CVE-2026-42027

CRITICALPre-NVD 9.89.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 9.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2026-05-04. CISA-ADP (Vulnrichment) CVSS v3.1 baseline 9.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: CISA-ADP (Vulnrichment) CVSS v3.1, EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory
Trending — 4 sources updated this week

Also known asEUVD-2026-27005 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-cx4m-2p55-rw7j (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.7%CVSS: 9.8Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

Arbitrary Class Instantiation via Model Manifest in Apache OpenNLP ExtensionLoader

Versions Affected: before 1.9.5, before 2.5.9, before 3.0.0-M3

Description: 

The ExtensionLoader.instantiateExtension(Class, String) method loads a class by its fully-qualified name via Class.forName() and invokes its no-arg constructor, with the class name sourced from the manifest.properties entry of a model archive. The existing isAssignableFrom check correctly rejects classes that are not subtypes of the expected extension interface (BaseToolFactory for factory=, ArtifactSerializer for serializer-class-*), but the check runs after Class.forName() has already loaded and initialized the named class.

Class.forName() with default initialization semantics executes the target class's static initializer before returning, so an attacker who can supply a crafted model archive can cause the static initializer of any class on the classpath to run during model loading, regardless of whether that class passes the subsequent type check.

Exploitation requires a class with attacker-useful side effects in its static initializer (for example, JNDI lookup, outbound network I/O, or filesystem access) to be present on the classpath, so this is not a drop-in remote code execution; however, the attack surface grows as third-party model distribution becomes more common (community model repositories, Hugging Face-style sharing), where users routinely load model files from origins they do not control. A secondary, narrower vector affects deployments that ship legitimate BaseToolFactory or ArtifactSerializer subclasses with side-effecting no-arg constructors: a malicious manifest can name such a class and force its constructor to run during model load.

Mitigation: 

* 2.x users should upgrade to 2.5.9. * 3.x users should upgrade to 3.0.0-M3.

Note: The fix introduces a package-prefix allowlist that is consulted before Class.forName() is invoked, so the static initializer of a disallowed class is never executed. Classes under the opennlp. prefix remain permitted by default. Deployments that load models referencing factories or serializers outside opennlp.* must opt those packages in, either programmatically via ExtensionLoader.registerAllowedPackage(String) before the first model load, or by setting the OPENNLP_EXT_ALLOWED_PACKAGES system property to a comma-separated list of allowed package prefixes.

Users who cannot upgrade immediately should ensure that all model files are sourced from trusted origins and should audit their classpath for classes with side-effecting static initializers or constructors, particularly any that perform JNDI lookups, network requests, or filesystem operations during class initialization.

CVSS v3
9.8
EG Score
9.8CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
59
EG Risk 59/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity98% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.7% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
0.7%
EPSS %ILE
53rd
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
9.8 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.7% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-01). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

May 4, 2026

Last Modified

October 26, 2026

Advisory Details (6)

Auto-updated Oct 26, 2026
Patch available. Sources: redhat.
Red Hat

2466527 – (CVE-2026-42027) CVE-2026-42027 Apache OpenNLP: Apache OpenNLP: Arbitrary Class Loading via Model Manifest

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2466527
Red HatMentions a patch (unverified)

CVE-2026-42027 - Red Hat Customer Portal

Affected: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 or OpenShift Container Platform 4, is affected by this vulnerability and a fix may be released to a

https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-42027
Red HatMentions a patch (unverified)
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:65126
Web page

oss-security - CVE-2026-42027: Apache OpenNLP: Arbitrary Class Instantiation via Model Manifest in ExtensionLoader

http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/05/01/20

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-42027(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(4)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
redhatrhoai/odh-trustyai-service-rhel9:17881986812026-09-08redhat
mavenorg.apache.opennlp:opennlp-tools @ 3.0.0-M3 (fixes >= 3.0.0-M1, < 3.0.0-M3)—ghsa
mavenorg.apache.opennlp:opennlp-tools @ 2.5.9 (fixes >= 2.0.0, < 2.5.9)—ghsa
mavenorg.apache.opennlp:opennlp-tools @ 1.9.5 (fixes < 1.9.5)—ghsa

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(5 across 5 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
apache-opennlp1.9.3-1 ... 2.5.9-1 (18 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
apache-opennlp2.1.0-1 ... 2.5.9-1 (15 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
apache-opennlp2.5.12-1, 2.5.3-1, 2.5.9-1
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
apache-opennlp2.5.3-1
  • every version up to 2.5.9-1: fixed in 2.5.9-1
—
Maven(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
org.apache.opennlp:opennlp-tools1.5.1-incubating ... 1.9.4 (17 versions)
  • 2.0.0 up to 2.5.9: fixed in 2.5.9
  • 3.0.0-M1 up to 3.0.0-M3: fixed in 3.0.0-M3
  • every version up to 1.9.5: fixed in 1.9.5
—

Weakness Classification(2)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 24× in last 7d / 80× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 243 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 143 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-01 21:33 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-11-01 21:33 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-11-01 21:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cx4m-2p55-rw7j · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  4. 2026-11-01 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  5. 2026-11-01 07:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cx4m-2p55-rw7j · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  6. 2026-11-01 07:51 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-31 21:12 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-31 21:12 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-10-31 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  10. 2026-10-30 20:50 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-30 20:50 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-10-30 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  13. 2026-10-29 20:29 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-29 20:29 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-10-29 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  16. 2026-10-28 20:08 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-10-28 20:08 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-10-28 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  19. 2026-10-27 19:47 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-10-27 19:47 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  22. 2026-10-26 19:26 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-10-26 19:26 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-10-26 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  25. 2026-10-25 23:46 UTCEG score recompute
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-25 23:46 UTCVendor advisory
  2. 2026-10-25 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  3. 2026-10-25 14:29 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-24 23:14 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-24 23:14 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.3% · 69th percentile
  7. 2026-10-23 22:53 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-23 22:53 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-10-23 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.3% · 69th percentile
  10. 2026-10-22 22:13 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-22 22:13 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-10-22 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.3% · 69th percentile
  13. 2026-10-21 21:50 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-21 21:50 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.3% · 69th percentile
  16. 2026-10-20 21:23 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-10-20 21:23 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.3% · 69th percentile
  19. 2026-10-19 21:00 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-10-19 21:00 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-10-19 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.3% · 69th percentile
  22. 2026-10-18 19:35 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-10-18 19:35 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.3% · 69th percentile
  25. 2026-10-18 03:41 UTCEG score recompute
  26. 2026-10-17 19:13 UTCEG score recompute
  27. 2026-10-17 19:13 UTCVendor advisory
  28. 2026-10-17 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.3% · 69th percentile
  29. 2026-10-16 18:52 UTCEG score recompute
  30. 2026-10-16 18:52 UTCVendor advisory
  31. 2026-10-16 16:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.3% · 69th percentile
  32. 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.3% · 69th percentile
  33. 2026-10-15 15:53 UTCEG score recompute
  34. 2026-10-15 15:53 UTCVendor advisory
  35. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.3% · 69th percentile
  36. 2026-10-14 10:07 UTCEG score recompute
  37. 2026-10-14 10:07 UTCVendor advisory
  38. 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.3% · 69th percentile
  39. 2026-10-13 08:23 UTCEG score recompute
  40. 2026-10-13 08:23 UTCVendor advisory
  41. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.3% · 69th percentile
  42. 2026-10-12 16:07 UTCEG score recompute
  43. 2026-10-12 08:00 UTCVendor advisory
  44. 2026-10-11 19:49 UTCEG score recompute
  45. 2026-10-11 17:03 UTCEG score recompute
  46. 2026-10-11 14:29 UTCEG score recompute
  47. 2026-10-11 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.3% · 69th percentile
  48. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.3% · 69th percentile
  49. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.3% · 68th percentile
  50. 2026-10-08 17:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.3% · 68th percentile
  51. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.3% · 68th percentile
  52. 2026-10-06 15:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.3% · 68th percentile
  53. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.3% · 68th percentile
  54. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.3% · 68th percentile
  55. 2026-10-03 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.3% · 68th percentile
  56. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.3% · 68th percentile
  57. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.3% · 68th percentile
  58. 2026-09-29 07:15 UTCOSV refresh
  59. 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.3% · 68th percentile
  60. 2026-09-26 15:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.3% · 68th percentile
  61. 2026-09-23 17:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  62. 2026-09-20 20:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  63. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  64. 2026-09-17 19:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  65. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  66. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  67. 2026-09-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  68. 2026-09-12 15:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  69. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  70. 2026-09-11 09:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  71. 2026-09-10 09:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
  72. 2026-09-09 13:41 UTCVendor advisory
  73. 2026-09-09 12:39 UTCEG score recompute
  74. 2026-09-09 12:39 UTCVendor advisory
  75. 2026-09-08 22:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-42027?
CVE-2026-42027 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on May 4, 2026. Arbitrary Class Instantiation via Model Manifest in Apache OpenNLP ExtensionLoader Versions Affected: before 1.9.5, before 2.5.9, before 3.0.0-M3 Description: The ExtensionLoader.instantiateExtension(Class, String) method loads a class by its fully-qualified name via Class.forName() and invokes its…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-42027 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-42027 was published on May 4, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 26, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-42027 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-42027 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.7% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (53rd percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-42027?
CVE-2026-42027 has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 9.8 (CISA-ADP / Vulnrichment enrichment; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-42027?
A fix for CVE-2026-42027 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-42027 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-42027

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-42027?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.