Fiber is an Express inspired web framework written in Go. Prior to 3.4.0, the helmet middleware in middleware/helmet/helmet.go never sets the Strict-Transport-Security response header even when HSTSMaxAge is configured because it checks c.Protocol() for https instead of c.Scheme(). This issue is fixed in version 3.4.0.
CVE-2026-53624
This medium-severity CVE scores 4.8 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.2%, top 88% of all CVEs by exploit prediction. GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).
- Lower severity and no public exploit yet
No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.
- CVSS v3
- 4.8
- EG Score
- 4.8(medium)
- EG Risk
- —
- EPSS
- 11.7%
- KEV
- Not listed
Published
July 6, 2026
Last Modified
July 15, 2026
Advisory Details (4)
Auto-updated Jul 8, 2026HSTS header never set in helmet middleware due to incorrect protocol check in gofiber/fiber · Advisory · gofiber/fiber · GitHub
https://github.com/gofiber/fiber/security/advisories/GHSA-gv83-gqw6-9j2cv3.4.0
Patch available: gofiber/fiber v3.4.0
https://github.com/gofiber/fiber/releases/tag/v3.4.0🐛 bug: Use Scheme() for HTTPS detection and validate Helmet HSTS configuration
Patch available: gofiber/fiber v3.4.0 (PR #4389 merged 2026-06-02)
https://github.com/gofiber/fiber/pull/4389commit 04dd4e7754f6 (gofiber/fiber)
Patch available: gofiber/fiber v3.4.0 (contains commit 04dd4e7754f6)
https://github.com/gofiber/fiber/commit/04dd4e7754f61768fddccacc79057e416f13e6bfVendor Advisories for CVE-2026-53624(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Affected Packages
(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Go(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| github.com/gofiber/fiber | — | 3.4.0 | — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 8× in last 7d / 21× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-07-22 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-21 15:25 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-20 17:08 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-19 14:31 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-19 14:31 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-19 02:29 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-18 10:04 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-16 17:03 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-15 02:00 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-15 02:00 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-13 22:31 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-13 06:13 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-13 06:13 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-12 05:46 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-11 08:27 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-11 08:27 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-09 19:10 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-09 19:10 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-06 21:36 UTCEG score recompute
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Same CWE
10 shownCWE-319
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-53624?
When was CVE-2026-53624 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-53624 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-53624?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-53624?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-53624
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-53624?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.