CVE-2026-42769

MEDIUMPre-NVD 5.35.3
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 5.3 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2026-06-09. CISA-ADP (Vulnrichment) CVSS v3.1 baseline 5.3; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: cisa-adp, epss, ghsa
Trending — 3 sources updated this week
5.3
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS: 0%CVSS: 5.3Exploit: NoneExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

Issue Summary: An error in the callback used to verify the certificate provided in a Root CA key update Certificate Management Protocol (CMP) message response rendered the certificate validation ineffectual, which could lead to escalation of credentials from the Registration Authority (RA) level to the root Certification Authority (root CA) level.

Impact Summary: The Registration Autority could replace the root CA certificate for the CMP clients with an arbitrary root CA certificate.

One of the parts of the Certificate Management Protocol (CMP), specified in RFC 9810, is Root Certification Authority (root CA) key Rollover, which is sent by the server in a message with type 'id-it-rootCaKeyUpdate'. As part of these messages, 'newWithOld' certificate, the new root CA certificate signed with the old root CA key, is provided, and verifying its signature is crucial for transferring the trust from the old CA key to the new one.

The 'id-it-rootCaKeyUpdate' messages are expected to be processed with OSSL_CMP_get1_rootCaKeyUpdate(), that is expected to verify the 'newWithOld' certificate. A typo in the certificate chain building code led to adding an incorrect certificate ('newWithOld' instead of 'oldRoot') to the certificate chain, rendering the certificate verification process ineffectual (only the issuer name and the algorithm OIDs were verified by other parts of the verification code).

An attacker who already has credentials that satisfy the CMP message protection checks can generate a new key pair and use a crafted self-signed certificate in its 'id-it-rootCaKeyUpdate' CMP messages which affected CMP clients would accept as a new trust anchor.

Significant preconditions for the attack (having valid RA-level credentials) are the reason the issue was assigned Low severity.

The FIPS modules are not affected by this issue, as the affected code is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.

CVSS v3
5.3
EG Score
5.3(medium)
EG Risk
EPSS
17.8%
KEV
Not listed

Published

June 9, 2026

Last Modified

June 15, 2026

Advisory Details (5)

Auto-updated Jun 14, 2026
Upstream fix merged — awaiting tagged release. Sources: github_commit.
github_commit

commit d531f21c0fe9 (openssl/openssl)

Fix landed in openssl/openssl commit d531f21c0fe9 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/d531f21c0fe99067a66fc0ff1161ef127f9cd70b
github_commit

commit d35cd473a271 (openssl/openssl)

Fix landed in openssl/openssl commit d35cd473a271 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/d35cd473a271bf3ce7bf3d32af53217fb83ae92c
github_commit

commit 777b363b16fc (openssl/openssl)

Fix landed in openssl/openssl commit 777b363b16fc — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/777b363b16fcf2153bb3ded39dc3838713667c44
github_commit

commit 54d0989997e5 (openssl/openssl)

Fix landed in openssl/openssl commit 54d0989997e5 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/54d0989997e5fc26057009a9782c3441ce3842fb

Patch Availability(6)

Vendor / EcosystemFixed in / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntuopenssl (3.0.2-0ubuntu1.25) @ jammy2026-07-16ubuntu
redhatinsights-proxy/insights-proxy-container-rhel9:17828905032026-07-01redhat
redhatdiscovery/discovery-ui-rhel9:17821669522026-06-24redhat
redhatrhui5/rhua-rhel9:17815257392026-06-16redhat
redhatopenssl-1:3.5.5-4.el10_22026-06-11redhat
redhatopenssl-1:3.5.5-4.el9_82026-06-11redhat

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(1)

Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 8× in last 7d / 69× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 110 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-07-22 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-20 17:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-19 14:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-19 02:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-18 10:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-16 17:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-16 11:52 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-07-16 11:52 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-15 10:09 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-07-15 10:09 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-07-15 02:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-14 02:19 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-07-14 02:19 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-07-13 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-13 06:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-12 05:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-11 22:27 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-07-11 22:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-07-11 08:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-10 20:53 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-07-10 20:53 UTCGHSA enrichment
  23. 2026-07-09 19:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-09 03:30 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-07-09 03:30 UTCGHSA enrichment
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-07-08 15:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-08 01:30 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-07-08 01:30 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-07-07 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-06 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-06 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-06 02:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-06 02:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-05 15:47 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-07-05 15:47 UTCGHSA enrichment
  11. 2026-07-05 02:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-04 14:14 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-07-04 14:14 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-07-04 06:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-03 02:24 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-07-03 02:24 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-07-02 00:50 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-07-02 00:50 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-07-01 15:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-06-30 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-06-30 23:17 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-06-30 23:17 UTCGHSA enrichment
  23. 2026-06-29 21:45 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-06-29 21:45 UTCGHSA enrichment
  25. 2026-06-29 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-06-28 20:12 UTCVendor advisory
  27. 2026-06-28 20:12 UTCGHSA enrichment
  28. 2026-06-28 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-06-28 04:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-06-27 18:39 UTCVendor advisory
  31. 2026-06-27 18:39 UTCGHSA enrichment
  32. 2026-06-27 03:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-06-26 17:06 UTCVendor advisory
  34. 2026-06-26 17:06 UTCGHSA enrichment
  35. 2026-06-25 15:34 UTCVendor advisory
  36. 2026-06-25 15:33 UTCGHSA enrichment
  37. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-06-24 14:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-06-24 13:55 UTCVendor advisory
  41. 2026-06-24 13:55 UTCGHSA enrichment
  42. 2026-06-23 21:33 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-06-23 10:59 UTCVendor advisory
  44. 2026-06-23 10:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
  45. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-06-22 05:18 UTCVendor advisory
  48. 2026-06-22 05:18 UTCGHSA enrichment
  49. 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-06-21 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-06-21 01:48 UTCVendor advisory
  53. 2026-06-21 01:48 UTCGHSA enrichment
  54. 2026-06-19 23:17 UTCVendor advisory
  55. 2026-06-19 23:17 UTCGHSA enrichment
  56. 2026-06-19 19:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-06-18 21:42 UTCVendor advisory
  58. 2026-06-18 21:42 UTCGHSA enrichment
  59. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-06-17 20:09 UTCVendor advisory
  62. 2026-06-17 20:09 UTCGHSA enrichment
  63. 2026-06-17 17:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-06-16 18:37 UTCVendor advisory
  65. 2026-06-16 18:36 UTCGHSA enrichment
  66. 2026-06-16 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-06-15 17:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  68. 2026-06-15 17:01 UTCVendor advisory
  69. 2026-06-15 17:01 UTCGHSA enrichment
  70. 2026-06-14 15:27 UTCVendor advisory
  71. 2026-06-14 15:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
  72. 2026-06-13 23:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  73. 2026-06-13 13:55 UTCVendor advisory
  74. 2026-06-13 13:55 UTCGHSA enrichment
  75. 2026-06-12 23:12 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-42769?
CVE-2026-42769 is a medium vulnerability published on June 9, 2026. Issue Summary: An error in the callback used to verify the certificate provided in a Root CA key update Certificate Management Protocol (CMP) message response rendered the certificate validation ineffectual, which could lead to escalation of credentials from the Registration Authority (RA) level to…
When was CVE-2026-42769 disclosed?
CVE-2026-42769 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on June 9, 2026, with the most recent update on June 15, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-42769 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-42769 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 17.8% percentile likelihood of exploitation in the next 30 days — higher percentiles indicate greater predicted risk.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-42769?
CVE-2026-42769 has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 5.3 (CISA-ADP / Vulnrichment enrichment; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-42769?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-42769, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-42769

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-42769?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.