CVE-2026-42009

HIGHPre-NVD 7.57.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 7.5 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-05-18. A secondary CVSS source baseline 7.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, a secondary CVSS source
Trending — 4 sources updated this week

Also known asEUVD-2026-30769 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-9gx7-g5hv-xjjj (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

7.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 1.3%CVSS: 7.5Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

A flaw was found in gnutls. A remote attacker could exploit an issue in the Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS) packet reordering logic. The comparator function, responsible for ordering DTLS packets by sequence numbers, did not correctly handle packets with duplicate sequence numbers. This could lead to unstable packet ordering or undefined behavior, resulting in a denial of service.

CVSS v3
7.5
EG Score
7.5HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
49
EG Risk 49/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity75% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 7.5 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation1.3% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
1.3%
EPSS %ILE
71st
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (7.5): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 7.5 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
7.5 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
1.3% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-30). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

May 18, 2026

Last Modified

October 30, 2026

Advisory Details (2)

Auto-updated May 18, 2026
Patch available. Sources: redhat.
Red Hat

2467279 – (CVE-2026-42009) CVE-2026-42009 gnutls: gnutls: Denial of Service via DTLS packet reordering vulnerability

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2467279
Red HatMentions a patch (unverified)

cve-details

https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-42009

Patch Availability(30)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
redhatcert-manager/cert-manager-operator-bundle:17919704842026-10-14redhat
redhatcert-manager/cert-manager-operator-bundle:17919662592026-10-14redhat
redhatcert-manager/cert-manager-operator-rhel9:17917882872026-10-13redhat
redhatcert-manager/cert-manager-istio-csr-rhel9:17914597592026-10-13redhat
redhatcert-manager/jetstack-cert-manager-rhel9:17913710692026-10-13redhat
redhatcert-manager/jetstack-cert-manager-rhel9:17914597112026-10-13redhat
redhatcert-manager/cert-manager-operator-rhel9:17890290762026-10-13redhat
redhatrhai/base-image-neuron-rhel9:17907035422026-10-01redhat
redhatcert-manager/cert-manager-trust-manager-rhel9:17905985932026-09-28redhat
redhatopenshift/ose-rhel-coreos-9:413.92.202609080414-02026-09-17redhat
redhatopenshift/ose-rhel-coreos-8:412.86.202608241157-02026-09-03redhat
redhatopenshift/ose-rhel-coreos-9:417.94.202608250221-02026-09-03redhat
redhatopenshift/ose-rhel-coreos-9:416.94.202608150307-02026-08-31redhat
redhatopenshift/ose-rhel-coreos-9:414.92.202608172040-02026-08-31redhat
redhatopenshift/ose-rhel-coreos-9:415.92.202608180329-02026-08-31redhat
redhatopenshift/ose-rhel-coreos-9:418.94.202608142238-02026-08-26redhat
redhatrhui5/rhua-tp-rhel9:17872412602026-08-24redhat
redhatopenshift/ose-rhel-coreos-9:4.19.9.6.202607151909-02026-07-22redhat
redhatgnutls-0:3.7.6-21.el9_2.72026-07-20redhat
redhatopenshift/ose-rhel-coreos-9:4.20.9.6.202607010620-02026-07-07redhat
redhatopenshift/ose-rhel-coreos-9:4.21.9.6.202607011303-02026-07-07redhat
redhatrhaiis/model-opt-cuda-rhel9:17829510512026-07-06redhat
redhatrhaiis/vllm-cuda-rhel9:17829510122026-07-06redhat
redhatrhaiis/vllm-rocm-rhel9:17829512442026-07-06redhat
redhatgnutls-0:3.3.29-9.el7_9.12026-07-01redhat
redhatopenshift/ose-rhel-coreos-9:4.22.9.8.202606230855-02026-06-30redhat
redhatlibtasn1-0:4.13-3.el8_4.12026-06-29redhat
redhatlibtasn1-0:4.13-4.el8_8.12026-06-29redhat
redhatgnutls-0:3.8.3-4.el9_4.62026-06-29redhat
redhatlibtasn1-0:4.13-3.el8_6.22026-06-29redhat

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(9 across 9 ecosystems)
Alpine:v3.20(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
gnutls—
  • every version up to 3.8.13-r0: fixed in 3.8.13-r0
—
Alpine:v3.21(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
gnutls—
  • every version up to 3.8.13-r0: fixed in 3.8.13-r0
—
Alpine:v3.22(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
gnutls—
  • every version up to 3.8.13-r0: fixed in 3.8.13-r0
—
Alpine:v3.23(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
gnutls—
  • every version up to 3.8.13-r0: fixed in 3.8.13-r0
—
Alpine:v3.24(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
gnutls—
  • every version up to 3.8.13-r0: fixed in 3.8.13-r0
—
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
gnutls283.7.1-5 ... 3.7.1-5+deb11u9 (10 versions)
  • every version up to 3.7.1-5+deb11u10: fixed in 3.7.1-5+deb11u10
—
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
gnutls283.7.9-2 ... 3.7.9-2+deb12u6 (7 versions)
  • every version up to 3.7.9-2+deb12u7: fixed in 3.7.9-2+deb12u7
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
gnutls283.8.9-3, 3.8.9-3+deb13u1, 3.8.9-3+deb13u2, 3.8.9-3+deb13u3
  • every version up to 3.8.9-3+deb13u4: fixed in 3.8.9-3+deb13u4
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
gnutls283.8.10-1 ... 3.8.9-3 (11 versions)
  • every version up to 3.8.13-1: fixed in 3.8.13-1
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(19)

Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 22× in last 7d / 75× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 506 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 406 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-01 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.3% · 71st percentile
  2. 2026-10-31 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.3% · 71st percentile
  3. 2026-10-30 17:26 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-30 17:26 UTCVendor advisory
  5. 2026-10-30 17:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-9gx7-g5hv-xjjj · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  6. 2026-10-30 17:15 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-30 17:15 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-10-30 17:15 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-9gx7-g5hv-xjjj · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  9. 2026-10-30 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.3% · 71st percentile
  10. 2026-10-29 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.3% · 71st percentile
  11. 2026-10-28 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.3% · 71st percentile
  12. 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.3% · 71st percentile
  13. 2026-10-26 18:40 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-26 18:40 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-10-26 18:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-9gx7-g5hv-xjjj · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  16. 2026-10-26 17:23 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-10-26 17:23 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-10-26 17:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-9gx7-g5hv-xjjj · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  19. 2026-10-26 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.3% · 70th percentile
  20. 2026-10-26 13:28 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-10-26 13:28 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-10-26 13:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-9gx7-g5hv-xjjj · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  23. 2026-10-25 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.3% · 70th percentile
  24. 2026-10-25 14:29 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 66th percentile
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-23 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 66th percentile
  2. 2026-10-22 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 66th percentile
  3. 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 66th percentile
  4. 2026-10-21 06:21 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-21 06:21 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-10-21 06:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-9gx7-g5hv-xjjj · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  7. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 65th percentile
  8. 2026-10-19 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 65th percentile
  9. 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 65th percentile
  10. 2026-10-18 03:41 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-17 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 65th percentile
  12. 2026-10-16 16:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 65th percentile
  13. 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 65th percentile
  14. 2026-10-14 20:32 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-10-14 20:32 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-10-14 20:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-9gx7-g5hv-xjjj · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  17. 2026-10-14 19:31 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-10-14 19:31 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-10-14 19:31 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-9gx7-g5hv-xjjj · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  20. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 65th percentile
  21. 2026-10-14 03:29 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-10-14 03:29 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-10-14 03:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-9gx7-g5hv-xjjj · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  24. 2026-10-14 03:02 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-10-14 03:02 UTCVendor advisory
  26. 2026-10-14 03:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-9gx7-g5hv-xjjj · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  27. 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 65th percentile
  28. 2026-10-13 01:27 UTCEG score recompute
  29. 2026-10-13 01:27 UTCVendor advisory
  30. 2026-10-13 01:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-9gx7-g5hv-xjjj · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  31. 2026-10-13 00:55 UTCEG score recompute
  32. 2026-10-13 00:55 UTCVendor advisory
  33. 2026-10-13 00:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-9gx7-g5hv-xjjj · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  34. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 65th percentile
  35. 2026-10-12 16:07 UTCEG score recompute
  36. 2026-10-11 19:49 UTCEG score recompute
  37. 2026-10-11 17:03 UTCEG score recompute
  38. 2026-10-11 14:29 UTCEG score recompute
  39. 2026-10-11 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 65th percentile
  40. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 65th percentile
  41. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 65th percentile
  42. 2026-10-08 21:21 UTCEG score recompute
  43. 2026-10-08 21:21 UTCVendor advisory
  44. 2026-10-08 21:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-9gx7-g5hv-xjjj · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  45. 2026-10-08 17:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 65th percentile
  46. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 65th percentile
  47. 2026-10-06 15:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 65th percentile
  48. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 65th percentile
  49. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 65th percentile
  50. 2026-10-03 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 65th percentile
  51. 2026-10-02 03:30 UTCEG score recompute
  52. 2026-10-02 03:30 UTCVendor advisory
  53. 2026-10-02 03:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-9gx7-g5hv-xjjj · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  54. 2026-10-02 02:40 UTCEG score recompute
  55. 2026-10-02 02:40 UTCVendor advisory
  56. 2026-10-02 02:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-9gx7-g5hv-xjjj · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  57. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 65th percentile
  58. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 65th percentile
  59. 2026-09-29 01:20 UTCEG score recompute
  60. 2026-09-29 01:20 UTCVendor advisory
  61. 2026-09-29 01:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-9gx7-g5hv-xjjj · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  62. 2026-09-29 00:56 UTCEG score recompute
  63. 2026-09-29 00:56 UTCVendor advisory
  64. 2026-09-29 00:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-9gx7-g5hv-xjjj · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  65. 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 65th percentile
  66. 2026-09-26 15:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 65th percentile
  67. 2026-09-23 17:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.3% · 69th percentile
  68. 2026-09-20 20:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.3% · 69th percentile
  69. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.3% · 69th percentile
  70. 2026-09-18 13:23 UTCEG score recompute
  71. 2026-09-18 13:23 UTCVendor advisory
  72. 2026-09-18 13:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-9gx7-g5hv-xjjj · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  73. 2026-09-18 12:20 UTCEG score recompute
  74. 2026-09-18 12:20 UTCVendor advisory
  75. 2026-09-18 12:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-9gx7-g5hv-xjjj · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-42009?
CVE-2026-42009 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on May 18, 2026. A flaw was found in gnutls. A remote attacker could exploit an issue in the Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS) packet reordering logic. The comparator function, responsible for ordering DTLS packets by sequence numbers, did not correctly handle packets with duplicate sequence numbers. This…
When was CVE-2026-42009 made public?
CVE-2026-42009 was made public on April 29, 2026: that is the date its CVE record's CNA, Red Hat, Inc., gives for when the vulnerability was made public. The CVE record itself was published on May 18, 2026. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 30, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-42009 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-42009 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 1.3% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (71st percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-42009?
CVE-2026-42009 has a CVSS base score of 7.5 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-42009?
A fix for CVE-2026-42009 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-42009 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-42009

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-42009?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.