlled input. Users are not directly affected if they only use Guzzle Services to deserialize HTTP response bodies. Response XML parsing uses the response XML location visitor and does not invoke the vulnerable request XML serializer. Response bodies matter only in a second-order flow, such as parsing attacker-controlled response XML, storing or forwarding a parsed string value, and later using it as a location: xml request parameter. The issue is patched in 1.5.3 and later by safely splitting embedded CDATA terminators before serialization. The fix preserves the original scalar value as XML text and prevents injected nodes. As a workaround, constrain attacker-controlled XML element values with a strict enum, pattern, or custom filter that excludes ]]>, or avoid serializing untrusted data into location: xml element text until patched. Where appropriate for the service schema, XML attributes are not affected because they are written with XMLWriter attribute APIs rather than CDATA sections. To determine whether action is needed, search service descriptions for request parameters using location: xml, including operation parameters and additionalParameters. Response-only models are not directly affected unless parsed values are reused for request serialization. For object and array parameters, review nested scalar properties because leaf element values can still be affected.
CVE-2026-53723
“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.
Score 5.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: MODERATE) published 2026-06-11. A secondary CVSS source baseline 5.8; sources differ by 0.0.
Also known asEUVD-2026-36242 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-q8r6-5hfw-5jff (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD
- Lower severity and no public exploit yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 5.8
- EG Score
- 5.8MEDIUMmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 41EG Risk 41/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity58% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 5.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation0.2% × 40%FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.Automatability100% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high. - EPSS PROB
- 0.2%
- EPSS %ILE
- 12th
- KEV
- Not listed
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (5.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 5.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 5.8 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-31). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
June 11, 2026
Last Modified
October 25, 2026
Advisory Details (1)
Auto-updated Jun 13, 2026XML Injection via CDATA Terminator in guzzlehttp/guzzle-services XML Request Serialization · Advisory · guzzle/guzzle-services · GitHub
https://github.com/guzzle/guzzle-services/security/advisories/GHSA-q8r6-5hfw-5jffVendor Advisories for CVE-2026-53723(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Patch Availability(1)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fix (by version range) / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| composer | guzzlehttp/guzzle-services @ 1.5.4 (fixes < 1.5.4) | — | ghsa |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Packagist(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| guzzlehttp/guzzle-services | 0.1.0 ... 1.5.3 (24 versions) |
| — |
Weakness Classification(2)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 9× in last 7d / 40× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 100 of 185 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 85 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-11-02 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
- 2026-11-01 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
- 2026-11-01 07:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q8r6-5hfw-5jff · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 5.8
- 2026-11-01 07:45 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-31 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
- 2026-10-30 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
- 2026-10-29 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
- 2026-10-28 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
- 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
- 2026-10-26 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
- 2026-10-25 23:35 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-25 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
- 2026-10-25 14:20 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 27th percentile
- 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 27th percentile
- 2026-10-22 21:47 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-22 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 27th percentile
- 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
- 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
- 2026-10-19 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
- 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
- 2026-10-18 03:31 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
- 2026-10-16 16:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
- 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
Show 75 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
- 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
- 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
- 2026-10-12 15:57 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 19:40 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 16:55 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 14:18 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
- 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
- 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
- 2026-10-08 17:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
- 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
- 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 25th percentile
- 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 25th percentile
- 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 25th percentile
- 2026-10-03 08:39 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 25th percentile
- 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 25th percentile
- 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 25th percentile
- 2026-09-29 15:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 25th percentile
- 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 25th percentile
- 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 25th percentile
- 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 25th percentile
- 2026-09-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 25th percentile
- 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
- 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
- 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
- 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
- 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
- 2026-09-14 04:11 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
- 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
- 2026-09-10 09:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
- 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
- 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
- 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
- 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
- 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
- 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
- 2026-09-01 04:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
- 2026-08-31 00:05 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
- 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
- 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
- 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
- 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
- 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
- 2026-08-25 00:06 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-23 10:43 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
- 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
- 2026-08-20 17:15 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
- 2026-08-19 14:54 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
- 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
- 2026-08-16 23:18 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
- 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
- 2026-08-15 23:51 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
- 2026-08-13 22:15 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
- 2026-08-12 18:50 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-12 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
- 2026-08-11 19:23 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-11 00:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
- 2026-08-09 17:46 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-09 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
- 2026-08-08 18:20 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-08 16:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
- 2026-08-07 18:53 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-06 19:26 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-53723?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-53723 published?
Is CVE-2026-53723 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-53723?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-53723?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-53723
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-53723?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.