In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
bpf, sockmap: Take state lock for af_unix iter
When a BPF iterator program updates a sockmap, there is a race condition in
unix_stream_bpf_update_proto() where the peer pointer can become stale[1]
during a state transition TCP_ESTABLISHED -> TCP_CLOSE.
CPU0 bpf CPU1 close
-------- ----------
// unix_stream_bpf_update_proto()
sk_pair = unix_peer(sk)
if (unlikely(!sk_pair))
return -EINVAL;
// unix_release_sock()
skpair = unix_peer(sk);
unix_peer(sk) = NULL;
sock_put(skpair)
sock_hold(sk_pair) // UaF
More practically, this fix guarantees that the iterator program is
consistently provided with a unix socket that remains stable during
iterator execution.
[1]:
BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in unix_stream_bpf_update_proto+0x155/0x490
Write of size 4 at addr ffff8881178c9a00 by task test_progs/2231
Call Trace:
dump_stack_lvl+0x5d/0x80
print_report+0x170/0x4f3
kasan_report+0xe4/0x1c0
kasan_check_range+0x125/0x200
unix_stream_bpf_update_proto+0x155/0x490
sock_map_link+0x71c/0xec0
sock_map_update_common+0xbc/0x600
sock_map_update_elem+0x19a/0x1f0
bpf_prog_bbbf56096cdd4f01_selective_dump_unix+0x20c/0x217
bpf_iter_run_prog+0x21e/0xae0
bpf_iter_unix_seq_show+0x1e0/0x2a0
bpf_seq_read+0x42c/0x10d0
vfs_read+0x171/0xb20
ksys_read+0xff/0x200
do_syscall_64+0xf7/0x5e0
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
Allocated by task 2236:
kasan_save_stack+0x30/0x50
kasan_save_track+0x14/0x30
__kasan_slab_alloc+0x63/0x80
kmem_cache_alloc_noprof+0x1d5/0x680
sk_prot_alloc+0x59/0x210
sk_alloc+0x34/0x470
unix_create1+0x86/0x8a0
unix_stream_connect+0x318/0x15b0
__sys_connect+0xfd/0x130
__x64_sys_connect+0x72/0xd0
do_syscall_64+0xf7/0x5e0
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
Freed by task 2236:
kasan_save_stack+0x30/0x50
kasan_save_track+0x14/0x30
kasan_save_free_info+0x3b/0x70
__kasan_slab_free+0x47/0x70
kmem_cache_free+0x11c/0x590
__sk_destruct+0x432/0x6e0
unix_release_sock+0x9b3/0xf60
unix_release+0x8a/0xf0
__sock_release+0xb0/0x270
sock_close+0x18/0x20
__fput+0x36e/0xac0
fput_close_sync+0xe5/0x1a0
__x64_sys_close+0x7d/0xd0
do_syscall_64+0xf7/0x5e0
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (7.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 7.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 7.8 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 0.1% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-27). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it