CVE-2026-53435

HIGHPre-NVD 8.88.9
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

“▲” beside the score: it is higher than the CVSS score beside it.

Score elevated to 8.9 because EPSS predicted 53% probability of exploitation within the next 30 days (98th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs) when EchelonGraph scored this CVE. CISA-ADP (Vulnrichment) CVSS v3.1 baseline 8.8 retained for reference (NVD's own analysis pending). Confidence: see factors.

Triggered by: EPSS exploit prediction (continuous uplift above 30%)
Sources: CISA-ADP (Vulnrichment) CVSS v3.1, EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory
Trending — 4 sources updated this weekElevated

Also known asEUVD-2026-36019 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-g2xq-2v27-4rh3 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

8.9EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • 776 internet-facing services (distinct ip:port) on record running an affected version — derived from Shodan data (© Shodan); a patched service can stay counted while its port stays open
  • High exploitation likelihood — EPSS 53%
  • Public exploit or proof-of-concept code is available
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 53%CVSS: 8.8Exploit: Public PoCExposed services: 776

A fix is available — apply it.

In Jenkins 2.567 and earlier, LTS 2.555.2 and earlier, it is possible for attackers to have Jenkins deserialize arbitrary types defined in Jenkins core or plugins from an attacker-controlled config.xml submission in a way that allows them to handle HTTP requests afterwards. This can be used to impersonate any user and send HTTP requests on their behalf, up to and including use of the Script Console to run arbitrary code, or to read arbitrary files from the Jenkins controller.

Internet exposure · derived from Shodan data

776 internet-facing services (distinct ip:port) on record running a version that maps to CVE-2026-53435, in our KEV-Exposure radar’s Shodan-derived sample.

across 48 countries (United States, China, Germany, India, Korea, Republic of)top: jenkins
See the KEV-Exposure radar →Derived from Shodan data. Shodan data is owned by Shodan, which holds its copyright (© Shodan). EchelonGraph claims no ownership of it or copyright in it. Aggregate, host-redacted.

How it counts: every 12 hours, when Shodan query credits allow, the radar runs one Shodan query per tracked product, reads up to 100 ip:port services per query, and keeps a service when its banner version matches a CISA-KEV or high-EPSS CVE; a service is dropped when neither a search nor a Shodan InternetDB port re-check has refreshed it for 21 days. A re-check that finds the port still listed by Shodan InternetDB refreshes the service without re-reading the banner, so a patched service can stay counted while its port stays open. A count is a banner-version inference over a sample, not an exploit test and not an internet-wide census, and the unit is a service, not a machine: a machine answering on two ports counts twice.

CVSS v3
8.8
EG Score
8.9HIGHhigh confidence
EG Risk
61
EG Risk 61/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity88% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 8.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation53% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
53%
EPSS %ILE
98th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (8.9): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 8.9 is EPSS's lift toward 9.0 from its impact severity (EG Severity, CVSS 8.8 HIGH): a likelihood of exploitation, not impact.

EG Severity
8.8 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
53% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-01). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

June 10, 2026

Last Modified

October 26, 2026

Advisory Details (1)

Auto-updated Jun 10, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

Jenkins Security Advisory 2026-06-10

https://www.jenkins.io/security/advisory/2026-06-10/#SECURITY-3707

Patch Availability(13)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
redhatocp-tools-4/jenkins-rhel8:17866286672026-08-26redhat
redhatocp-tools-4/jenkins-rhel9:17871253112026-08-26redhat
redhatocp-tools-4/jenkins-rhel9:17871246322026-08-26redhat
redhatocp-tools-4/jenkins-rhel8:17866286812026-08-26redhat
redhatocp-tools-4/jenkins-rhel9:17871251662026-08-26redhat
redhatocp-tools-4/jenkins-rhel9:17871249252026-08-26redhat
redhatocp-tools-4/jenkins-rhel9:17871247792026-08-26redhat
redhatocp-tools-4/jenkins-rhel8:17865335612026-08-26redhat
redhatocp-tools-4/jenkins-rhel8:17865335652026-08-26redhat
redhatocp-tools-4/jenkins-rhel9:17871250692026-08-26redhat
redhatocp-tools-4/jenkins-rhel9:17871246352026-08-26redhat
mavenorg.jenkins-ci.main:jenkins-core @ 2.555.3 (fixes < 2.555.3)—ghsa
mavenorg.jenkins-ci.main:jenkins-core @ 2.568 (fixes >= 2.556, < 2.568)—ghsa

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Maven(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
org.jenkins-ci.main:jenkins-core2.556 ... 2.567 (12 versions)
  • every version up to 2.555.3: fixed in 2.555.3
  • 2.556 up to 2.568: fixed in 2.568
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 8× in last 7d / 44× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 283 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 183 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-02 07:15 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-11-02 07:15 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-11-02 07:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g2xq-2v27-4rh3 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  4. 2026-10-31 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 53% · 98th percentile
  5. 2026-10-30 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 53% · 98th percentile
  6. 2026-10-29 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 53% · 98th percentile
  7. 2026-10-28 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 53% · 98th percentile
  8. 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 53% · 98th percentile
  9. 2026-10-26 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 53% · 98th percentile
  10. 2026-10-26 11:29 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-25 16:36 UTCEG score recompute▲ 0.10
  12. 2026-10-25 16:36 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-10-25 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 53% · 98th percentile
  14. 2026-10-25 14:20 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 82nd percentile
  16. 2026-10-24 05:07 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-10-24 05:07 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 82nd percentile
  19. 2026-10-22 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 82nd percentile
  20. 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 82nd percentile
  21. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 81st percentile
  22. 2026-10-19 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 81st percentile
  23. 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 81st percentile
  24. 2026-10-18 03:31 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-10-17 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 81st percentile
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-17 09:22 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-17 09:22 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-10-16 16:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 81st percentile
  4. 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 81st percentile
  5. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 81st percentile
  6. 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 81st percentile
  7. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 81st percentile
  8. 2026-10-12 15:57 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-10-11 19:40 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-11 16:55 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-11 14:19 UTCEG score recompute▼ 0.10
  12. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 81st percentile
  13. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 81st percentile
  14. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 81st percentile
  15. 2026-10-08 17:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 81st percentile
  16. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 81st percentile
  17. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 81st percentile
  18. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 81st percentile
  19. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 81st percentile
  20. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 81st percentile
  21. 2026-10-03 09:09 UTCOSV refresh
  22. 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 81st percentile
  23. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 81st percentile
  24. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 81st percentile
  25. 2026-09-29 15:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 81st percentile
  26. 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 81st percentile
  27. 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 81st percentile
  28. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 81st percentile
  29. 2026-09-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 81st percentile
  30. 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 53% · 98th percentile
  31. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 53% · 98th percentile
  32. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 53% · 98th percentile
  33. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 53% · 98th percentile
  34. 2026-09-14 04:17 UTCEG score recompute
  35. 2026-09-14 04:17 UTCVendor advisory
  36. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 53% · 98th percentile
  37. 2026-09-10 09:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 53% · 98th percentile
  38. 2026-09-09 12:38 UTCVendor advisory
  39. 2026-09-07 12:34 UTCEG score recompute
  40. 2026-09-07 12:34 UTCVendor advisory
  41. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 53% · 98th percentile
  42. 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 53% · 98th percentile
  43. 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 53% · 98th percentile
  44. 2026-09-01 04:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 53% · 98th percentile
  45. 2026-08-31 00:19 UTCEG score recompute▲ 0.10
  46. 2026-08-31 00:19 UTCVendor advisory
  47. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 53% · 98th percentile
  48. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 53% · 98th percentile
  49. 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 53% · 98th percentile
  50. 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 44% · 98th percentile
  51. 2026-08-27 13:34 UTCVendor advisory
  52. 2026-08-27 13:01 UTCVendor advisory
  53. 2026-08-26 16:22 UTCEG score recompute
  54. 2026-08-26 16:22 UTCVendor advisory
  55. 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 38% · 98th percentile
  56. 2026-08-26 12:19 UTCEG score recompute
  57. 2026-08-26 12:19 UTCVendor advisory
  58. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 38% · 98th percentile
  59. 2026-08-25 00:26 UTCEG score recompute
  60. 2026-08-23 10:48 UTCEG score recompute
  61. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 19% · 97th percentile
  62. 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 19% · 97th percentile
  63. 2026-08-21 10:47 UTCEG score recompute
  64. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 19% · 97th percentile
  65. 2026-08-20 08:53 UTCEG score recompute
  66. 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 19% · 97th percentile
  67. 2026-08-19 14:59 UTCEG score recompute
  68. 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 19% · 97th percentile
  69. 2026-08-16 23:39 UTCEG score recompute
  70. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 19% · 97th percentile
  71. 2026-08-16 05:54 UTCEG score recompute
  72. 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 19% · 97th percentile
  73. 2026-08-15 04:01 UTCEG score recompute
  74. 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 19% · 97th percentile
  75. 2026-08-14 02:06 UTCEG score recompute

Publicly available exploits

(1 reference)

Public exploit code is referenced for this CVE (1 GitHub PoC). Defenders should treat patch urgency accordingly.

  • GitHub PoCAmesianX/CVE-2026-53435
    Published Jun 12, 2026

    An offensive security researcher + an AI vs. a fresh n-day: building the first public PoC for CVE-2026-53435 in one Friday night. Raw 8h20m log inside.

    Open source ↗

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-53435?
CVE-2026-53435 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on June 10, 2026. In Jenkins 2.567 and earlier, LTS 2.555.2 and earlier, it is possible for attackers to have Jenkins deserialize arbitrary types defined in Jenkins core or plugins from an attacker-controlled config.xml submission in a way that allows them to handle HTTP requests afterwards. This can be used to…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-53435 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-53435 was published on June 10, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 26, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-53435 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-53435 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 53% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (98th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-53435?
CVE-2026-53435 has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 8.8 (CISA-ADP / Vulnrichment enrichment; NVD's own analysis pending). EchelonGraph synthesises CISA-ADP (Vulnrichment) CVSS v3.1 + FIRST EPSS + GHSA into a combined EG score of 8.9 (HIGH).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-53435?
A fix for CVE-2026-53435 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-53435 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-53435

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-53435?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.