CVE-2026-53134

MEDIUMNVD 5.55.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2026-06-25. NVD baseline CVSS 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, nvd
Trending — 3 sources updated this week
5.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

netfilter: nft_fib: fix stale stack leak via the OIFNAME register

For NFT_FIB_RESULT_OIFNAME the destination register is declared with len = IFNAMSIZ (four 32-bit registers), but on the lookup-fail, RTN_LOCAL and oif-mismatch paths nft_fib{4,6}_eval() only writes one register via "*dest = 0". The remaining three registers are left as whatever was on the stack in nft_do_chain()'s struct nft_regs, and a downstream expression that loads the register span can leak that uninitialised kernel stack to userspace.

The NFTA_FIB_F_PRESENT existence check has the same shape: it is only meaningful for NFT_FIB_RESULT_OIF, yet it was accepted for any result type while the eval stores a single byte via nft_reg_store8(), leaving the rest of the declared span stale.

Fix both:

  • replace the bare "*dest = 0" in the eval with nft_fib_store_result(),
which strscpy_pad()s the whole IFNAMSIZ for OIFNAME (and is already used on the other early-return path), and
  • restrict NFTA_FIB_F_PRESENT to NFT_FIB_RESULT_OIF and declare its
destination as a single u8, so the marked span matches the one byte the eval writes.

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5(medium)
EG Risk
29(Track)
EG Risk 29/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity55% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
2%
KEV
Not listed

Published

June 25, 2026

Last Modified

July 7, 2026

Advisory Details (8)

Auto-updated Jul 7, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

netfilter: nft_fib: fix stale stack leak via the OIFNAME register - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/eca18feed38b3377a2ec5d1f22af1170c55d0171
generic

netfilter: nft_fib: fix stale stack leak via the OIFNAME register - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/eb8a8124484dbc3c2b543e207da39bbccb703d31
generic

netfilter: nft_fib: fix stale stack leak via the OIFNAME register - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d19ddef8c327a4773ff81f8e51027d1e0b4cf069
generic

netfilter: nft_fib: fix stale stack leak via the OIFNAME register - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ab185e0c4fb82dfba6fb86f8271e06f931d9c64c
generic

netfilter: nft_fib: fix stale stack leak via the OIFNAME register - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8c84885e9790823828bb8084736ea15769b1ac16
generic

netfilter: nft_fib: fix stale stack leak via the OIFNAME register - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/84d8f58cf28a0415413f43ba7148f7bacd4c1b6e
generic

netfilter: nft_fib: fix stale stack leak via the OIFNAME register - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6744e49fe51bfba26522acc2d0e9703cb41d8e50
generic

netfilter: nft_fib: fix stale stack leak via the OIFNAME register - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3544210609f6d1db282bbdeca639104ef624c393

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-53134(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 9× in last 7d / 55× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-07-26 15:15 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-07-26 15:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
  3. 2026-07-26 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-25 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-24 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-23 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-23 03:19 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-07-22 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-21 15:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-20 17:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-19 02:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-18 10:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-16 17:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-16 11:12 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-15 12:22 UTCGHSA enrichment
  18. 2026-07-15 02:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-15 02:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-14 13:31 UTCGHSA enrichment
  21. 2026-07-13 22:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-13 14:42 UTCGHSA enrichment
  23. 2026-07-13 06:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-13 06:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-07-12 15:52 UTCGHSA enrichment
Show 34 more
  1. 2026-07-12 05:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-11 17:02 UTCGHSA enrichment
  3. 2026-07-11 08:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-11 08:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-10 18:12 UTCEG score recompute 5.50
  6. 2026-07-10 18:12 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-07-09 19:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-09 19:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-08 15:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-08 15:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-07 18:13 UTCNVD updateCVSS v3 → 5.5 · severity → MEDIUM
  12. 2026-07-07 16:46 UTCGHSA enrichment
  13. 2026-07-07 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-07 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-06 02:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-06 02:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-05 02:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-05 02:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-04 14:14 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-07-04 06:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-04 06:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-01 15:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-01 12:53 UTCGHSA enrichment
  24. 2026-06-30 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-06-29 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-06-29 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-06-28 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-06-28 11:32 UTCGHSA enrichment
  29. 2026-06-28 04:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-06-28 04:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-06-27 03:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-06-25 10:10 UTCEG score recompute
  34. 2026-06-25 10:10 UTCGHSA enrichment

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-53134?
CVE-2026-53134 is a medium vulnerability published on June 25, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: nft_fib: fix stale stack leak via the OIFNAME register For NFTFIBRESULT_OIFNAME the destination register is declared with len = IFNAMSIZ (four 32-bit registers), but on the lookup-fail, RTNLOCAL and oif-mismatch paths…
When was CVE-2026-53134 disclosed?
CVE-2026-53134 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on June 25, 2026, with the most recent update on July 7, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-53134 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-53134 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 97.6% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-53134?
CVE-2026-53134 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-53134?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-53134, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-53134

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-53134?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.