Trivy is a security scanner. On March 19, 2026, a threat actor used compromised credentials to publish a malicious Trivy v0.69.4 release, force-push 76 of 77 version tags in aquasecurity/trivy-action to credential-stealing malware, and replace all 7 tags in aquasecurity/setup-trivy with malicious commits. This incident is a continuation of the supply chain attack that began in late February 2026. Following the initial disclosure on March 1, credential rotation was performed but was not atomic (not all credentials were revoked simultaneously). The attacker could have use a valid token to exfiltrate newly rotated secrets during the rotation window (which lasted a few days). This could have allowed the attacker to retain access and execute the March 19 attack. Affected components include the aquasecurity/trivy Go / Container image version 0.69.4, the aquasecurity/trivy-action GitHub Action versions 0.0.1 – 0.34.2 (76/77), and theaquasecurity/setup-trivy GitHub Action versions 0.2.0 – 0.2.6, prior to the recreation of 0.2.6 with a safe commit. Known safe versions include versions 0.69.2 and 0.69.3 of the Trivy binary, version 0.35.0 of trivy-action, and version 0.2.6 of setup-trivy. Additionally, take other mitigations to ensure the safety of secrets. If there is any possibility that a compromised version ran in one's environment, all secrets accessible to affected pipelines must be treated as exposed and rotated immediately. Check whether one's organization pulled or executed Trivy v0.69.4 from any source. Remove any affected artifacts immediately. Review all workflows using aquasecurity/trivy-action or aquasecurity/setup-trivy. Those who referenced a version tag rather than a full commit SHA should check workflow run logs from March 19–20, 2026 for signs of compromise. Look for repositories named tpcp-docs in one's GitHub organization. The presence of such a repository may indicate that the fallback exfiltration mechanism was triggered and secrets were successfully stolen. Pin GitHub Actions to full, immutable commit SHA hashes, don't use mutable version tags.
CVE-2026-33634
“▲” beside the score: it is higher than NVD's CVSS score.
Score elevated to 9.0 because this CVE is listed on the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog (added 2026-03-26), indicating real-world exploitation has been confirmed by US federal agencies. NVD baseline CVSS 8.8 retained for reference. The 9.0 is the floor for confirmed exploitation, not an impact rating: this CVE's impact severity (EG Severity) is CVSS 8.8 HIGH under NVD CVSS v3. Confidence: HIGH.
Also known asEUVD-2026-14601 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-69fq-xp46-6x23 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD
- Actively exploited in the wild (CISA-KEV) — the reason this is sooner than the SSVC decision on this page at low or medium mission impact
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 8.8
- EG Score
- 9.0CRITICALhigh confidence
- EG Risk
- 80EG Risk 80/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity88% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 8.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation100% × 40%Fixed at 100% for a CISA KEV listing: EchelonGraph's rule.Automatability0% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low, Attend at medium and Act at high mission impact.Exploitation active (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low, sooner than that at medium and as soon as possible at high mission impact. - EPSS PROB
- 60%
- EPSS %ILE
- 99th
- KEV
- ⚠ Exploited
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (9.0): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.0 is the CISA KEV floor for confirmed exploitation, not an impact rating: its impact severity (EG Severity) is CVSS 8.8 HIGH.
- EG Severity
- 8.8 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.NVD CVSS v3 · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
- EG Likelihood
- 60% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-01). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- CISA KEV and EG-KEV Tier 1 (exploited in the wild)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Attend at medium mission impactTrack at low, Attend at medium and Act at high mission impact.CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days & forensic triage if the affected system is publicly exposed; 14 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low, Attend at medium and Act at high mission impact.
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low, sooner than that at medium and as soon as possible at high mission impact.
Exploitation active (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days & forensic triage if the affected system is publicly exposed; 14 days if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV yes (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
CISA required action“Apply mitigations per vendor instructions, follow applicable BOD 22-01 guidance for cloud services, or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable.”
Quoted verbatim from CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. CISA directs it at US federal civilian executive branch agencies under Binding Operational Directive (BOD) 26-04, which replaced BOD 22-01 on 10 June 2026; it is not EchelonGraph's advice. CISA's notes: https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-69fq-xp46-6x23 · https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-33634
Published
March 23, 2026
Last Modified
June 17, 2026
Advisory Details (10)
Auto-updated Oct 26, 2026KICS GitHub Action Compromised: TeamPCP Supply Chain Attack | Wiz Blog
https://www.wiz.io/blog/teampcp-attack-kics-github-actionClient Challenge
https://inspector.pypi.io/project/litellm/1.82.8/packages/f6/2c/731b614e6cee0bca1e010a36fd381fba69ee836fe3cb6753ba23ef2b9601/litellm-1.82.8.tar.gz/litellm-1.82.8/litellm_init.pth#line.1Client Challenge
https://inspector.pypi.io/project/litellm/1.82.7/packages/79/5f/b6998d42c6ccd32d36e12661f2734602e72a576d52a51f4245aef0b20b4d/litellm-1.82.7-py3-none-any.whl/litellm/proxy/proxy_server.py#line.130Malicious code in PyPI versions 4.87.1 and 4.87.2 · Advisory · team-telnyx/telnyx-python · GitHub
https://github.com/team-telnyx/telnyx-python/security/advisories/GHSA-955r-262c-33jcadvisory-database/vulns/litellm/PYSEC-2026-2.yaml at main · pypa/advisory-database · GitHub
https://github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/litellm/PYSEC-2026-2.yamlTrivy ecosystem supply chain temporarily compromised · Advisory · aquasecurity/trivy · GitHub
https://github.com/aquasecurity/trivy/security/advisories/GHSA-69fq-xp46-6x23Trivy Security incident 2026-03-19 · aquasecurity trivy · Discussion #10425 · GitHub
https://github.com/aquasecurity/trivy/discussions/10425[Security]: litellm PyPI package (v1.82.7 + v1.82.8) compromised — full timeline and status · Issue #24518 · BerriAI/litellm · GitHub
https://github.com/BerriAI/litellm/issues/24518litellm 1.82.8 Supply Chain Attack on PyPI (March 2026)
https://futuresearch.ai/blog/litellm-pypi-supply-chain-attackSecurity Update: Suspected Supply Chain Incident | liteLLM
https://docs.litellm.ai/blog/security-update-march-2026Patch Availability(3)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fix (by version range) / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| actions | aquasecurity/setup-trivy @ 0.2.6 (fixes < 0.2.6) | — | ghsa |
| actions | aquasecurity/trivy-action @ 0.35.0 (fixes < 0.35.0) | — | ghsa |
| go | github.com/aquasecurity/trivy | — | ghsa |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(3 across 2 ecosystems)
GitHub Actions(2)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| aquasecurity/setup-trivy | — | 0.2.6 (one range) | — |
| aquasecurity/trivy-action | — | 0.35.0 (one range) | — |
Go(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| github.com/aquasecurity/trivy | 0.69.4 |
| — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 15× in last 7d / 66× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 99 of 204 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 1 repeat row among the latest 100 is merged into the row it repeats. The 105 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-11-02 05:29 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-11-02 05:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-69fq-xp46-6x23 · GitHub severity CRITICAL
- 2026-11-01 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 60% · 99th percentile
- 2026-11-01 07:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-69fq-xp46-6x23 · GitHub severity CRITICAL
- 2026-11-01 07:00 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-31 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 60% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-31 08:32 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-30 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 60% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-30 10:04 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-29 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 60% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-29 11:35 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-28 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 60% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-28 13:08 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-27 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 60% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-27 14:37 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-25 17:36 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-25 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 60% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-25 14:34 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-24 19:08 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-24 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.7% · 77th percentile
- 2026-10-23 20:38 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-23 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.7% · 77th percentile
- 2026-10-22 22:08 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-22 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.7% · 77th percentile
- 2026-10-21 23:37 UTCEG score recompute
Show 74 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-21 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.7% · 77th percentile
- 2026-10-21 01:09 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.7% · 77th percentile
- 2026-10-20 02:40 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-19 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.7% · 76th percentile
- 2026-10-19 04:11 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-18 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.7% · 76th percentile
- 2026-10-18 03:46 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.7% · 76th percentile
- 2026-10-17 07:11 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-16 16:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.7% · 76th percentile
- 2026-10-16 08:43 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.7% · 76th percentile
- 2026-10-15 10:15 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-14 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.7% · 76th percentile
- 2026-10-14 11:47 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.7% · 76th percentile
- 2026-10-13 13:19 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.7% · 76th percentile
- 2026-10-12 14:49 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 19:55 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 17:08 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 14:35 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.7% · 76th percentile
- 2026-10-11 13:20 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-10 20:38 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.7% · 76th percentile
- 2026-10-09 23:50 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.7% · 76th percentile
- 2026-10-08 18:45 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-08 17:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.7% · 76th percentile
- 2026-10-08 02:07 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-07 23:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.7% · 76th percentile
- 2026-10-06 16:54 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-06 15:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.7% · 76th percentile
- 2026-10-05 20:08 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-05 17:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.7% · 76th percentile
- 2026-10-05 03:31 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.7% · 76th percentile
- 2026-10-03 18:18 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-03 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.7% · 76th percentile
- 2026-10-02 17:19 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-01 20:29 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-01 19:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.7% · 76th percentile
- 2026-09-30 15:26 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.7% · 76th percentile
- 2026-09-29 18:40 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-28 21:53 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-28 17:44 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.7% · 76th percentile
- 2026-09-27 21:51 UTCCISA KEV update
- 2026-09-27 16:50 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.7% · 76th percentile
- 2026-09-26 20:01 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-26 15:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.7% · 76th percentile
- 2026-09-26 03:21 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-26 00:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.7% · 75th percentile
- 2026-09-25 19:35 UTCCISA KEV update
- 2026-09-25 14:55 UTCCISA KEV update
- 2026-09-24 19:31 UTCCISA KEV update
- 2026-09-24 18:06 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-23 21:21 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-22 19:36 UTCCISA KEV update
- 2026-09-22 16:18 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-21 23:41 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-21 19:09 UTCCISA KEV update
- 2026-09-19 17:42 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-18 20:54 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 59% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-18 19:20 UTCCISA KEV update
- 2026-09-18 14:15 UTCCISA KEV update
- 2026-09-17 20:01 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-17 19:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 59% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-16 14:58 UTCEG score recompute
Publicly available exploits
(1 reference)Public exploit code is referenced for this CVE (1 GitHub PoC). Defenders should treat patch urgency accordingly.
- GitHub PoCugurrates/teampcp-supply-chain-attackPublished Mar 25, 2026
CVE-2026-33634 (CVSS 9.4) — The most impactful CI/CD supply chain attack of 2026 so far.
Open source ↗
Related CVEs(same product + same CWE)
Same product
4 shownGo:github.com/aquasecurity/trivy
Same CWE
10 shownCWE-506
Frequently asked(6)
What is CVE-2026-33634?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-33634 published?
Is CVE-2026-33634 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-33634?
Which products are affected by CVE-2026-33634?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-33634?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-33634
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-33634?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.