CVE-2026-43503

HIGHPre-NVD 8.88.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 8.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-05-26. A secondary CVSS source baseline 8.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, a secondary CVSS source
Trending — 4 sources updated this weekWeaponized

Also known asEUVD-2026-31536 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-494p-q444-9xf7 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

8.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • Public exploit code is available (Metasploit, other public proof-of-concept code)
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 2.0%CVSS: 8.8Exploit: Metasploit · other public PoCExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

net: skbuff: propagate shared-frag marker through frag-transfer helpers

Two frag-transfer helpers (__pskb_copy_fclone() and skb_shift()) fail to propagate the SKBFL_SHARED_FRAG bit in skb_shinfo()->flags when moving frags from source to destination. __pskb_copy_fclone() defers the rest of the shinfo metadata to skb_copy_header() after copying frag descriptors, but that helper only carries over gso_{size,segs, type} and never touches skb_shinfo()->flags; skb_shift() moves frag descriptors directly and leaves flags untouched. As a result, the destination skb keeps a reference to the same externally-owned or page-cache-backed pages while reporting skb_has_shared_frag() as false.

The mismatch is harmful in any in-place writer that uses skb_has_shared_frag() to decide whether shared pages must be detoured through skb_cow_data(). ESP input is one such writer (esp4.c, esp6.c), and a single nft 'dup to ' rule -- or any other nf_dup_ipv4() / xt_TEE caller -- is enough to land a pskb_copy()'d skb in esp_input() with the marker stripped, letting an unprivileged user write into the page cache of a root-owned read-only file via authencesn-ESN stray writes.

Set SKBFL_SHARED_FRAG on the destination whenever frag descriptors were actually moved from the source. skb_copy() and skb_copy_expand() share skb_copy_header() too but linearize all paged data into freshly allocated head storage and emerge with nr_frags == 0, so skb_has_shared_frag() returns false on its own; they need no change.

The same omission exists in skb_gro_receive() and skb_gro_receive_list(). The former moves the incoming skb's frag descriptors into the accumulator's last sub-skb via two paths (a direct frag-move loop and the head_frag + memcpy path); the latter chains the incoming skb whole onto p's frag_list. Downstream skb_segment() reads only skb_shinfo(p)->flags, and skb_segment_list() reuses each sub-skb's shinfo as the nskb -- both p and lp must carry the marker.

The same omission also exists in tcp_clone_payload(), which builds an MTU probe skb by moving frag descriptors from skbs on sk_write_queue into a freshly allocated nskb. The helper falls into the same family and warrants the same fix for consistency; no TCP TX-side in-place writer is currently known to reach a user page through this gap, but a future consumer depending on the marker would regress silently.

The same omission exists in skb_segment(): the per-iteration flag merge takes only head_skb's flag, and the inner switch that rebinds frag_skb to list_skb on head_skb-frags exhaustion does not fold the new frag_skb's flag into nskb. Fold frag_skb's flag at both sites so segments drawing frags from frag_list members carry the marker.

CVSS v3
8.8
EG Score
8.8HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
66
EG Risk 66/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity88% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 8.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation65% × 40%
EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 2 (Weaponized): a constant, not a probability.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
2.0%
EPSS %ILE
80th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (8.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 8.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
8.8 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
2.0% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-28). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

May 23, 2026

Last Modified

October 16, 2026

Advisory Details (8)

Auto-updated Jun 2, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

net: skbuff: propagate shared-frag marker through frag-transfer helpers - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ff375cc75f9167168db38e0464a482d5fbc8d81d
Web page

net: skbuff: propagate shared-frag marker through frag-transfer helpers - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/fc6eb39c55e97df2f94ad974b8a5bbcd019da2c8
Web page

net: skbuff: propagate shared-frag marker through frag-transfer helpers - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/fbeab9555564a1b98e8582cd106dfe46c4606991
Web page

net: skbuff: propagate shared-frag marker through frag-transfer helpers - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9bc9d6d6967a2239aa57af2aa53554eddd640d20
Web page

net: skbuff: propagate shared-frag marker through frag-transfer helpers - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/989214c66884d70716d83dc1d0bf5e16287bf349
Web page

net: skbuff: propagate shared-frag marker through frag-transfer helpers - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/48f6a5356a33dd78e7144ae1faef95ffc990aae0
Web page

net: skbuff: propagate shared-frag marker through frag-transfer helpers - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/179f1852bdedc300e373e807cc102cd81feff196
Web page

net: skbuff: propagate shared-frag marker through frag-transfer helpers - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/12401fcfb01f53ccc63ab0a3246570fe8f3105ee

Patch Availability(27)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
redhatkernel-0:6.12.0-231.12.el10nv2026-06-30redhat
redhatopenshift/ose-rhel-coreos-9:416.94.202606051757-02026-06-18redhat
redhatopenshift/ose-rhel-coreos-9:4.21.9.6.202606030721-02026-06-11redhat
redhatopenshift/ose-rhel-coreos-9:415.92.202606030318-02026-06-11redhat
redhatopenshift/ose-rhel-coreos-9:4.19.9.6.202606031700-02026-06-10redhat
redhatkpatch-patch2026-06-09redhat
redhatopenshift/ose-rhel-coreos-9:413.92.202605271328-02026-06-04redhat
redhatrhcos-412.86.202605271418-02026-06-04redhat
redhatopenshift/ose-rhel-coreos-9:418.94.202605260517-02026-06-03redhat
redhatopenshift/ose-rhel-coreos-9:4.20.9.6.202605270908-02026-06-03redhat
redhatopenshift/ose-rhel-coreos-9:416.94.202605200242-02026-05-29redhat
redhatkernel-0:5.14.0-284.172.1.el9_22026-05-26redhat
redhatkernel-0:4.18.0-305.192.1.el8_42026-05-21redhat
redhatkernel-0:5.14.0-427.126.1.el9_42026-05-21redhat
redhatkernel-0:4.18.0-372.193.1.el8_62026-05-21redhat
redhatkernel-0:5.14.0-570.116.1.el9_62026-05-21redhat
redhatkernel-0:6.12.0-55.75.1.el10_02026-05-21redhat
redhatkernel-rt-0:5.14.0-284.172.1.rt14.457.el9_22026-05-20redhat
redhatkernel-0:6.12.0-211.8.el10nv2026-05-20redhat
redhatkernel-rt-0:5.14.0-70.180.1.rt21.252.el9_02026-05-20redhat
redhatkernel-rt-0:4.18.0-553.125.1.rt7.466.el8_102026-05-20redhat
redhatkernel-0:4.18.0-553.125.1.el8_102026-05-20redhat
redhatkernel-0:6.12.0-211.16.1.el10_22026-05-20redhat
redhatkernel-0:5.14.0-70.180.1.el9_02026-05-20redhat
redhatkernel-0:5.14.0-687.10.1.el9_82026-05-20redhat
redhatkernel-0:4.18.0-477.143.1.el8_82026-05-20redhat
linuxKernel @ 5.10.257 (fixes >=3.9.0)—osv

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(5 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux5.10.103-1 ... 5.10.92-2 (53 versions)
  • every version up to 5.10.257-1: fixed in 5.10.257-1
—
linux-6.16.1.106-3~deb11u1 ... 6.1.172-1~deb11u1 (19 versions)
  • every version up to 6.1.174-1~deb11u1: fixed in 6.1.174-1~deb11u1
—
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 6.1.99-1 (52 versions)
  • every version up to 6.1.174-1: fixed in 6.1.174-1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.38-1 ... 6.12.90-1~bpo12+1 (23 versions)
  • every version up to 6.12.90-1: fixed in 6.12.90-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.0.9-1~bpo13+1 (139 versions)
  • every version up to 7.0.9-1: fixed in 7.0.9-1
—

Weakness Classification(2)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(12)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 10× in last 7d / 54× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 354 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 254 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-01 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 80th percentile
  2. 2026-10-31 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 80th percentile
  3. 2026-10-30 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 80th percentile
  4. 2026-10-29 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 80th percentile
  5. 2026-10-29 16:26 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-29 16:26 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-10-29 16:25 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-494p-q444-9xf7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  8. 2026-10-28 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 80th percentile
  9. 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 80th percentile
  10. 2026-10-26 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 80th percentile
  11. 2026-10-25 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 80th percentile
  12. 2026-10-25 14:28 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 80th percentile
  14. 2026-10-23 21:15 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-10-23 21:15 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-10-23 21:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-494p-q444-9xf7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  17. 2026-10-23 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 80th percentile
  18. 2026-10-22 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 80th percentile
  19. 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 80th percentile
  20. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 80th percentile
  21. 2026-10-19 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 80th percentile
  22. 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 80th percentile
  23. 2026-10-18 03:40 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-10-17 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 80th percentile
  25. 2026-10-16 19:39 UTCEG score recompute
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-16 19:39 UTCVendor advisory
  2. 2026-10-16 19:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-494p-q444-9xf7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  3. 2026-10-16 18:56 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-16 18:56 UTCVendor advisory
  5. 2026-10-16 18:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-494p-q444-9xf7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  6. 2026-10-16 16:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 80th percentile
  7. 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 80th percentile
  8. 2026-10-15 02:34 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-10-15 02:34 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-10-15 02:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-494p-q444-9xf7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  11. 2026-10-15 01:36 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-15 01:36 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-10-15 01:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-494p-q444-9xf7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  14. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 80th percentile
  15. 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 80th percentile
  16. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 80th percentile
  17. 2026-10-12 16:06 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-10-11 19:48 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-10-11 17:02 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-10-11 14:28 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-10-11 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 80th percentile
  22. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 80th percentile
  23. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 80th percentile
  24. 2026-10-08 17:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 79th percentile
  25. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 79th percentile
  26. 2026-10-06 15:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 79th percentile
  27. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 79th percentile
  28. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 79th percentile
  29. 2026-10-03 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 79th percentile
  30. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  31. 2026-10-01 07:10 UTCOSV refresh
  32. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  33. 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  34. 2026-09-26 15:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  35. 2026-09-23 17:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 27th percentile
  36. 2026-09-20 20:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 27th percentile
  37. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 27th percentile
  38. 2026-09-17 19:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 27th percentile
  39. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
  40. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
  41. 2026-09-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
  42. 2026-09-12 15:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
  43. 2026-09-12 08:23 UTCOSV refresh
  44. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
  45. 2026-09-11 09:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
  46. 2026-09-10 09:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
  47. 2026-09-08 22:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
  48. 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
  49. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
  50. 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
  51. 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
  52. 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
  53. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
  54. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
  55. 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
  56. 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
  57. 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
  58. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
  59. 2026-08-24 13:30 UTCEG score recompute
  60. 2026-08-24 13:30 UTCVendor advisory
  61. 2026-08-24 13:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-494p-q444-9xf7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  62. 2026-08-24 12:25 UTCEG score recompute
  63. 2026-08-24 12:25 UTCVendor advisory
  64. 2026-08-24 12:24 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-494p-q444-9xf7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  65. 2026-08-23 16:39 UTCEG score recompute
  66. 2026-08-23 16:39 UTCVendor advisory
  67. 2026-08-23 16:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-494p-q444-9xf7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  68. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
  69. 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
  70. 2026-08-21 21:39 UTCEG score recompute
  71. 2026-08-21 21:39 UTCVendor advisory
  72. 2026-08-21 21:39 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-494p-q444-9xf7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  73. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
  74. 2026-08-20 18:36 UTCEG score recompute
  75. 2026-08-20 18:36 UTCVendor advisory

Publicly available exploits

(8 references)

Public exploit code is referenced for this CVE (1 Metasploit module, 7 GitHub PoCs). Defenders should treat patch urgency accordingly.

  • Metasploitexploit/linux/local/dirtyclone_cve_2026_43503✓ verified
    Published Sep 30, 2026

    Sample Linux Priv Esc

    Open source ↗
  • GitHub PoCentra1337/DirtyClone
    Published Jun 29, 2026

    Python Proof of Concept for DirtyClone (CVE-2026-43503) - Linux kernel LPE via page-cache corruption

    Open source ↗
  • GitHub PoCgl1tch0x1/DirtyClone
    Published Jun 28, 2026

    DirtyClone - local privilege escalation (LPE) proof-of-concept targeting a kernel/XFRM-related vulnerability described in the source as CVE-2026-43503

    Open source ↗
  • GitHub PoCdouglasmun/pagecache-lpe-containment-kit
    Published Jun 27, 2026

    Educational, defensive kit for two Linux page-cache-corruption LPEs (DirtyClone CVE-2026-43503, pedit COW CVE-2026-46331): hardening, detection, verification, seccomp + validation harness. Detection and prevention only — no exploit code. TLP:CLEAR.

    Open source ↗
  • GitHub PoCaexdyhaxor/CVE-2026-43503-DirtyClone
    Published Jun 26, 2026
    Open source ↗
  • GitHub PoCmooder1/dirtyclone-CVE-2026-43503
    Published Jun 26, 2026
    Open source ↗
  • GitHub PoC0xBlackash/CVE-2026-43503
    Published Jun 25, 2026

    CVE-2026-43503

    Open source ↗
  • GitHub PoC0xredash/CVE-2026-43503
    Published Jun 25, 2026

    CVE-2026-43503

    Open source ↗

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-43503?
CVE-2026-43503 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on May 23, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: skbuff: propagate shared-frag marker through frag-transfer helpers Two frag-transfer helpers (__pskb_copy_fclone() and skb_shift()) fail to propagate the SKBFL_SHARED_FRAG bit in skb_shinfo()->flags when moving frags from…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-43503 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-43503 was published on May 23, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 16, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-43503 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-43503 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. EchelonGraph's EG-KEV model places it in Tier 2 (Weaponized), which is not evidence of exploitation: a Metasploit module exists for it. EchelonGraph does not test whether exploit code works. FIRST EPSS estimates a 2.0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (80th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-43503?
CVE-2026-43503 has a CVSS base score of 8.8 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-43503?
A fix for CVE-2026-43503 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-43503 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-43503

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-43503?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.