In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/v3d: Set DMA segment size to avoid debug warnings
When using V3D rendering with CONFIG_DMA_API_DEBUG enabled, the
kernel occasionally reports a segment size mismatch. This is because
'max_seg_size' is not set. The kernel defaults to 64K. setting
'max_seg_size' to the maximum will prevent 'debug_dma_map_sg()'
from complaining about the over-mapping of the V3D segment length.
DMA-API: v3d 1002000000.v3d: mapping sg segment longer than device
claims to support [len=8290304] [max=65536]
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 493 at kernel/dma/debug.c:1179 debug_dma_map_sg+0x330/0x388
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 493 Comm: Xorg Not tainted 6.12.53-yocto-standard #1
Hardware name: Raspberry Pi 5 Model B Rev 1.0 (DT)
pstate: 60400009 (nZCv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
pc : debug_dma_map_sg+0x330/0x388
lr : debug_dma_map_sg+0x330/0x388
sp : ffff8000829a3ac0
x29: ffff8000829a3ac0 x28: 0000000000000001 x27: ffff8000813fe000
x26: ffffc1ffc0000000 x25: ffff00010fdeb760 x24: 0000000000000000
x23: ffff8000816a9bf0 x22: 0000000000000001 x21: 0000000000000002
x20: 0000000000000002 x19: ffff00010185e810 x18: ffffffffffffffff
x17: 69766564206e6168 x16: 74207265676e6f6c x15: 20746e656d676573
x14: 20677320676e6970 x13: 5d34303334393134 x12: 0000000000000000
x11: 00000000000000c0 x10: 00000000000009c0 x9 : ffff8000800e0b7c
x8 : ffff00010a315ca0 x7 : ffff8000816a5110 x6 : 0000000000000001
x5 : 000000000000002b x4 : 0000000000000002 x3 : 0000000000000008
x2 : 0000000000000000 x1 : 0000000000000000 x0 : ffff00010a315280
Call trace:
debug_dma_map_sg+0x330/0x388
__dma_map_sg_attrs+0xc0/0x278
dma_map_sgtable+0x30/0x58
drm_gem_shmem_get_pages_sgt+0xb4/0x140
v3d_bo_create_finish+0x28/0x130 [v3d]
v3d_create_bo_ioctl+0x54/0x180 [v3d]
drm_ioctl_kernel+0xc8/0x140
drm_ioctl+0x2d4/0x4d8
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (5.5): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 5.5 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 5.5 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 0.1% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS. FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it