joi is a schema description language and data validator for JavaScript. Prior to 17.13.4 and 18.2.1, denial of service is possible via an untrapped exception in services validating user-supplied JSON or object input with recursive link() schemas. When validate() is called without try/catch in a request handler, deeply nested input can trigger an unhandled RangeError and potentially crash the process; lower-impact paths using validateAsync() or try/catch produce a RangeError instead of a structured ValidationError. This issue is fixed in versions 17.13.4 and 18.2.1.
CVE-2026-48038
This medium-severity CVE scores 5.3 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.3%, top 78% of all CVEs by exploit prediction. GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).
- Lower severity and no public exploit yet
No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.
- CVSS v3
- 5.3
- EG Score
- 5.3(medium)
- EG Risk
- 39(Track)EG Risk 39/100SSVC: Track
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity53% × 45%Exploitation0% × 40%Automatability100% × 15%Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence. - EPSS
- 22.3%
- KEV
- Not listed
Published
June 11, 2026
Last Modified
July 15, 2026
Advisory Details (4)
Auto-updated Jul 15, 2026Uncaught RangeError on deeply nested input through recursive `link()` schemas · Advisory · hapijs/joi · GitHub
https://github.com/hapijs/joi/security/advisories/GHSA-q7cg-457f-vx79fix: protect link recursion from max call stack
Fix merged in hapijs/joi PR #3113 on 2026-05-04 — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/hapijs/joi/pull/3113commit fc146a628ab9 (hapijs/joi)
Fix landed in hapijs/joi commit fc146a628ab9 — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/hapijs/joi/commit/fc146a628ab9cc250854407722d9f8738c9548e7commit 97bd51de94d5 (hapijs/joi)
Fix landed in hapijs/joi commit 97bd51de94d5 — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/hapijs/joi/commit/97bd51de94d595a2d8949eb3bec0dbdd2f8a7a74Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-48038(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Affected Packages
(1 across 1 ecosystem)
npm(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| joi | — | 17.13.4 | — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 8× in last 7d / 9× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-07-23 03:18 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-22 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-21 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-20 17:08 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-19 14:31 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-19 02:29 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-18 10:04 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-16 17:03 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-14 23:18 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-13 23:00 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-12 23:12 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-11 13:56 UTCEG score recompute
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-48038?
When was CVE-2026-48038 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-48038 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-48038?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-48038?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-48038
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-48038?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.