CVE-2026-37237

HIGHPre-NVD 7.57.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 7.5 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-08-28. CISA-ADP (Vulnrichment) CVSS v3.1 baseline 7.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: CISA-ADP (Vulnrichment) CVSS v3.1, EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory
Trending — 4 sources updated this week

Also known asEUVD-2026-67775 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-63mw-rppr-f2pf (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

7.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.7%CVSS: 7.5Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

vLLM up to and including 0.17.0 allows remote attackers to cause a Denial of Service via memory exhaustion. The AsyncMediaIO.fetch_audio and AsyncMediaIO.fetch_image functions in multimodal/inputs.py fetch user-supplied media URLs using aiohttp and call r.read() without enforcing a maximum response size, allowing an attacker to exhaust server memory by providing a URL to an arbitrarily large file.

CVSS v3
7.5
EG Score
7.5HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
49
EG Risk 49/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity75% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 7.5 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.7% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
0.7%
EPSS %ILE
54th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (7.5): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 7.5 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
7.5 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.7% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-31). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

August 28, 2026

Last Modified

September 29, 2026

Advisory Details (3)

Auto-updated Aug 28, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github_pr.
Web page

CVE-2026-37237 · s00me00ne

https://s00me00ne.com/cve/cve-2026-37237/
GitHub pull request

[Docs] Expand --allowed-media-domains security guidance with threat details

Fix merged in vllm-project/vllm PR #36506 on 2026-03-09 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/36506
Web page

vllm/vllm/multimodal/inputs.py at main · vllm-project/vllm · GitHub

https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/blob/main/vllm/multimodal/inputs.py

Patch Availability(10)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
redhatrhelai3/disk-image-cuda-rhel9:17927017962026-10-26redhat
redhatrhelai3/bootc-rocm-rhel9:17926129212026-10-26redhat
redhatrhoai/odh-th-torch-cuda-py312-rhel9:17919276422026-10-21redhat
redhatrhoai/odh-kserve-storage-initializer-rhel9:17909585492026-10-19redhat
redhatrhaii/vllm-cuda-rhel9:17918571832026-10-14redhat
redhatrhaii/vllm-spyre-rhel9:17918585922026-10-14redhat
redhatrhaii/vllm-rocm-rhel9:17918567252026-10-14redhat
redhatrhaii/vllm-cpu-rhel9:17918573012026-10-14redhat
redhatrhaiis/vllm-rocm-rhel9:17906217132026-09-30redhat
redhatrhaiis/vllm-cuda-rhel9:17906217182026-09-30redhat

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 10× in last 7d / 75× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 215 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 115 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-01 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 54th percentile
  2. 2026-11-01 01:47 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-11-01 01:47 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-11-01 01:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-63mw-rppr-f2pf · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  5. 2026-10-31 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 54th percentile
  6. 2026-10-30 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 54th percentile
  7. 2026-10-29 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 54th percentile
  8. 2026-10-28 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  9. 2026-10-27 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  10. 2026-10-26 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  11. 2026-10-25 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  12. 2026-10-25 14:32 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-24 20:31 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-24 20:31 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-10-24 20:31 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-63mw-rppr-f2pf · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  16. 2026-10-24 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  17. 2026-10-23 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  18. 2026-10-22 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  19. 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  20. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  21. 2026-10-19 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  22. 2026-10-18 03:44 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-10-17 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  24. 2026-10-17 15:13 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-10-17 15:13 UTCVendor advisory
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-17 15:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-63mw-rppr-f2pf · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  2. 2026-10-16 16:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  3. 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  4. 2026-10-14 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  5. 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  6. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  7. 2026-10-12 16:11 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-11 19:53 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-10-11 17:06 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-11 14:33 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-11 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  12. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  13. 2026-10-10 14:21 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-10-10 14:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-63mw-rppr-f2pf · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  15. 2026-10-10 01:41 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-10-10 01:41 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-10-10 01:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-63mw-rppr-f2pf · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  18. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  19. 2026-10-09 02:49 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-10-09 02:49 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-10-09 02:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-63mw-rppr-f2pf · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  22. 2026-10-08 17:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  23. 2026-10-08 01:06 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-10-08 01:06 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-10-08 01:06 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-63mw-rppr-f2pf · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  26. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  27. 2026-10-07 09:06 UTCVendor advisory
  28. 2026-10-07 09:06 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-63mw-rppr-f2pf · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  29. 2026-10-06 20:31 UTCEG score recompute
  30. 2026-10-06 20:31 UTCVendor advisory
  31. 2026-10-06 20:31 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-63mw-rppr-f2pf · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  32. 2026-10-06 15:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  33. 2026-10-06 07:29 UTCEG score recompute
  34. 2026-10-06 07:29 UTCVendor advisory
  35. 2026-10-06 07:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-63mw-rppr-f2pf · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  36. 2026-10-05 17:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  37. 2026-10-05 17:16 UTCVendor advisory
  38. 2026-10-05 17:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-63mw-rppr-f2pf · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  39. 2026-10-05 04:41 UTCEG score recompute
  40. 2026-10-05 04:41 UTCVendor advisory
  41. 2026-10-05 04:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-63mw-rppr-f2pf · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  42. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  43. 2026-10-04 16:05 UTCVendor advisory
  44. 2026-10-04 16:05 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-63mw-rppr-f2pf · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  45. 2026-10-04 03:30 UTCVendor advisory
  46. 2026-10-04 03:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-63mw-rppr-f2pf · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  47. 2026-10-03 14:55 UTCEG score recompute
  48. 2026-10-03 14:55 UTCVendor advisory
  49. 2026-10-03 14:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-63mw-rppr-f2pf · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  50. 2026-10-03 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  51. 2026-10-02 22:11 UTCEG score recompute
  52. 2026-10-02 22:11 UTCVendor advisory
  53. 2026-10-02 22:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-63mw-rppr-f2pf · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  54. 2026-10-02 09:36 UTCVendor advisory
  55. 2026-10-02 09:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-63mw-rppr-f2pf · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  56. 2026-10-01 21:02 UTCEG score recompute
  57. 2026-10-01 21:02 UTCVendor advisory
  58. 2026-10-01 21:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-63mw-rppr-f2pf · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  59. 2026-10-01 19:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  60. 2026-10-01 08:26 UTCVendor advisory
  61. 2026-10-01 08:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-63mw-rppr-f2pf · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  62. 2026-09-30 19:52 UTCEG score recompute
  63. 2026-09-30 19:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-63mw-rppr-f2pf · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  64. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  65. 2026-09-30 04:17 UTCEG score recompute
  66. 2026-09-30 04:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-63mw-rppr-f2pf · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  67. 2026-09-29 12:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-63mw-rppr-f2pf · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  68. 2026-09-29 09:57 UTCEG score recompute
  69. 2026-09-29 09:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-63mw-rppr-f2pf · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  70. 2026-09-28 21:11 UTCEG score recompute
  71. 2026-09-28 21:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-63mw-rppr-f2pf · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  72. 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 53rd percentile
  73. 2026-09-28 05:27 UTCEG score recompute
  74. 2026-09-28 05:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-63mw-rppr-f2pf · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  75. 2026-09-27 16:53 UTCEG score recompute

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-37237?
CVE-2026-37237 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on August 28, 2026. vLLM up to and including 0.17.0 allows remote attackers to cause a Denial of Service via memory exhaustion. The AsyncMediaIO.fetch_audio and AsyncMediaIO.fetch_image functions in multimodal/inputs.py fetch user-supplied media URLs using aiohttp and call r.read() without enforcing a maximum response…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-37237 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-37237 was published on August 28, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of September 29, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-37237 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-37237 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.7% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (54th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-37237?
CVE-2026-37237 has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 7.5 (CISA-ADP / Vulnrichment enrichment; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-37237?
A fix for CVE-2026-37237 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-37237 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-37237

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-37237?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.