CVE-2026-53122

MEDIUMNVD 5.55.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2026-06-24. NVD baseline CVSS 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3
Trending — 5 sources updated this week

Also known asEUVD-2026-38990 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-qcjh-44gv-7799 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

5.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.1%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

btrfs: fix deadlock between reflink and transaction commit when using flushoncommit

When using the flushoncommit mount option, we can have a deadlock between a transaction commit and a reflink operation that copied an inline extent to an offset beyond the current i_size of the destination node.

The deadlock happens like this:

1) Task A clones an inline extent from inode X to an offset of inode Y that is beyond Y's current i_size. This means we copied the inline extent's data to a folio of inode Y that is beyond its EOF, using a call to copy_inline_to_page();

2) Task B starts a transaction commit and calls btrfs_start_delalloc_flush() to flush delalloc;

3) The delalloc flushing sees the new dirty folio of inode Y and when it attempts to flush it, it ends up at extent_writepage() and sees that the offset of the folio is beyond the i_size of inode Y, so it attempts to invalidate the folio by calling folio_invalidate(), which ends up at btrfs' folio invalidate callback - btrfs_invalidate_folio(). There it tries to lock the folio's range in inode Y's extent io tree, but it blocks since it's currently locked by task A - during a reflink we lock the inodes and the source and destination ranges after flushing all delalloc and waiting for ordered extent completion - after that we don't expect to have dirty folios in the ranges, the exception is if we have to copy an inline extent's data (because the destination offset is not zero);

4) Task A then attempts to start a transaction to update the inode item, and then it's blocked since the current transaction is in the TRANS_STATE_COMMIT_START state. Therefore task A has to wait for the current transaction to become unblocked (its state >= TRANS_STATE_UNBLOCKED).

So task A is waiting for the transaction commit done by task B, and the later waiting on the extent lock of inode Y that is currently held by task A.

Syzbot recently reported this with the following stack traces:

INFO: task kworker/u8:7:1053 blocked for more than 143 seconds. Not tainted syzkaller #0 "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. task:kworker/u8:7 state:D stack:23520 pid:1053 tgid:1053 ppid:2 task_flags:0x4208060 flags:0x00080000 Workqueue: writeback wb_workfn (flush-btrfs-46) Call Trace: context_switch kernel/sched/core.c:5298 [inline] __schedule+0x1553/0x5240 kernel/sched/core.c:6911 __schedule_loop kernel/sched/core.c:6993 [inline] schedule+0x164/0x360 kernel/sched/core.c:7008 wait_extent_bit fs/btrfs/extent-io-tree.c:811 [inline] btrfs_lock_extent_bits+0x59c/0x700 fs/btrfs/extent-io-tree.c:1914 btrfs_lock_extent fs/btrfs/extent-io-tree.h:152 [inline] btrfs_invalidate_folio+0x43d/0xc40 fs/btrfs/inode.c:7704 extent_writepage fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:1852 [inline] extent_write_cache_pages fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:2580 [inline] btrfs_writepages+0x12ff/0x2440 fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:2713 do_writepages+0x32e/0x550 mm/page-writeback.c:2554 __writeback_single_inode+0x133/0x11a0 fs/fs-writeback.c:1750 writeback_sb_inodes+0x995/0x19d0 fs/fs-writeback.c:2042 wb_writeback+0x456/0xb70 fs/fs-writeback.c:2227 wb_do_writeback fs/fs-writeback.c:2374 [inline] wb_workfn+0x41a/0xf60 fs/fs-writeback.c:2414 process_one_work kernel/workqueue.c:3276 [inline] process_scheduled_works+0xb6e/0x18c0 kernel/workqueue.c:3359 worker_thread+0xa53/0xfc0 kernel/workqueue.c:3440 kthread+0x388/0x470 kernel/kthread.c:436 ret_from_fork+0x51e/0xb90 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:158 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:245 INFO: task syz.4.64:6910 blocked for more than 143 seconds. Not tainted syzkaller #0 "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. task:syz.4.64 state:D stack:22752 pid:6910 tgid: ---truncated---

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5MEDIUMmedium confidence
EG Risk
25
EG Risk 25/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity55% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 5.5 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.1% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's BOD 26-04 default: no one has published Automatable for this CVE, and CISA treats it as “no” for a CVE not in KEV.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.1%
EPSS %ILE
2nd
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (5.5): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 5.5 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
5.5 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.1% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-29). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

June 24, 2026

Last Modified

October 30, 2026

Advisory Details (4)

Auto-updated Jul 24, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

btrfs: fix deadlock between reflink and transaction commit when using flushoncommit - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b48c980b6a7e409050bb3067165db31cc6205e3e
Web page

btrfs: fix deadlock between reflink and transaction commit when using flushoncommit - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9a24f0000876b8755cf21972b41632f4d6f3dafb
Web page

btrfs: fix deadlock between reflink and transaction commit when using flushoncommit - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/73be4a08306bb84f4d5d16f62cb80e1543109ffa
Web page

btrfs: fix deadlock between reflink and transaction commit when using flushoncommit - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6f0f9c0a368aa1fe078109091322d3b0632d9380

Patch Availability(27)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntulinux-virtual-hwe-22.04-edge (6.8.0-136.136~22.04.1) @ jammy2026-10-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-oracle-lts-24.04 (6.8.0-1058.61) @ noble2026-10-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-oracle-edge (6.8.0-1058.61~22.04.1) @ jammy2026-10-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-fde-lts-24.04 (6.8.0-1062.69) @ noble2026-10-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-oem-7.0 (7.0.0-1009.9) @ resolute2026-10-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-gcp-fips-6.8 (6.8.0-1064.72+fips1) @ noble2026-10-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-raspi-realtime-6.8 (6.8.0-2050.52) @ noble2026-10-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-virtual-6.8 (6.8.0-136.136) @ noble2026-10-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-nvidia-lowlatency-64k-6.8 (6.8.0-1059.62.1) @ noble2026-10-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-fde-7.0 (7.0.0-1009.9) @ resolute2026-10-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-fips-6.8 (6.8.0-1063.71+fips2) @ noble2026-10-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-aws-lts-24.04 (6.8.0-1061.64+1) @ noble2026-10-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-lts-24.04 (6.8.0-1063.71) @ noble2026-10-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-fde-6.8 (6.8.0-1062.69~22.04.1) @ jammy2026-10-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-raspi-realtime-7.0 (7.0.0-1015.15) @ resolute2026-10-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-aws-fips-6.8 (6.8.0-1061.64+fips1) @ noble2026-10-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-xilinx-zynqmp (6.8.0.1033.34) @ noble2026-10-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-nvidia-hwe-24.04-edge (7.0.0-1016.16) @ resolute2026-10-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-nvidia-hwe-26.04 (7.0.0-2016.16) @ resolute2026-10-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-gcp-edge (7.0.0-1011.11~24.04.1) @ noble2026-10-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-edge (7.0.0-1014.14~24.04.1) @ noble2026-10-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-oracle-edge (7.0.0-1011.11~24.04.1) @ noble2026-10-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-virtual-hwe-26.04-edge (7.0.0-28.28) @ resolute2026-10-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-virtual-hwe-24.04-edge (7.0.0-28.28~24.04.1) @ noble2026-10-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-oracle-7.0 (7.0.0-1008.8) @ resolute2026-10-30ubuntu
linuxKernel @ 6.12.91 (fixes >=5.7.0)—osv
linuxKernel @ 6.6.160 (fixes >=5.7.0)—osv

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(4 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux5.10.103-1 ... 7.2~rc5-1~exp1 (496 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (358 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.38-1 ... 6.12.94-1~bpo12+1 (27 versions)
  • every version up to 6.12.94-1: fixed in 6.12.94-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.0.9-1~bpo13+1 (141 versions)
  • every version up to 7.0.10-1: fixed in 7.0.10-1
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(24)

Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 10× in last 7d / 41× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 231 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 131 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-01 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  2. 2026-10-31 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  3. 2026-10-30 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  4. 2026-10-30 13:38 UTCVendor advisory
  5. 2026-10-30 13:37 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qcjh-44gv-7799 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  6. 2026-10-30 12:33 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-30 12:33 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-10-30 12:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qcjh-44gv-7799 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  9. 2026-10-29 07:25 UTCOSV refresh
  10. 2026-10-26 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  11. 2026-10-25 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  12. 2026-10-25 14:20 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  14. 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  15. 2026-10-22 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  16. 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  17. 2026-10-21 13:52 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-10-21 13:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qcjh-44gv-7799 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  19. 2026-10-21 12:58 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-10-21 12:58 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-10-21 12:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qcjh-44gv-7799 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  22. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  23. 2026-10-18 03:32 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-10-17 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  25. 2026-10-16 16:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  2. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  3. 2026-10-14 02:24 UTCOSV refresh
  4. 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  5. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  6. 2026-10-12 15:58 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-11 19:41 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-11 16:55 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-10-11 14:19 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  11. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  12. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  13. 2026-10-08 17:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  14. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  15. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  16. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  17. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  18. 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  19. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  20. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  21. 2026-09-29 15:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  22. 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  23. 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  24. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  25. 2026-09-26 00:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  26. 2026-09-23 17:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  27. 2026-09-23 09:54 UTCEG score recompute
  28. 2026-09-23 09:54 UTCVendor advisory
  29. 2026-09-23 09:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qcjh-44gv-7799 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  30. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  31. 2026-09-18 07:49 UTCEG score recompute
  32. 2026-09-18 07:49 UTCVendor advisory
  33. 2026-09-18 07:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qcjh-44gv-7799 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  34. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  35. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  36. 2026-09-14 01:34 UTCEG score recompute
  37. 2026-09-14 01:34 UTCVendor advisory
  38. 2026-09-14 01:34 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qcjh-44gv-7799 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  39. 2026-09-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  40. 2026-09-12 16:10 UTCEG score recompute
  41. 2026-09-12 16:10 UTCVendor advisory
  42. 2026-09-12 16:10 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qcjh-44gv-7799 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  43. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  44. 2026-09-10 09:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  45. 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  46. 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  47. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  48. 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  49. 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  50. 2026-08-30 19:52 UTCEG score recompute
  51. 2026-08-30 19:52 UTCVendor advisory
  52. 2026-08-30 19:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qcjh-44gv-7799 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  53. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  54. 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  55. 2026-08-28 03:41 UTCEG score recompute
  56. 2026-08-28 03:41 UTCVendor advisory
  57. 2026-08-28 03:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qcjh-44gv-7799 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  58. 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  59. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  60. 2026-08-24 21:54 UTCEG score recompute
  61. 2026-08-24 21:54 UTCVendor advisory
  62. 2026-08-24 21:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qcjh-44gv-7799 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  63. 2026-08-23 13:34 UTCEG score recompute
  64. 2026-08-23 13:34 UTCVendor advisory
  65. 2026-08-23 13:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qcjh-44gv-7799 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  66. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  67. 2026-08-22 11:29 UTCVendor advisory
  68. 2026-08-22 11:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qcjh-44gv-7799 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  69. 2026-08-21 09:20 UTCEG score recompute
  70. 2026-08-21 09:20 UTCVendor advisory
  71. 2026-08-21 09:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qcjh-44gv-7799 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  72. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  73. 2026-08-20 07:16 UTCEG score recompute
  74. 2026-08-20 07:16 UTCVendor advisory
  75. 2026-08-20 07:15 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qcjh-44gv-7799 · GitHub CVSS 5.5

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-53122?
CVE-2026-53122 is a medium-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on June 24, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: fix deadlock between reflink and transaction commit when using flushoncommit When using the flushoncommit mount option, we can have a deadlock between a transaction commit and a reflink operation that copied an inline extent…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-53122 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-53122 was published on June 24, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 30, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-53122 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-53122 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.1% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (2nd percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-53122?
CVE-2026-53122 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-53122?
A fix for CVE-2026-53122 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-53122 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-53122

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-53122?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.