CVE-2026-48085

CRITICALPre-NVD 9.89.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

This critical-severity CVE scores 9.8 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.6% (48th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.

Triggered by: Headline CVSS from a secondary CVSS source
Sources: EPSS, a secondary CVSS source
Elevated

Also known asEUVD-2026-54167 (ENISA EUVD)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.6%CVSS: 9.8Exploit: No code on recordExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

OpenReception's appointment booking software provides an end-to-end encrypted appointment booking platform. Prior to version 1.0.1, a fully provisioned OpenReception instance accepts unauthenticated POST requests to /setup/create-admin-account and creates additional GLOBAL_ADMIN accounts without verifying that an admin already exists. Any unauthenticated network attacker who can submit a same-origin form POST gains full platform-level administrative control. The newly created account is is_active=true with confirmation_state=ACCESS_GRANTED and does not require completing email confirmation; the GLOBAL_ADMIN row is created active and immediately usable. Login and tenant enumeration succeed without any further interaction. This is distinct from the deployment race condition already documented on the Claiming an instance page. That documented race covers the window between deployment and first claim. The bug reported here works after the operator has properly claimed and configured the instance: the layout-level guard that protects the setup page only redirects on GET, while the default form action handler creates the user without rechecking adminExists(). Three GLOBAL_ADMIN accounts were created in succession during testing, with no rate limiting observed. Audit-specific event logging beyond standard application logs was not assessed; the standard [error] line that surfaces only when a uniqueness conflict is hit is not the same as a security event for "additional admin created post-claim". The form post is rejected for browser drive-by CSRF by SvelteKit's built-in same-origin check, but any tool that supplies a matching Origin header (curl, Burp, automated scanners, server-side proxies) bypasses this trivially. No additional preconditions exist. Users should upgrade to version 1.0.1 to receive a patch.

CVSS v3
9.8
EG Score
9.8CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
75
EG Risk 75/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity98% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation40% × 40%
EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
0.6%
EPSS %ILE
48th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
9.8 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.a secondary CVSS source · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
EG Likelihood
0.6% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-01). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track* at medium mission impactTrack at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

August 6, 2026

Last Modified

October 23, 2026

Advisory Details (2)

Auto-updated Oct 27, 2026
🔬 Proof of concept available. Patch available. Sources: github_commit, github.
GitHub advisoryMentions a patch (unverified)🟡 PoC Available

unauthenticated GLOBAL_ADMIN account creation post-bootstrap · Advisory · open-reception/appointment-booking-software · GitHub

https://github.com/open-reception/appointment-booking-software/security/advisories/GHSA-qvvq-hhpj-64rp
GitHub commit Patch Available

commit 222408af6fd4 (open-reception/appointment-booking-software)

Patch available: open-reception/appointment-booking-software v1.0.1 (contains commit 222408af6fd4)

https://github.com/open-reception/appointment-booking-software/commit/222408af6fd4bd85554a25ec8de8131bd0733797

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 14× in last 7d / 59× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 159 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 59 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-02 15:44 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-11-01 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  3. 2026-10-31 17:18 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-31 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  5. 2026-10-30 18:05 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-30 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  7. 2026-10-29 18:52 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-29 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  9. 2026-10-28 19:39 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-28 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  11. 2026-10-27 20:27 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  13. 2026-10-26 21:14 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-26 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  15. 2026-10-25 19:55 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-10-25 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  17. 2026-10-25 14:23 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-10-24 20:39 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  20. 2026-10-23 21:26 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  22. 2026-10-23 12:02 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-10-22 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  24. 2026-10-22 12:48 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-21 13:34 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  3. 2026-10-20 14:21 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-19 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  5. 2026-10-19 13:23 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  7. 2026-10-18 03:35 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-17 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  9. 2026-10-17 13:43 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-16 16:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  11. 2026-10-16 14:29 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  13. 2026-10-15 14:51 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
  15. 2026-10-14 09:20 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
  17. 2026-10-13 06:41 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
  19. 2026-10-12 16:01 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-10-11 19:44 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-10-11 16:58 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-10-11 14:23 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
  24. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
  25. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
  26. 2026-10-08 17:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
  27. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
  28. 2026-10-06 23:21 UTCEG score recompute
  29. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
  30. 2026-10-05 18:34 UTCEG score recompute
  31. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
  32. 2026-10-05 08:20 UTCEG score recompute
  33. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
  34. 2026-10-04 05:46 UTCEG score recompute
  35. 2026-10-03 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
  36. 2026-10-03 01:02 UTCEG score recompute
  37. 2026-10-02 09:36 UTCEG score recompute
  38. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
  39. 2026-09-30 22:59 UTCEG score recompute
  40. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
  41. 2026-09-29 05:51 UTCEG score recompute
  42. 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
  43. 2026-09-27 17:13 UTCEG score recompute
  44. 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
  45. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
  46. 2026-09-26 00:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
  47. 2026-09-25 04:19 UTCEG score recompute
  48. 2026-09-23 21:17 UTCEG score recompute
  49. 2026-09-23 17:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
  50. 2026-09-22 21:20 UTCEG score recompute
  51. 2026-09-22 00:52 UTCEG score recompute
  52. 2026-09-20 20:34 UTCEG score recompute
  53. 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
  54. 2026-09-19 17:32 UTCEG score recompute
  55. 2026-09-18 22:16 UTCEG score recompute
  56. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
  57. 2026-09-18 00:56 UTCEG score recompute
  58. 2026-09-17 00:56 UTCEG score recompute
  59. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
  60. 2026-09-16 06:31 UTCEG score recompute
  61. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
  62. 2026-09-15 06:43 UTCEG score recompute
  63. 2026-09-13 17:34 UTCEG score recompute
  64. 2026-09-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
  65. 2026-09-12 15:51 UTCEG score recompute
  66. 2026-09-11 18:06 UTCEG score recompute
  67. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
  68. 2026-09-11 14:29 UTCEG score recompute
  69. 2026-09-10 09:58 UTCEG score recompute
  70. 2026-09-10 09:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
  71. 2026-09-09 06:04 UTCEG score recompute
  72. 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
  73. 2026-09-07 17:49 UTCEG score recompute
  74. 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
  75. 2026-09-06 14:00 UTCEG score recompute

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-48085?
CVE-2026-48085 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on August 6, 2026. OpenReception's appointment booking software provides an end-to-end encrypted appointment booking platform. Prior to version 1.0.1, a fully provisioned OpenReception instance accepts unauthenticated POST requests to /setup/create-admin-account and creates additional GLOBAL_ADMIN accounts without…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-48085 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-48085 was published on August 6, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 23, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-48085 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-48085 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.6% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (48th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-48085?
CVE-2026-48085 has a CVSS base score of 9.8 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-48085?
A fix for CVE-2026-48085 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-48085

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-48085?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.