CVE-2026-45942

HIGHPre-NVD 7.87.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 7.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-05-27. a secondary CVSS source baseline 7.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, secondary
7.8
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS: 0%CVSS: 7.8Exploit: NoneExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

ext4: fix e4b bitmap inconsistency reports

A bitmap inconsistency issue was observed during stress tests under mixed huge-page workloads. Ext4 reported multiple e4b bitmap check failures like:

ext4_mb_complex_scan_group:2508: group 350, 8179 free clusters as per group info. But got 8192 blocks

Analysis and experimentation confirmed that the issue is caused by a race condition between page migration and bitmap modification. Although this timing window is extremely narrow, it is still hit in practice:

folio_lock ext4_mb_load_buddy __migrate_folio check ref count folio_mc_copy __filemap_get_folio folio_try_get(folio) ...... mb_mark_used ext4_mb_unload_buddy __folio_migrate_mapping folio_ref_freeze folio_unlock

The root cause of this issue is that the fast path of load_buddy only increments the folio's reference count, which is insufficient to prevent concurrent folio migration. We observed that the folio migration process acquires the folio lock. Therefore, we can determine whether to take the fast path in load_buddy by checking the lock status. If the folio is locked, we opt for the slow path (which acquires the lock) to close this concurrency window.

Additionally, this change addresses the following issues:

When the DOUBLE_CHECK macro is enabled to inspect bitmap-related issues, the following error may be triggered:

corruption in group 324 at byte 784(6272): f in copy != ff on disk/prealloc

Analysis reveals that this is a false positive. There is a specific race window where the bitmap and the group descriptor become momentarily inconsistent, leading to this error report:

ext4_mb_load_buddy ext4_mb_load_buddy __filemap_get_folio(create|lock) folio_lock ext4_mb_init_cache folio_mark_uptodate __filemap_get_folio(no lock) ...... mb_mark_used mb_mark_used_double mb_cmp_bitmaps mb_set_bits(e4b->bd_bitmap) folio_unlock

The original logic assumed that since mb_cmp_bitmaps is called when the bitmap is newly loaded from disk, the folio lock would be sufficient to prevent concurrent access. However, this overlooks a specific race condition: if another process attempts to load buddy and finds the folio is already in an uptodate state, it will immediately begin using it without holding folio lock.

CVSS v3
7.8
EG Score
7.8(medium)
EG Risk
40(Track)
EG Risk 40/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity78% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS
1.0%
KEV
Not listed

Published

May 27, 2026

Last Modified

June 24, 2026

Advisory Details (5)

Auto-updated Jun 4, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

ext4: fix e4b bitmap inconsistency reports - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f29709a7a3fc38f5015d850504762cdef0e151f9
generic

ext4: fix e4b bitmap inconsistency reports - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c05033cfc5c7699cd4df8d48cef94d01da755f24
generic

ext4: fix e4b bitmap inconsistency reports - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/bdc56a9c46b2a99c12313122b9352b619a2e719e
generic

ext4: fix e4b bitmap inconsistency reports - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/57e83bfbe1e412ac42daced2086f3c6f9a17bba0
generic

ext4: fix e4b bitmap inconsistency reports - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/29a07d691d282faf38c33d4b61839b89399110f9

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-45942(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 6× in last 7d / 36× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 118 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-07-25 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-24 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-23 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-23 03:16 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-07-22 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-20 17:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-18 10:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-16 17:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-15 02:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-13 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-13 06:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-12 05:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-12 01:54 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-07-09 19:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-09 00:21 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-07-08 15:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-06 02:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-04 06:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-01 15:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-01 11:34 UTCGHSA enrichment
  22. 2026-06-30 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-06-30 03:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
  24. 2026-06-29 14:28 UTCGHSA enrichment
  25. 2026-06-29 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-06-29 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-06-28 21:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
  3. 2026-06-28 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-06-28 07:26 UTCGHSA enrichment
  5. 2026-06-28 04:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-06-28 04:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-06-27 18:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
  8. 2026-06-27 06:13 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-06-27 03:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-06-26 17:12 UTCGHSA enrichment
  11. 2026-06-26 02:50 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-06-25 14:14 UTCGHSA enrichment
  13. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-06-25 01:39 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-06-24 14:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-06-23 21:33 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-06-23 21:33 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-06-21 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-06-21 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-06-19 19:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-06-19 19:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-06-17 18:54 UTCGHSA enrichment
  29. 2026-06-17 17:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-06-17 04:50 UTCGHSA enrichment
  31. 2026-06-16 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-06-16 16:11 UTCGHSA enrichment
  33. 2026-06-16 02:10 UTCGHSA enrichment
  34. 2026-06-15 17:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-06-15 13:34 UTCGHSA enrichment
  36. 2026-06-14 21:56 UTCGHSA enrichment
  37. 2026-06-14 09:21 UTCGHSA enrichment
  38. 2026-06-13 23:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-06-13 20:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
  40. 2026-06-13 03:23 UTCGHSA enrichment
  41. 2026-06-12 23:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-06-12 23:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-06-12 14:47 UTCGHSA enrichment
  44. 2026-06-12 02:11 UTCGHSA enrichment
  45. 2026-06-11 14:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-06-11 13:36 UTCGHSA enrichment
  47. 2026-06-11 00:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
  48. 2026-06-10 22:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-06-10 13:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-06-10 13:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-06-10 12:23 UTCGHSA enrichment
  52. 2026-06-09 23:48 UTCGHSA enrichment
  53. 2026-06-09 11:12 UTCGHSA enrichment
  54. 2026-06-08 22:37 UTCGHSA enrichment
  55. 2026-06-08 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-06-08 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-06-08 10:01 UTCGHSA enrichment
  58. 2026-06-07 21:25 UTCGHSA enrichment
  59. 2026-06-07 15:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-06-07 15:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-06-07 08:50 UTCGHSA enrichment
  62. 2026-06-06 20:14 UTCGHSA enrichment
  63. 2026-06-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-06-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-06-06 07:38 UTCGHSA enrichment
  66. 2026-06-05 22:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-06-05 19:02 UTCGHSA enrichment
  68. 2026-06-05 06:26 UTCGHSA enrichment
  69. 2026-06-05 06:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  70. 2026-06-05 06:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  71. 2026-06-04 17:50 UTCGHSA enrichment
  72. 2026-06-04 13:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  73. 2026-06-04 13:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  74. 2026-06-04 05:14 UTCGHSA enrichment
  75. 2026-06-03 16:38 UTCGHSA enrichment

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-45942?
CVE-2026-45942 is a high vulnerability published on May 27, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ext4: fix e4b bitmap inconsistency reports A bitmap inconsistency issue was observed during stress tests under mixed huge-page workloads. Ext4 reported multiple e4b bitmap check failures like: ext4mbcomplexscangroup:2508: group…
When was CVE-2026-45942 disclosed?
CVE-2026-45942 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on May 27, 2026, with the most recent update on June 24, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-45942 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-45942 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 1.0% percentile likelihood of exploitation in the next 30 days — higher percentiles indicate greater predicted risk.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-45942?
CVE-2026-45942 has a CVSS v3 base score of 7.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-45942?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-45942, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-45942

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-45942?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.