CVE-2026-43456

HIGHNVD 7.87.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

Score 7.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-05-08. NVD baseline CVSS 7.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3
Trending — 4 sources updated this week

Also known asEUVD-2026-28762 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-mr89-jg5f-6pqv (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

7.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS: 7.8Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

bonding: fix type confusion in bond_setup_by_slave()

kernel BUG at net/core/skbuff.c:2306! Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN NOPTI RIP: 0010:pskb_expand_head+0xa08/0xfe0 net/core/skbuff.c:2306 RSP: 0018:ffffc90004aff760 EFLAGS: 00010293 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff88807e3c8780 RCX: ffffffff89593e0e RDX: ffff88807b7c4900 RSI: ffffffff89594747 RDI: ffff88807b7c4900 RBP: 0000000000000820 R08: 0000000000000005 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 00000000961a63e0 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff88807e3c8780 R13: 00000000961a6560 R14: dffffc0000000000 R15: 00000000961a63e0 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007fe1a0ed8df0 CR3: 000000002d816000 CR4: 00000000003526f0 Call Trace: ipgre_header+0xdd/0x540 net/ipv4/ip_gre.c:900 dev_hard_header include/linux/netdevice.h:3439 [inline] packet_snd net/packet/af_packet.c:3028 [inline] packet_sendmsg+0x3ae5/0x53c0 net/packet/af_packet.c:3108 sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:727 [inline] __sock_sendmsg net/socket.c:742 [inline] ____sys_sendmsg+0xa54/0xc30 net/socket.c:2592 ___sys_sendmsg+0x190/0x1e0 net/socket.c:2646 __sys_sendmsg+0x170/0x220 net/socket.c:2678 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x106/0xf80 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f RIP: 0033:0x7fe1a0e6c1a9

When a non-Ethernet device (e.g. GRE tunnel) is enslaved to a bond, bond_setup_by_slave() directly copies the slave's header_ops to the bond device:

bond_dev->header_ops = slave_dev->header_ops;

This causes a type confusion when dev_hard_header() is later called on the bond device. Functions like ipgre_header(), ip6gre_header(),all use netdev_priv(dev) to access their device-specific private data. When called with the bond device, netdev_priv() returns the bond's private data (struct bonding) instead of the expected type (e.g. struct ip_tunnel), leading to garbage values being read and kernel crashes.

Fix this by introducing bond_header_ops with wrapper functions that delegate to the active slave's header_ops using the slave's own device. This ensures netdev_priv() in the slave's header functions always receives the correct device.

The fix is placed in the bonding driver rather than individual device drivers, as the root cause is bond blindly inheriting header_ops from the slave without considering that these callbacks expect a specific netdev_priv() layout.

The type confusion can be observed by adding a printk in ipgre_header() and running the following commands:

ip link add dummy0 type dummy ip addr add 10.0.0.1/24 dev dummy0 ip link set dummy0 up ip link add gre1 type gre local 10.0.0.1 ip link add bond1 type bond mode active-backup ip link set gre1 master bond1 ip link set gre1 up ip link set bond1 up ip addr add fe80::1/64 dev bond1

CVSS v3
7.8
EG Score
7.8HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
35
EG Risk 35/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity78% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 7.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.2% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.2%
EPSS %ILE
8th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (7.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 7.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
7.8 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS. FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

May 8, 2026

Last Modified

October 30, 2026

Advisory Details (4)

Auto-updated May 11, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

bonding: fix type confusion in bond_setup_by_slave() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9baf26a91565b7bb2b1d9f99aaf884a2b28c2f6d
Web page

bonding: fix type confusion in bond_setup_by_slave() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/95597d11dc8bddb2b9a051c9232000bfbb5e43ba
Web page

bonding: fix type confusion in bond_setup_by_slave() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/950803f7254721c1c15858fbbfae3deaaeeecb11
Web page

bonding: fix type confusion in bond_setup_by_slave() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6ac890f1d60ac3707ee8dae15a67d9a833e49956

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-43456(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(18)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(4 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux5.10.103-1 ... 7.2~rc5-1~exp1 (496 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (358 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.38-1 ... 6.12.85-1~bpo12+1 (17 versions)
  • every version up to 6.12.85-1: fixed in 6.12.85-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 6.19~rc8-1~exp1 (123 versions)
  • every version up to 6.19.10-1: fixed in 6.19.10-1
—

Weakness Classification(2)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(16)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 15× in last 7d / 54× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 293 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 193 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-02 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  2. 2026-11-01 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  3. 2026-10-31 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  4. 2026-10-30 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  5. 2026-10-30 13:30 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-10-30 13:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mr89-jg5f-6pqv · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  7. 2026-10-30 12:31 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-30 12:31 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-10-30 12:31 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mr89-jg5f-6pqv · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  10. 2026-10-29 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  11. 2026-10-28 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  12. 2026-10-27 20:16 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-27 20:16 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-10-27 20:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mr89-jg5f-6pqv · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  15. 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  16. 2026-10-26 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  17. 2026-10-25 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  18. 2026-10-25 14:28 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  20. 2026-10-23 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  21. 2026-10-22 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  22. 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  23. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  24. 2026-10-19 20:37 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-10-19 20:37 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mr89-jg5f-6pqv · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-19 19:32 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-19 19:32 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-10-19 19:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mr89-jg5f-6pqv · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  4. 2026-10-19 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  5. 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  6. 2026-10-18 03:40 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-17 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  8. 2026-10-16 16:59 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-10-16 16:59 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-10-16 16:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mr89-jg5f-6pqv · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  11. 2026-10-16 16:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  12. 2026-10-16 15:33 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-16 15:33 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-10-16 15:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mr89-jg5f-6pqv · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  15. 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  16. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  17. 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  18. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  19. 2026-10-12 16:06 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-10-11 19:48 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-10-11 17:02 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-10-11 14:28 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-10-11 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  24. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  25. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  26. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  27. 2026-10-06 15:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  28. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  29. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  30. 2026-10-03 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  31. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  32. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  33. 2026-09-30 07:58 UTCOSV refresh
  34. 2026-09-26 15:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  35. 2026-09-23 17:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  36. 2026-09-20 20:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  37. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  38. 2026-09-17 19:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  39. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  40. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  41. 2026-09-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  42. 2026-09-12 15:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  43. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  44. 2026-09-11 14:23 UTCOSV refresh
  45. 2026-09-11 09:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  46. 2026-09-10 09:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  47. 2026-09-08 22:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  48. 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  49. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  50. 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  51. 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  52. 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  53. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  54. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  55. 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  56. 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  57. 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  58. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  59. 2026-08-23 19:01 UTCEG score recompute
  60. 2026-08-23 19:01 UTCVendor advisory
  61. 2026-08-23 19:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mr89-jg5f-6pqv · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  62. 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  63. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  64. 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  65. 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  66. 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  67. 2026-08-17 11:31 UTCEG score recompute
  68. 2026-08-17 11:31 UTCVendor advisory
  69. 2026-08-17 11:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mr89-jg5f-6pqv · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  70. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  71. 2026-08-16 04:34 UTCEG score recompute
  72. 2026-08-16 04:34 UTCVendor advisory
  73. 2026-08-16 04:34 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mr89-jg5f-6pqv · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  74. 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  75. 2026-08-15 02:18 UTCEG score recompute

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-43456?
CVE-2026-43456 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on May 8, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bonding: fix type confusion in bond_setup_by_slave() kernel BUG at net/core/skbuff.c:2306! Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN NOPTI RIP: 0010:pskb_expand_head+0xa08/0xfe0 net/core/skbuff.c:2306 RSP: 0018:ffffc90004aff760…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-43456 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-43456 was published on May 8, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 30, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-43456 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-43456 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (8th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-43456?
CVE-2026-43456 has a CVSS v3 base score of 7.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-43456?
A fix for CVE-2026-43456 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-43456 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-43456

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-43456?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.