CVE-2026-45713

HIGHPre-NVD 7.57.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 7.5 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-05-19. A secondary CVSS source baseline 7.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, a secondary CVSS source
Trending — 3 sources updated this weekElevated

Also known asEUVD-2026-45972 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-fpxj-m5q8-fphw (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

7.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.6%CVSS: 7.5Exploit: No code on recordExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

Mailpit is an email testing tool and API for developers. Prior to version 1.30.0, the Mailpit SMTP server has a Server.MaxSize int field that controls the maximum allowed DATA payload size, but the field is never assigned anywhere outside test code, leaving it at Go's zero value (0 ⇒ "no limit"). The same applies to the HTTP /api/v1/send endpoint, whose request body is decoded with json.NewDecoder(r.Body) and no http.MaxBytesReader. Because Mailpit's default listeners bind [::]:1025 (SMTP) and [::]:8025 (HTTP), with no authentication required on either, a single network-reachable attacker can push an arbitrarily large message into Mailpit and watch RAM consumption spike with a ~7-10× amplification factor (raw frame → enmime envelope tree → search-text index → zstd-encoded write to SQLite). Repeating the attack — or running it concurrently from multiple connections — drives the process to OOM-kill. Version 1.30.0 contains a patch.

CVSS v3
7.5
EG Score
7.5HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
65
EG Risk 65/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity75% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 7.5 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation40% × 40%
EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
0.6%
EPSS %ILE
49th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (7.5): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 7.5 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
7.5 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.6% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-31). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

May 19, 2026

Last Modified

October 24, 2026

Advisory Details (2)

Auto-updated Jul 20, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github_release, github.
GitHub advisoryMentions a patch (unverified)

Unauthenticated remote memory-exhaustion DoS via unlimited SMTP DATA and /api/v1/send body sizes · Advisory · axllent/mailpit · GitHub

https://github.com/axllent/mailpit/security/advisories/GHSA-fpxj-m5q8-fphw
GitHub release Patch Available

Release v1.30.0 (axllent/mailpit)

Patch available: axllent/mailpit v1.30.0

https://github.com/axllent/mailpit/releases/tag/v1.30.0

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-45713(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(1)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
gogithub.com/axllent/mailpit @ 1.30.0 (fixes < 1.30.0)—ghsa

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Go(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
github.com/axllent/mailpit—
  • every version up to 1.30.0: fixed in 1.30.0
—

Weakness Classification(2)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 10× in last 7d / 40× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 124 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 24 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-01 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  2. 2026-11-01 07:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-fpxj-m5q8-fphw · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  3. 2026-11-01 07:48 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-11-01 02:58 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-31 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  6. 2026-10-30 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  7. 2026-10-29 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  8. 2026-10-28 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  9. 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  10. 2026-10-26 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  11. 2026-10-25 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  12. 2026-10-25 14:26 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-24 20:27 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  15. 2026-10-23 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  16. 2026-10-22 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  17. 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  18. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  19. 2026-10-20 09:48 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-10-19 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  21. 2026-10-18 03:37 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-10-17 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  23. 2026-10-16 16:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  24. 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  25. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  2. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  3. 2026-10-12 15:44 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-11 19:46 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-11 17:00 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-11 14:26 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-11 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  8. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  9. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  10. 2026-10-08 17:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  11. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  12. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  13. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  14. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  15. 2026-10-03 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  16. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  17. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  18. 2026-09-30 03:39 UTCOSV refresh
  19. 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
  20. 2026-09-26 15:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
  21. 2026-09-23 17:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  22. 2026-09-20 20:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  23. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  24. 2026-09-17 19:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  25. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  26. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  27. 2026-09-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  28. 2026-09-12 15:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  29. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  30. 2026-09-11 09:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  31. 2026-09-11 05:53 UTCOSV refresh
  32. 2026-09-10 09:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  33. 2026-09-08 22:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  34. 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  35. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  36. 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  37. 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  38. 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  39. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  40. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  41. 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  42. 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  43. 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  44. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  45. 2026-08-23 17:01 UTCEG score recompute
  46. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  47. 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  48. 2026-08-21 23:37 UTCEG score recompute
  49. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  50. 2026-08-20 19:02 UTCEG score recompute
  51. 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  52. 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  53. 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  54. 2026-08-16 17:07 UTCEG score recompute
  55. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  56. 2026-08-16 03:34 UTCEG score recompute
  57. 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  58. 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  59. 2026-08-14 02:06 UTCEG score recompute
  60. 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  61. 2026-08-12 14:22 UTCEG score recompute
  62. 2026-08-12 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  63. 2026-08-11 13:53 UTCEG score recompute
  64. 2026-08-11 00:38 UTCEG score recompute
  65. 2026-08-11 00:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  66. 2026-08-10 00:05 UTCEG score recompute
  67. 2026-08-09 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  68. 2026-08-09 01:35 UTCEG score recompute
  69. 2026-08-08 16:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  70. 2026-08-07 18:23 UTCEG score recompute
  71. 2026-08-06 19:52 UTCEG score recompute
  72. 2026-08-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  73. 2026-08-05 21:21 UTCEG score recompute
  74. 2026-08-05 19:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  75. 2026-08-04 15:10 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-45713?
CVE-2026-45713 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on May 19, 2026. Mailpit is an email testing tool and API for developers. Prior to version 1.30.0, the Mailpit SMTP server has a Server.MaxSize int field that controls the maximum allowed DATA payload size, but the field is never assigned anywhere outside test code, leaving it at Go's zero value (0 ⇒ "no limit").…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-45713 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-45713 was published on May 19, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 24, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-45713 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-45713 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.6% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (49th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-45713?
CVE-2026-45713 has a CVSS base score of 7.5 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-45713?
A fix for CVE-2026-45713 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-45713 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-45713

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-45713?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.