Soft Machine is a Virtual Machine–based agentic development environment / Cloud OS. In versions 0.2.247 and prior, the workspace HTTP service that listens on 0.0.0.0:8080 inside each sm-ws-* Fly Machine exposes endpoints (/health, /file/, /archive/) without any authentication or origin check. Any host that can reach TCP/8080 on a workspace can read arbitrary files under that workspace's /workspace root and download whole project trees as tar archives. Because every workspace shares the same Fly private 6PN and resolves all peer addresses via the unauthenticated _instances.internal TXT record, every other sm-ws-* machine on the same Fly app/org is a reachable, unauthenticated attacker — the trust boundary (workspace owner ↔ everyone-else) is missing. At time of publication, there are no publicly known patches.
CVE-2026-46711
“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.
This high-severity CVE scores 8.3 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.3% (19th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.
Also known asEUVD-2026-90085 (ENISA EUVD)Source: ENISA EUVD
- CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
No fix is confirmed yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for the fix.
- CVSS v3
- 8.3
- EG Score
- 8.3HIGHmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 53EG Risk 53/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity83% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 8.3 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation40% × 40%EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.Automatability0% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: No fix is confirmed yet. Check with the vendor for a fixed release; until one is applied, restrict network exposure of the affected system on your normal schedule at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high. - EPSS PROB
- 0.3%
- EPSS %ILE
- 19th
- KEV
- Not listed
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (8.3): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 8.3 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 8.3 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.a secondary CVSS source · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
- EG Likelihood
- 0.3% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-01). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track* at medium mission impactTrack at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.No released fix is confirmed on this page, but CISA's timeline does not wait for a fix's release: it starts when an agency identifies the flaw on an asset and updates the CDM Agency and Federal Dashboard, and the directive counts patching, decommissioning the system or another action as remediation. Until a fixed release is applied, mitigate as this page's verdict says. In the directive's words, “Fix on system upgrade” means that, “unless conditions change”, the vulnerability “should be remediated the next time the vulnerable asset receives a scheduled major upgrade or rebuild”: its timelines are “dynamic as facts change”, and a KEV listing shortens them.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.
No fix is confirmed yet. Check with the vendor for a fixed release; until one is applied, restrict network exposure of the affected system on your normal schedule at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
No released fix is confirmed on this page, but CISA's timeline does not wait for a fix's release: it starts when an agency identifies the flaw on an asset and updates the CDM Agency and Federal Dashboard, and the directive counts patching, decommissioning the system or another action as remediation. Until a fixed release is applied, mitigate as this page's verdict says. In the directive's words, “Fix on system upgrade” means that, “unless conditions change”, the vulnerability “should be remediated the next time the vulnerable asset receives a scheduled major upgrade or rebuild”: its timelines are “dynamic as facts change”, and a KEV listing shortens them.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
September 30, 2026
Last Modified
September 30, 2026
Advisory Details (1)
Auto-updated Sep 30, 2026Unauthenticated workspace API exposes arbitrary file read & directory exfiltration to any peer on the Fly private network · Advisory · Soft-Machine-io/security · GitHub
https://github.com/Soft-Machine-io/security/security/advisories/GHSA-h6g6-qr45-qmrrWeakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 8× in last 7d / 46× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
- 2026-11-01 19:17 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-11-01 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
- 2026-10-31 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
- 2026-10-30 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
- 2026-10-29 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
- 2026-10-28 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
- 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
- 2026-10-26 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
- 2026-10-25 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
- 2026-10-25 14:25 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-25 04:13 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
- 2026-10-23 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
- 2026-10-22 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
- 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
- 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
- 2026-10-19 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
- 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
- 2026-10-18 03:36 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
- 2026-10-17 13:10 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-16 16:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
- 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
- 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
- 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
Show 29 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
- 2026-10-12 16:02 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 19:45 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 16:59 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 14:24 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
- 2026-10-10 20:02 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
- 2026-10-10 08:03 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
- 2026-10-08 20:04 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-08 17:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
- 2026-10-08 08:00 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
- 2026-10-06 20:01 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
- 2026-10-05 20:03 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
- 2026-10-05 08:04 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
- 2026-10-03 20:02 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-03 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
- 2026-10-02 19:59 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-01 20:00 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
- 2026-09-30 18:26 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-30 17:21 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-30 16:32 UTCEG score recomputeFirst assessed: 8.3 HIGH
- 2026-09-30 16:31 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-46711?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-46711 published?
Is CVE-2026-46711 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-46711?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-46711?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-46711
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-46711?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.