CVE-2026-31448

CRITICALPre-NVD 9.49.4
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 9.4 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2026-04-22. a secondary CVSS source baseline 9.4; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, secondary
Trending — 3 sources updated this week
9.4
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS: 0%CVSS: 9.4Exploit: NoneExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

ext4: avoid infinite loops caused by residual data

On the mkdir/mknod path, when mapping logical blocks to physical blocks, if inserting a new extent into the extent tree fails (in this example, because the file system disabled the huge file feature when marking the inode as dirty), ext4_ext_map_blocks() only calls ext4_free_blocks() to reclaim the physical block without deleting the corresponding data in the extent tree. This causes subsequent mkdir operations to reference the previously reclaimed physical block number again, even though this physical block is already being used by the xattr block. Therefore, a situation arises where both the directory and xattr are using the same buffer head block in memory simultaneously.

The above causes ext4_xattr_block_set() to enter an infinite loop about "inserted" and cannot release the inode lock, ultimately leading to the 143s blocking problem mentioned in [1].

If the metadata is corrupted, then trying to remove some extent space can do even more harm. Also in case EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_DELALLOC_RESERVE was passed, remove space wrongly update quota information. Jan Kara suggests distinguishing between two cases:

1) The error is ENOSPC or EDQUOT - in this case the filesystem is fully consistent and we must maintain its consistency including all the accounting. However these errors can happen only early before we've inserted the extent into the extent tree. So current code works correctly for this case.

2) Some other error - this means metadata is corrupted. We should strive to do as few modifications as possible to limit damage. So I'd just skip freeing of allocated blocks.

[1] INFO: task syz.0.17:5995 blocked for more than 143 seconds. Call Trace: inode_lock_nested include/linux/fs.h:1073 [inline] __start_dirop fs/namei.c:2923 [inline] start_dirop fs/namei.c:2934 [inline]

CVSS v3
9.4
EG Score
9.4(medium)
EG Risk
47(Track)
EG Risk 47/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity94% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS
36.2%
KEV
Not listed

Published

April 22, 2026

Last Modified

July 14, 2026

Advisory Details (6)

Auto-updated May 1, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

ext4: avoid infinite loops caused by residual data - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ecc50bfca9b5c2ee6aeef998181689b80477367b
generic

ext4: avoid infinite loops caused by residual data - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c66545e83a802c3851d9be27a41c0479dd29ff0c
generic

ext4: avoid infinite loops caused by residual data - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/64f425b06b3bea9abc8977fd3982779b3ad070c9
generic

ext4: avoid infinite loops caused by residual data - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5422fe71d26d42af6c454ca9527faaad4e677d6c
generic

ext4: avoid infinite loops caused by residual data - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/416c86f30f91b4fb2642ef6b102596ca898f41a5
generic

ext4: avoid infinite loops caused by residual data - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3a7667595bcad84da53fc156a418e110267c3412

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-31448(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(1)

Vendor / EcosystemFixed in / PatchReleasedSource
linuxKernel @ 6.1.168osv

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 16× in last 7d / 47× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 229 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-07-24 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-23 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-23 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-23 03:08 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-07-22 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-22 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-21 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-21 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-20 23:32 UTCOSV refresh
  10. 2026-07-20 17:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-20 17:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-19 14:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-19 14:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-19 02:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-18 10:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-18 10:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-16 17:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-16 17:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-15 02:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-15 02:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-13 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-13 06:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-07-13 06:13 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-07-12 05:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-11 08:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-09 19:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-08 15:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-07 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-06 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-06 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-06 02:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-06 02:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-05 02:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-04 06:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-01 15:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-06-30 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-06-29 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-06-29 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-06-28 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-06-28 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-06-28 04:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-06-28 04:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-06-27 03:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-06-24 14:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-06-23 21:33 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-06-23 21:33 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-06-21 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-06-19 19:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-06-19 19:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-06-17 17:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-06-16 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-06-15 17:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-06-15 06:46 UTCVendor advisory
  39. 2026-06-15 06:46 UTCGHSA enrichment
  40. 2026-06-15 02:45 UTCVendor advisory
  41. 2026-06-15 02:45 UTCGHSA enrichment
  42. 2026-06-14 23:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-06-14 20:37 UTCVendor advisory
  44. 2026-06-14 20:37 UTCGHSA enrichment
  45. 2026-06-14 16:54 UTCVendor advisory
  46. 2026-06-14 16:54 UTCGHSA enrichment
  47. 2026-06-13 23:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-06-12 23:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-06-12 23:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-06-12 12:40 UTCVendor advisory
  51. 2026-06-12 12:40 UTCGHSA enrichment
  52. 2026-06-12 05:42 UTCVendor advisory
  53. 2026-06-12 05:42 UTCGHSA enrichment
  54. 2026-06-12 01:59 UTCVendor advisory
  55. 2026-06-12 01:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
  56. 2026-06-11 22:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
  57. 2026-06-11 18:32 UTCVendor advisory
  58. 2026-06-11 18:32 UTCGHSA enrichment
  59. 2026-06-11 14:49 UTCVendor advisory
  60. 2026-06-11 14:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
  61. 2026-06-11 14:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-06-10 23:08 UTCVendor advisory
  63. 2026-06-10 23:08 UTCGHSA enrichment
  64. 2026-06-10 22:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-06-10 19:24 UTCVendor advisory
  66. 2026-06-10 19:24 UTCGHSA enrichment
  67. 2026-06-10 15:40 UTCVendor advisory
  68. 2026-06-10 15:40 UTCGHSA enrichment
  69. 2026-06-10 13:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  70. 2026-06-10 11:57 UTCVendor advisory
  71. 2026-06-10 11:57 UTCGHSA enrichment
  72. 2026-06-10 08:14 UTCVendor advisory
  73. 2026-06-10 08:14 UTCGHSA enrichment
  74. 2026-06-10 03:49 UTCVendor advisory
  75. 2026-06-10 03:49 UTCGHSA enrichment

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-31448?
CVE-2026-31448 is a critical vulnerability published on April 22, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ext4: avoid infinite loops caused by residual data On the mkdir/mknod path, when mapping logical blocks to physical blocks, if inserting a new extent into the extent tree fails (in this example, because the file system disabled the…
When was CVE-2026-31448 disclosed?
CVE-2026-31448 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on April 22, 2026, with the most recent update on July 14, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-31448 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-31448 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 36.2% percentile likelihood of exploitation in the next 30 days — higher percentiles indicate greater predicted risk.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-31448?
CVE-2026-31448 has a CVSS v3 base score of 9.4 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-31448?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-31448, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-31448

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-31448?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.