joserfc is a Python library that provides an implementation of several JSON Object Signing and Encryption (JOSE) standards. In versions 1.3.4 through 1.6.5, joserfc accepts oversized RFC7797 b64=false JWS payloads without applying JWSRegistry.max_payload_length, which can lead to resource exhaustion. The normal JWS compact and flattened JSON paths reject payloads above the configured payload-size limit with ExceededSizeError. The RFC7797 unencoded payload paths do not make the same check. A valid b64=false compact or flattened JSON JWS can therefore deserialize successfully with a payload larger than JWSRegistry.max_payload_length. Applications that accept lower-trust JWS values and rely on joserfc to reject oversized token content during verification have a moderate availability risk. This issue has been fixed in version 1.6.7.
CVE-2026-48990
This medium-severity CVE scores 5.3 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.2%, top 94% of all CVEs by exploit prediction. GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).
- Lower severity and no public exploit yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 5.3
- EG Score
- 5.3(medium)
- EPSS
- 5.9%
- KEV
- Not listed
Published
June 17, 2026
Last Modified
June 23, 2026
Advisory Details (2)
Auto-updated Jun 17, 2026RFC7797 b64=false JWS payloads bypass JWSRegistry payload-size limits during deserialization · Advisory · authlib/joserfc · GitHub
https://github.com/authlib/joserfc/security/advisories/GHSA-wphv-vfrh-23q51.6.7
Patch available: authlib/joserfc 1.6.7
https://github.com/authlib/joserfc/releases/tag/1.6.7Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-48990(3)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
- RHSA-2026:43038Red Hat Product SecurityCritical
Red Hat Security Advisory: Migration Toolkit for Applications
- GHSA-wphv-vfrh-23q5GitHub Security AdvisoriesMedium
joserfc: b64=false RFC7797 JWS payloads bypass JWSRegistry payload-size limits during deserialization
- RHSA-2026:25039Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Hardened Images RPMs bug fix and enhancement update
Patch Availability(1)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fixed in / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| redhat | jaeger-main-2.19.0-1.hum1 | 2026-06-10 | redhat |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(1 across 1 ecosystem)
PyPI(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| joserfc | 1.3.4 ... 1.6.5 (13 versions) | 1.6.7 | — |
Weakness Classification(2)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 9× in last 7d / 50× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-07-22 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-21 15:25 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-20 17:08 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-19 14:31 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-19 14:31 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-19 02:29 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-18 10:04 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-16 21:14 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-16 17:03 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-15 16:58 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-14 15:23 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-13 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-13 13:50 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-13 06:13 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-12 12:17 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-12 05:46 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-11 10:43 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-11 08:27 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-10 09:09 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-09 19:10 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-09 07:35 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-08 15:16 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-08 06:01 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-07 04:06 UTCVendor advisory
Show 37 moreShow fewer
- 2026-07-06 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-06 02:23 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-06 02:05 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-05 02:30 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-05 00:32 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-04 06:31 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-03 22:57 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-02 21:23 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-01 19:50 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-01 15:07 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-30 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-30 18:16 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-06-29 16:43 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-06-29 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-29 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-28 15:08 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-06-28 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-28 04:56 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-28 04:56 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-27 13:33 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-06-27 03:08 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-24 14:05 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-23 21:33 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-23 21:33 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-21 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-21 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-19 19:26 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-19 19:26 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-17 23:17 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-06-17 23:16 UTCNVD updatefirst tracked
Related CVEs(same vendor + same CWE)
Same vendor
10 shownredhat
Same CWE
10 shownCWE-400
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-48990?
When was CVE-2026-48990 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-48990 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-48990?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-48990?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-48990
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-48990?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.