CVE-2026-53267

HIGHPre-NVD 7.87.8
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

Score 7.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-06-25. a secondary CVSS source baseline 7.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, secondary
7.8
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS: 0%CVSS: 7.8Exploit: NoneExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

netfilter: nft_ct: bail out on template ct in get eval

I noticed this issue while looking at a historic syzbot report [1].

A rule like the one below is enough to trigger the bug:

table ip t { chain pre { type filter hook prerouting priority raw; ct zone set 1 ct original saddr 1.2.3.4 accept } }

The first expression attaches a per-cpu template ct via nft_ct_set_zone_eval() (nf_ct_tmpl_alloc -> kzalloc, tuple is all zero, nf_ct_l3num(ct) == 0). The next expression then calls nft_ct_get_eval() on the same skb, treats the template as a real ct and hits the 16-byte memcpy path. With dreg at NFT_REG32_15 this overflows past struct nft_regs on the kernel stack; with smaller dreg values it silently clobbers adjacent registers.

Reject template ct at the eval entry and in nft_ct_get_fast_eval(), mirroring the check nft_ct_set_eval() already has. Additionally, bound the address copy in NFT_CT_SRC / NFT_CT_DST by priv->len instead of by nf_ct_l3num(ct): nf_ct_get_tuple() zeroes the tuple before pkt_to_tuple() fills in only the protocol-relevant leading bytes, so the trailing bytes of tuple->{src,dst}.u3.all are well-defined zero. priv->len is validated at rule load, so the copy size is now bounded by the destination register rather than by an untrusted field on the conntrack.

[1]: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=389cf09cb72926114fce90dc85a2c3231dcb647c

CVSS v3
7.8
EG Score
7.8(high)
EG Risk
40(Track)
EG Risk 40/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity78% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS
2.1%
KEV
Not listed

Published

June 25, 2026

Last Modified

July 8, 2026

Advisory Details (5)

Auto-updated Jun 28, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

netfilter: nft_ct: bail out on template ct in get eval - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f071b0bf078146368d18e4eec386bf2ddc0ab7e0
generic

netfilter: nft_ct: bail out on template ct in get eval - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/af80f78ce984649e1698b841cd33f4fa505ad828
generic

netfilter: nft_ct: bail out on template ct in get eval - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8470f676eadeab99132708acb1a85915664d6115
generic

netfilter: nft_ct: bail out on template ct in get eval - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3027ecbdb5fdf9200251c21d4818e4c447ef78e1
generic

netfilter: nft_ct: bail out on template ct in get eval - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2e154b5f53f1b0b490c7b8b02499f90feb86b1d5

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-53267(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 10× in last 7d / 115× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 115 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-07-24 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-23 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-23 03:19 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-07-22 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-21 15:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-20 17:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-19 14:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-19 14:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-19 02:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-18 10:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-17 00:21 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-07-17 00:21 UTCGHSA enrichment
  13. 2026-07-16 17:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-16 11:17 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-07-16 11:17 UTCGHSA enrichment
  16. 2026-07-15 22:12 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-07-15 22:12 UTCGHSA enrichment
  18. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-15 09:04 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-07-15 09:04 UTCGHSA enrichment
  22. 2026-07-14 19:59 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-07-14 19:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
  24. 2026-07-14 06:55 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-07-14 06:55 UTCGHSA enrichment
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-07-13 22:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-13 17:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
  3. 2026-07-13 06:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-13 06:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-13 04:46 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-07-13 04:46 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-07-12 15:41 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-07-12 15:41 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-07-12 05:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-12 02:36 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-07-12 02:36 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-07-11 13:31 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-07-11 13:31 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-07-11 08:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-11 08:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-11 00:26 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-07-11 00:26 UTCGHSA enrichment
  18. 2026-07-10 11:21 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-07-10 11:21 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-07-09 22:15 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-07-09 22:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
  22. 2026-07-09 19:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-09 19:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-09 09:11 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-07-09 09:11 UTCGHSA enrichment
  26. 2026-07-08 20:04 UTCVendor advisory
  27. 2026-07-08 20:04 UTCGHSA enrichment
  28. 2026-07-08 15:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-07-08 15:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-07-08 06:58 UTCVendor advisory
  31. 2026-07-08 06:58 UTCGHSA enrichment
  32. 2026-07-07 17:54 UTCVendor advisory
  33. 2026-07-07 17:53 UTCGHSA enrichment
  34. 2026-07-07 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-07-07 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-07-07 04:42 UTCVendor advisory
  37. 2026-07-07 04:42 UTCGHSA enrichment
  38. 2026-07-06 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-07-06 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-07-06 15:31 UTCVendor advisory
  41. 2026-07-06 15:30 UTCGHSA enrichment
  42. 2026-07-06 02:25 UTCVendor advisory
  43. 2026-07-06 02:25 UTCGHSA enrichment
  44. 2026-07-06 02:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-07-06 02:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-07-05 13:19 UTCVendor advisory
  47. 2026-07-05 13:19 UTCGHSA enrichment
  48. 2026-07-05 02:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-07-05 02:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-07-05 00:13 UTCVendor advisory
  51. 2026-07-05 00:13 UTCGHSA enrichment
  52. 2026-07-04 11:04 UTCVendor advisory
  53. 2026-07-04 11:03 UTCGHSA enrichment
  54. 2026-07-04 06:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-07-04 06:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-07-03 21:59 UTCVendor advisory
  57. 2026-07-03 21:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
  58. 2026-07-03 08:55 UTCVendor advisory
  59. 2026-07-03 08:55 UTCGHSA enrichment
  60. 2026-07-02 19:50 UTCVendor advisory
  61. 2026-07-02 19:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
  62. 2026-07-02 06:45 UTCVendor advisory
  63. 2026-07-02 06:45 UTCGHSA enrichment
  64. 2026-07-01 17:41 UTCVendor advisory
  65. 2026-07-01 17:41 UTCGHSA enrichment
  66. 2026-07-01 15:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-07-01 04:37 UTCVendor advisory
  68. 2026-07-01 04:37 UTCGHSA enrichment
  69. 2026-06-30 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  70. 2026-06-30 15:30 UTCVendor advisory
  71. 2026-06-30 15:30 UTCGHSA enrichment
  72. 2026-06-30 02:26 UTCVendor advisory
  73. 2026-06-30 02:26 UTCGHSA enrichment
  74. 2026-06-29 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  75. 2026-06-29 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-53267?
CVE-2026-53267 is a high vulnerability published on June 25, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: nft_ct: bail out on template ct in get eval I noticed this issue while looking at a historic syzbot report [1]. A rule like the one below is enough to trigger the bug: table ip t { chain pre { type filter hook prerouting…
When was CVE-2026-53267 disclosed?
CVE-2026-53267 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on June 25, 2026, with the most recent update on July 8, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-53267 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-53267 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 2.1% percentile likelihood of exploitation in the next 30 days — higher percentiles indicate greater predicted risk.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-53267?
CVE-2026-53267 has a CVSS v3 base score of 7.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-53267?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-53267, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-53267

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-53267?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.