CVE-2026-43244

MEDIUMNVD 5.55.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2026-05-06. NVD baseline CVSS 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, nvd
5.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

kcm: fix zero-frag skb in frag_list on partial sendmsg error

Syzkaller reported a warning in kcm_write_msgs() when processing a message with a zero-fragment skb in the frag_list.

When kcm_sendmsg() fills MAX_SKB_FRAGS fragments in the current skb, it allocates a new skb (tskb) and links it into the frag_list before copying data. If the copy subsequently fails (e.g. -EFAULT from user memory), tskb remains in the frag_list with zero fragments:

head skb (msg being assembled, NOT yet in sk_write_queue) +-----------+ | frags[17] | (MAX_SKB_FRAGS, all filled with data) | frag_list-+--> tskb +-----------+ +----------+ | frags[0] | (empty! copy failed before filling) +----------+

For SOCK_SEQPACKET with partial data already copied, the error path saves this message via partial_message for later completion. For SOCK_SEQPACKET, sock_write_iter() automatically sets MSG_EOR, so a subsequent zero-length write(fd, NULL, 0) completes the message and queues it to sk_write_queue. kcm_write_msgs() then walks the frag_list and hits:

WARN_ON(!skb_shinfo(skb)->nr_frags)

TCP has a similar pattern where skbs are enqueued before data copy and cleaned up on failure via tcp_remove_empty_skb(). KCM was missing the equivalent cleanup.

Fix this by tracking the predecessor skb (frag_prev) when allocating a new frag_list entry. On error, if the tail skb has zero frags, use frag_prev to unlink and free it in O(1) without walking the singly-linked frag_list. frag_prev is safe to dereference because the entire message chain is only held locally (or in kcm->seq_skb) and is not added to sk_write_queue until MSG_EOR, so the send path cannot free it underneath us.

Also change the WARN_ON to WARN_ON_ONCE to avoid flooding the log if the condition is somehow hit repeatedly.

There are currently no KCM selftests in the kernel tree; a simple reproducer is available at [1].

[1] https://gist.github.com/mrpre/a94d431c757e8d6f168f4dd1a3749daa

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5(medium)
EG Risk
29(Track)
EG Risk 29/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity55% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
2%
KEV
Not listed

Published

May 6, 2026

Last Modified

May 11, 2026

Advisory Details (4)

Auto-updated May 11, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

kcm: fix zero-frag skb in frag_list on partial sendmsg error - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ca220141fa8ebae09765a242076b2b77338106b0
generic

kcm: fix zero-frag skb in frag_list on partial sendmsg error - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b1e3edf688a88c1a3ac41657055d9c136a08cd25
generic

kcm: fix zero-frag skb in frag_list on partial sendmsg error - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9ea3671d70ee07480d80bebe86696397c4e99fb7
generic

kcm: fix zero-frag skb in frag_list on partial sendmsg error - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7af58f76e4b404a74c836881a845e6652db8a09f

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-43244(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(1)

Vendor / EcosystemFixed in / PatchReleasedSource
linuxKernel @ 6.12.75osv

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 9× in last 7d / 32× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-07-26 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-26 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-25 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-24 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-23 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-23 03:14 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-07-22 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-21 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-20 17:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-19 17:18 UTCOSV refresh
  11. 2026-07-19 14:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-19 02:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-18 10:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-16 17:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-15 02:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-13 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-13 06:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-12 05:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-11 08:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-09 19:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-08 15:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-07 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-06 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-07-06 02:23 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 71 more
  1. 2026-07-05 02:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-04 06:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-01 15:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-06-30 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-06-29 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-06-28 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-06-28 04:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-06-27 03:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-06-24 14:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-06-23 21:33 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-06-19 19:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-06-17 17:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-06-16 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-06-15 17:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-06-14 07:33 UTCGHSA enrichment
  24. 2026-06-13 23:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-06-12 23:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-06-12 23:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-06-12 10:04 UTCGHSA enrichment
  28. 2026-06-11 14:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-06-11 06:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
  30. 2026-06-10 22:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-06-10 13:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-06-10 13:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-06-10 04:45 UTCGHSA enrichment
  34. 2026-06-09 02:31 UTCGHSA enrichment
  35. 2026-06-08 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-06-08 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-06-07 22:55 UTCGHSA enrichment
  38. 2026-06-07 15:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-06-07 15:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-06-06 20:42 UTCGHSA enrichment
  41. 2026-06-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-06-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-06-05 22:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-06-05 18:28 UTCGHSA enrichment
  45. 2026-06-04 16:13 UTCGHSA enrichment
  46. 2026-06-04 13:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-06-04 13:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-06-03 13:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
  49. 2026-06-02 20:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-06-02 11:45 UTCGHSA enrichment
  51. 2026-06-01 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-06-01 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-06-01 09:31 UTCGHSA enrichment
  54. 2026-05-31 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-05-31 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-05-31 00:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-05-31 00:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-05-29 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-05-29 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-05-28 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-05-28 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-05-27 13:40 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-05-27 13:40 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-05-26 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-05-26 07:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-05-21 22:43 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-05-20 22:38 UTCEPSS rescore
  68. 2026-05-20 14:12 UTCEG score recompute
  69. 2026-05-20 14:12 UTCGHSA enrichment
  70. 2026-05-20 11:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  71. 2026-05-20 11:22 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-43244?
CVE-2026-43244 is a medium vulnerability published on May 6, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: kcm: fix zero-frag skb in frag_list on partial sendmsg error Syzkaller reported a warning in kcmwritemsgs() when processing a message with a zero-fragment skb in the frag_list. When kcmsendmsg() fills MAXSKB_FRAGS fragments in the…
When was CVE-2026-43244 disclosed?
CVE-2026-43244 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on May 6, 2026, with the most recent update on May 11, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-43244 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-43244 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 97.7% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-43244?
CVE-2026-43244 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-43244?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-43244, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-43244

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-43244?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.