CVE-2026-48713

CRITICALPre-NVD 9.19.1
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

This critical-severity CVE scores 9.1 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.4%, top 66% of all CVEs by exploit prediction. GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).

Triggered by: NVD CVSS baseline
Sources: epss, secondary
9.1
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS: 0%CVSS: 9.1Exploit: NoneExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

Versions prior to 2.6.6 are vulnerable to prototype pollution via crafted missing-key strings when used to persist missing translation keys (e.g. via i18next-http-middleware's missingKeyHandler exposed to untrusted input). Backend.writeFile() splits each queued missing-key string on the configured keySeparator (default .) before calling the internal setPath() walker. The walker (getLastOfPath in lib/utils.js) did not guard against unsafe segments, so a key like "__proto__.polluted" was split into ["__proto__", "polluted"] and walked straight into Object.prototype, allowing an attacker to write arbitrary properties onto the global object prototype. Depending on the host application, polluted prototype properties may cause crashes, corrupted translation behaviour, configuration poisoning, or bypasses of property-based security checks. Applications are affected only if the missingKeyHandler (or another route that forwards untrusted request bodies to i18next.t(..., { ... }) with saveMissing: true) is reachable by untrusted users and the default behaviour of splitting missing-key strings on keySeparator is in use (i.e. keySeparator is not false). Apps that do not expose missing-key persistence to untrusted input are not directly affected through this attack path. This issue has been fixed in version 2.6.6. If developers using the library are unable to upgrade immediately, they should take the following precautions: do not expose i18next-http-middleware's missingKeyHandler to untrusted users (mount it behind authentication, or remove the route), disable missing-key persistence (saveMissing: false, or no backend.create implementation) when accepting writes from untrusted input, and set keySeparator: false in their i18next options to disable backend key splitting (note: this also disables nested translation keys).

CVSS v3
9.1
EG Score
9.1(medium)
EG Risk
46(Track)
EG Risk 46/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity91% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS
34.2%
KEV
Not listed

Published

June 15, 2026

Last Modified

June 17, 2026

Advisory Details (2)

Auto-updated Jun 15, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github_commit, github.
github Patch Available

Prototype pollution in i18next-fs-backend via crafted missing-key string · Advisory · i18next/i18next-fs-backend · GitHub

Affected: 2.6.4).

https://github.com/i18next/i18next-fs-backend/security/advisories/GHSA-2933-q333-qg83
github_commit

commit 3ab0448087da (i18next/i18next-fs-backend)

Fix landed in i18next/i18next-fs-backend commit 3ab0448087da — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/i18next/i18next-fs-backend/commit/3ab0448087da6935a40117f904b7457281f963f4

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-48713(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
npm(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
i18next-fs-backend2.6.6

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 7× in last 7d / 33× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-07-23 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-23 03:18 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-07-22 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-21 15:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-20 17:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-19 02:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-18 10:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-16 17:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-15 02:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-13 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-13 06:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-12 05:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-11 08:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-09 19:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-08 15:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-07 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-06 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-06 02:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-05 02:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-04 06:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-01 15:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-06-30 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-06-29 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-06-29 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 22 more
  1. 2026-06-28 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-06-28 04:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-06-28 04:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-06-27 03:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-06-24 14:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-06-23 21:33 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-06-23 21:33 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-06-21 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-06-21 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-06-19 19:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-06-19 19:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-06-17 17:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-06-16 17:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-06-15 23:45 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-06-15 23:45 UTCNVD updatefirst tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-48713?
CVE-2026-48713 is a critical vulnerability published on June 15, 2026. Versions prior to 2.6.6 are vulnerable to prototype pollution via crafted missing-key strings when used to persist missing translation keys (e.g. via i18next-http-middleware's missingKeyHandler exposed to untrusted input). Backend.writeFile() splits each queued missing-key string on the configured…
When was CVE-2026-48713 disclosed?
CVE-2026-48713 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on June 15, 2026, with the most recent update on June 17, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-48713 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-48713 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 34.2% percentile likelihood of exploitation in the next 30 days — higher percentiles indicate greater predicted risk.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-48713?
CVE-2026-48713 has a CVSS v3 base score of 9.1 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-48713?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-48713, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-48713

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-48713?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.