CVE-2026-43068

MEDIUMNVD 5.55.5—
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2026-05-05. NVD baseline CVSS 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, nvd
5.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

ext4: avoid allocate block from corrupted group in ext4_mb_find_by_goal()

There's issue as follows: ... EXT4-fs (mmcblk0p1): Delayed block allocation failed for inode 206 at logical offset 0 with max blocks 1 with error 117 EXT4-fs (mmcblk0p1): This should not happen!! Data will be lost

EXT4-fs (mmcblk0p1): Delayed block allocation failed for inode 206 at logical offset 0 with max blocks 1 with error 117 EXT4-fs (mmcblk0p1): This should not happen!! Data will be lost

EXT4-fs (mmcblk0p1): Delayed block allocation failed for inode 206 at logical offset 0 with max blocks 1 with error 117 EXT4-fs (mmcblk0p1): This should not happen!! Data will be lost

EXT4-fs (mmcblk0p1): Delayed block allocation failed for inode 206 at logical offset 0 with max blocks 1 with error 117 EXT4-fs (mmcblk0p1): This should not happen!! Data will be lost

EXT4-fs (mmcblk0p1): Delayed block allocation failed for inode 2243 at logical offset 0 with max blocks 1 with error 117 EXT4-fs (mmcblk0p1): This should not happen!! Data will be lost

EXT4-fs (mmcblk0p1): Delayed block allocation failed for inode 2239 at logical offset 0 with max blocks 1 with error 117 EXT4-fs (mmcblk0p1): This should not happen!! Data will be lost

EXT4-fs (mmcblk0p1): error count since last fsck: 1 EXT4-fs (mmcblk0p1): initial error at time 1765597433: ext4_mb_generate_buddy:760 EXT4-fs (mmcblk0p1): last error at time 1765597433: ext4_mb_generate_buddy:760 ...

According to the log analysis, blocks are always requested from the corrupted block group. This may happen as follows: ext4_mb_find_by_goal ext4_mb_load_buddy ext4_mb_load_buddy_gfp ext4_mb_init_cache ext4_read_block_bitmap_nowait ext4_wait_block_bitmap ext4_validate_block_bitmap if (!grp || EXT4_MB_GRP_BBITMAP_CORRUPT(grp)) return -EFSCORRUPTED; // There's no logs. if (err) return err; // Will return error ext4_lock_group(ac->ac_sb, group); if (unlikely(EXT4_MB_GRP_BBITMAP_CORRUPT(e4b->bd_info))) // Unreachable goto out;

After commit 9008a58e5dce ("ext4: make the bitmap read routines return real error codes") merged, Commit 163a203ddb36 ("ext4: mark block group as corrupt on block bitmap error") is no real solution for allocating blocks from corrupted block groups. This is because if 'EXT4_MB_GRP_BBITMAP_CORRUPT(e4b->bd_info)' is true, then 'ext4_mb_load_buddy()' may return an error. This means that the block allocation will fail. Therefore, check block group if corrupted when ext4_mb_load_buddy() returns error.

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5(medium)
EG Risk
29(Track)
EG Risk 29/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity55% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
2%
KEV
Not listed

Published

May 5, 2026

Last Modified

May 20, 2026

References (8)

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-43068(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(1)

Vendor / EcosystemFixed in / PatchReleasedSource
linuxKernel @ 5.10.253—osv

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 6× in last 7d / 22× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-07-24 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-23 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-23 03:13 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-07-22 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-21 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-20 17:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-19 17:48 UTCOSV refresh
  8. 2026-07-19 14:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-18 10:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-16 17:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-13 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-09 19:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-08 15:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-07 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-06 02:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-04 06:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-01 15:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-06-30 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-06-29 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-06-28 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-06-28 04:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-06-27 03:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 62 more
  1. 2026-06-24 14:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-06-23 21:33 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-06-21 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-06-19 19:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-06-17 17:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-06-15 17:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-06-14 07:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-06-13 23:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-06-12 23:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-06-12 23:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-06-12 02:54 UTCGHSA enrichment
  18. 2026-06-11 14:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-06-11 02:06 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-06-10 22:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-06-09 23:10 UTCGHSA enrichment
  22. 2026-06-08 22:21 UTCGHSA enrichment
  23. 2026-06-08 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-06-08 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-06-07 15:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-06-07 15:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-06-07 14:50 UTCGHSA enrichment
  28. 2026-06-06 14:01 UTCGHSA enrichment
  29. 2026-06-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-06-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-06-05 22:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-06-05 13:13 UTCGHSA enrichment
  33. 2026-06-05 06:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-06-05 06:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-06-04 13:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-06-04 13:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-06-04 12:14 UTCGHSA enrichment
  38. 2026-06-03 11:25 UTCGHSA enrichment
  39. 2026-06-02 20:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-06-02 10:37 UTCGHSA enrichment
  41. 2026-06-01 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-06-01 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-06-01 09:49 UTCEG score recompute▲ 5.50
  44. 2026-06-01 09:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
  45. 2026-05-31 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-05-31 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-05-31 00:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-05-31 00:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-05-29 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-05-29 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-05-28 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-05-28 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-05-27 13:40 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-05-27 13:40 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-05-26 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-05-26 07:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-05-20 22:38 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-05-20 22:38 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-05-20 14:27 UTCEG score recompute
  60. 2026-05-20 14:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
  61. 2026-05-20 11:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-05-20 11:22 UTCEPSS rescore

Related CVEs(same product + same CWE)

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-43068?
CVE-2026-43068 is a medium vulnerability published on May 5, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ext4: avoid allocate block from corrupted group in ext4mbfindbygoal() There's issue as follows: ... EXT4-fs (mmcblk0p1): Delayed block allocation failed for inode 206 at logical offset 0 with max blocks 1 with error 117 EXT4-fs…
When was CVE-2026-43068 disclosed?
CVE-2026-43068 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on May 5, 2026, with the most recent update on May 20, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-43068 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-43068 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 98.1% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-43068?
CVE-2026-43068 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-43068?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-43068, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-43068

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-43068?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.

Start Free Scan →Browse All CVEs