CVE-2026-43404

MEDIUMNVD 5.55.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2026-05-08. NVD baseline CVSS 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, nvd
5.5
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS: 0%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: NoneExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

mm: Fix a hmm_range_fault() livelock / starvation problem

If hmm_range_fault() fails a folio_trylock() in do_swap_page, trying to acquire the lock of a device-private folio for migration, to ram, the function will spin until it succeeds grabbing the lock.

However, if the process holding the lock is depending on a work item to be completed, which is scheduled on the same CPU as the spinning hmm_range_fault(), that work item might be starved and we end up in a livelock / starvation situation which is never resolved.

This can happen, for example if the process holding the device-private folio lock is stuck in migrate_device_unmap()->lru_add_drain_all() sinc lru_add_drain_all() requires a short work-item to be run on all online cpus to complete.

A prerequisite for this to happen is: a) Both zone device and system memory folios are considered in migrate_device_unmap(), so that there is a reason to call lru_add_drain_all() for a system memory folio while a folio lock is held on a zone device folio. b) The zone device folio has an initial mapcount > 1 which causes at least one migration PTE entry insertion to be deferred to try_to_migrate(), which can happen after the call to lru_add_drain_all(). c) No or voluntary only preemption.

This all seems pretty unlikely to happen, but indeed is hit by the "xe_exec_system_allocator" igt test.

Resolve this by waiting for the folio to be unlocked if the folio_trylock() fails in do_swap_page().

Rename migration_entry_wait_on_locked() to softleaf_entry_wait_unlock() and update its documentation to indicate the new use-case.

Future code improvements might consider moving the lru_add_drain_all() call in migrate_device_unmap() to be called *after* all pages have migration entries inserted. That would eliminate also b) above.

v2:

  • Instead of a cond_resched() in hmm_range_fault(),
eliminate the problem by waiting for the folio to be unlocked in do_swap_page() (Alistair Popple, Andrew Morton) v3:
  • Add a stub migration_entry_wait_on_locked() for the
!CONFIG_MIGRATION case. (Kernel Test Robot) v4:
  • Rename migrate_entry_wait_on_locked() to
softleaf_entry_wait_on_locked() and update docs (Alistair Popple) v5:
  • Add a WARN_ON_ONCE() for the !CONFIG_MIGRATION
version of softleaf_entry_wait_on_locked().
  • Modify wording around function names in the commit message
(Andrew Morton)

(cherry picked from commit a69d1ab971a624c6f112cea61536569d579c3215)

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5(medium)
EG Risk
29(Track)
EG Risk 29/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity55% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS
0.7%
KEV
Not listed

Published

May 8, 2026

Last Modified

May 21, 2026

Advisory Details (3)

Auto-updated Jun 17, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

mm: Fix a hmm_range_fault() livelock / starvation problem - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b570f37a2ce480be26c665345c5514686a8a0274
generic

mm: Fix a hmm_range_fault() livelock / starvation problem - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/94b6d0ba4b640ba23bb6c708a59316e74e5ede63
generic

mm: Fix a hmm_range_fault() livelock / starvation problem - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7e6e2fc91d4b9b12ec6e137019532568ebcf2680

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-43404(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(1)

Vendor / EcosystemFixed in / PatchReleasedSource
linuxKernel @ 6.18.19osv

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 7× in last 7d / 26× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-07-24 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-23 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-23 03:14 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-07-22 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-21 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-20 17:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-18 10:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-16 17:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-16 05:23 UTCOSV refresh
  10. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-15 02:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-13 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-12 05:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-11 08:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-09 19:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-08 15:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-07 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-06 02:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-04 06:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-01 15:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-06-29 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-06-28 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-06-28 04:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-06-28 04:55 UTCGHSA enrichment
  25. 2026-06-27 03:08 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 62 more
  1. 2026-06-26 21:25 UTCGHSA enrichment
  2. 2026-06-24 14:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-06-23 21:33 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-06-21 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-06-17 17:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-06-17 01:29 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-06-16 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-06-15 17:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-06-15 04:09 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-06-14 02:50 UTCGHSA enrichment
  13. 2026-06-13 23:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-06-12 23:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-06-12 23:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-06-12 01:47 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-06-11 14:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-06-11 00:30 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-06-10 22:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-06-10 13:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-06-10 13:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-06-09 22:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
  23. 2026-06-08 20:43 UTCGHSA enrichment
  24. 2026-06-08 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-06-08 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-06-07 15:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
  27. 2026-06-07 15:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-06-07 15:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-06-06 14:10 UTCGHSA enrichment
  30. 2026-06-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-06-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-06-05 22:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-06-05 12:54 UTCGHSA enrichment
  34. 2026-06-05 06:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-06-05 06:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-06-04 13:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-06-04 13:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-06-04 11:38 UTCGHSA enrichment
  39. 2026-06-03 10:21 UTCGHSA enrichment
  40. 2026-06-02 20:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-06-02 09:04 UTCGHSA enrichment
  42. 2026-06-01 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-06-01 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-06-01 07:47 UTCEG score recompute 5.50
  45. 2026-06-01 07:47 UTCGHSA enrichment
  46. 2026-05-31 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-05-31 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-05-31 00:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-05-31 00:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-05-29 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-05-29 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-05-28 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-05-28 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-05-27 13:40 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-05-27 13:40 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-05-26 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-05-26 07:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-05-21 22:43 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-05-20 22:38 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-05-20 13:38 UTCEG score recompute
  61. 2026-05-20 13:38 UTCGHSA enrichment
  62. 2026-05-20 11:22 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-43404?
CVE-2026-43404 is a medium vulnerability published on May 8, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm: Fix a hmmrangefault() livelock / starvation problem If hmmrangefault() fails a foliotrylock() in doswap_page, trying to acquire the lock of a device-private folio for migration, to ram, the function will spin until it succeeds…
When was CVE-2026-43404 disclosed?
CVE-2026-43404 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on May 8, 2026, with the most recent update on May 21, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-43404 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-43404 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.7% percentile likelihood of exploitation in the next 30 days — higher percentiles indicate greater predicted risk.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-43404?
CVE-2026-43404 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-43404?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-43404, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-43404

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-43404?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.