CVE-2026-47749

HIGHPre-NVD 7.87.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

This high-severity CVE scores 7.8 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.2% (10th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.

Triggered by: Headline CVSS from a secondary CVSS source
Sources: EPSS, a secondary CVSS source
Elevated

Also known asEUVD-2026-37138 (ENISA EUVD)Source: ENISA EUVD

7.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan mitigationNo release containing the referenced fix is confirmed: check the referenced fix and the vendor's advisory for a release that contains it; until one is applied, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation on your normal schedule at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS: 7.8Exploit: No code on recordExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is referenced (a reference tagged "Patch", often a source commit), but no release containing it is confirmed — find the release that contains it; until it is applied, mitigate (WAF / firewall / segmentation).

stable-diffusion.cpp is a pure C/C++ library for running diffusion model (Stable Diffusion, Flux, Wan, Qwen Image, Z-Image, and more) inference. Versions prior to master-584-0a7ae07 are vulnerable to heap buffer overflow in SHORT_BINUNICODE parsing for PyTorch checkpoint files. The pickle .ckpt parser in src/model.cpp contained a heap buffer overflow vulnerability in the SHORT_BINUNICODE opcode handler. The issue was caused by sign confusion on the opcode length field. A crafted .ckpt file could trigger memcpy with a very large length derived from a negative signed value, causing immediate heap corruption. Any application using affected stable-diffusion.cpp releases to load untrusted .ckpt model files could be vulnerable. A malicious checkpoint file could cause heap corruption through memcpy with an attacker-controlled length. This may lead to process crash and could potentially be leveraged for code execution depending on heap layout. The attack requires the victim or application to load a .ckpt file from an untrusted source, such as a downloaded model from a model sharing site. The issue has been resolved in version master-584-0a7ae07. If developers are unable to immediately update their applications they can work around this issue by not loading .ckpt checkpoint files from untrusted sources, and referring to trusted model sources and safer formats such as .safetensors where possible.

CVSS v3
7.8
EG Score
7.8HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
51
EG Risk 51/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity78% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 7.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation40% × 40%
EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is referenced, but no release containing it is confirmed. Check the referenced fix and the vendor's advisory for a release that contains it; until one is applied, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation on your normal schedule at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
0.2%
EPSS %ILE
10th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (7.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 7.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
7.8 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.a secondary CVSS source · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
EG Likelihood
0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-25). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track* at medium mission impactTrack at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.No released fix is confirmed on this page, but CISA's timeline does not wait for a fix's release: it starts when an agency identifies the flaw on an asset and updates the CDM Agency and Federal Dashboard, and the directive counts patching, decommissioning the system or another action as remediation. Until a fixed release is applied, mitigate as this page's verdict says. In the directive's words, “Fix on system upgrade” means that, “unless conditions change”, the vulnerability “should be remediated the next time the vulnerable asset receives a scheduled major upgrade or rebuild”: its timelines are “dynamic as facts change”, and a KEV listing shortens them.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.

A fix is referenced, but no release containing it is confirmed. Check the referenced fix and the vendor's advisory for a release that contains it; until one is applied, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation on your normal schedule at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

No released fix is confirmed on this page, but CISA's timeline does not wait for a fix's release: it starts when an agency identifies the flaw on an asset and updates the CDM Agency and Federal Dashboard, and the directive counts patching, decommissioning the system or another action as remediation. Until a fixed release is applied, mitigate as this page's verdict says. In the directive's words, “Fix on system upgrade” means that, “unless conditions change”, the vulnerability “should be remediated the next time the vulnerable asset receives a scheduled major upgrade or rebuild”: its timelines are “dynamic as facts change”, and a KEV listing shortens them.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

June 16, 2026

Last Modified

October 25, 2026

Advisory Details (3)

Auto-updated Jun 16, 2026
Fix referenced — no release confirmed yet. Sources: github_commit, github_pr, github.
GitHub advisoryMentions a patch (unverified)

Heap buffer overflow in SHORT_BINUNICODE parsing for PyTorch checkpoint files · Advisory · leejet/stable-diffusion.cpp · GitHub

https://github.com/leejet/stable-diffusion.cpp/security/advisories/GHSA-2c29-5hxg-fv9g
GitHub pull request

feat: add restricted torch legacy checkpoint loading

Fix merged in leejet/stable-diffusion.cpp PR #1443 on 2026-04-19 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/leejet/stable-diffusion.cpp/pull/1443
GitHub commit

commit 0a7ae07f948e (leejet/stable-diffusion.cpp)

Fix landed in leejet/stable-diffusion.cpp commit 0a7ae07f948e — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/leejet/stable-diffusion.cpp/commit/0a7ae07f948eff4611968a65a22bd7c7031ad74f

Weakness Classification(2)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 7× in last 7d / 37× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 165 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 65 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-01 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  2. 2026-10-31 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  3. 2026-10-30 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  4. 2026-10-29 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  5. 2026-10-28 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  6. 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  7. 2026-10-26 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  8. 2026-10-25 23:30 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-10-25 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  10. 2026-10-25 14:24 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  12. 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  13. 2026-10-22 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  14. 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  15. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  16. 2026-10-20 09:46 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-10-19 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  18. 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  19. 2026-10-18 03:35 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-10-17 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  21. 2026-10-16 16:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  22. 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  23. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  24. 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  25. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-12 15:44 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-11 19:44 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-10-11 16:59 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-11 14:23 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-11 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  6. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  7. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  8. 2026-10-08 17:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  9. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  10. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  11. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  12. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  13. 2026-10-03 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  14. 2026-10-03 07:09 UTCOSV refresh
  15. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  16. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  17. 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  18. 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  19. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  20. 2026-09-26 00:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  21. 2026-09-23 17:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  22. 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  23. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  24. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  25. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  26. 2026-09-14 03:30 UTCEG score recompute
  27. 2026-09-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  28. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  29. 2026-09-10 09:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  30. 2026-09-08 22:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  31. 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  32. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  33. 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  34. 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  35. 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  36. 2026-08-30 22:47 UTCEG score recompute
  37. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  38. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  39. 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  40. 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  41. 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  42. 2026-08-24 23:24 UTCEG score recompute
  43. 2026-08-23 09:25 UTCEG score recompute
  44. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  45. 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  46. 2026-08-21 09:46 UTCEG score recompute
  47. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  48. 2026-08-20 08:33 UTCEG score recompute
  49. 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  50. 2026-08-19 13:06 UTCEG score recompute
  51. 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  52. 2026-08-17 14:26 UTCEG score recompute
  53. 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  54. 2026-08-17 02:04 UTCEG score recompute
  55. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  56. 2026-08-16 13:48 UTCEG score recompute
  57. 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  58. 2026-08-15 13:09 UTCEG score recompute
  59. 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  60. 2026-08-14 00:09 UTCEG score recompute
  61. 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  62. 2026-08-12 23:01 UTCEG score recompute
  63. 2026-08-12 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  64. 2026-08-11 22:30 UTCEG score recompute
  65. 2026-08-11 10:15 UTCEG score recompute
  66. 2026-08-11 00:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  67. 2026-08-09 21:26 UTCEG score recompute
  68. 2026-08-09 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  69. 2026-08-08 20:55 UTCEG score recompute
  70. 2026-08-08 16:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  71. 2026-08-07 20:23 UTCEG score recompute
  72. 2026-08-06 19:51 UTCEG score recompute
  73. 2026-08-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  74. 2026-08-05 19:19 UTCEG score recompute
  75. 2026-08-05 19:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-47749?
CVE-2026-47749 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on June 16, 2026. stable-diffusion.cpp is a pure C/C++ library for running diffusion model (Stable Diffusion, Flux, Wan, Qwen Image, Z-Image, and more) inference. Versions prior to master-584-0a7ae07 are vulnerable to heap buffer overflow in SHORT_BINUNICODE parsing for PyTorch checkpoint files. The pickle .ckpt…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-47749 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-47749 was published on June 16, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 25, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-47749 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-47749 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (10th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-47749?
CVE-2026-47749 has a CVSS base score of 7.8 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-47749?
A fix for CVE-2026-47749 is referenced (a reference tagged "Patch", often a source commit), but EchelonGraph has no release containing it on record. Check that reference and the vendor's advisory for a release that contains the fix and update to it; until then, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-47749

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-47749?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.