LobeHub is an open source human-and-AI-agent network. Prior to version 1.143.3, the file upload feature in Knowledge Base > File Upload does not validate the integrity of the upload request, allowing users to intercept and modify the request parameters. As a result, it is possible to create arbitrary files in abnormal or unintended paths. In addition, since lobechat.com relies on the size parameter from the request to calculate file usage, an attacker can manipulate this value to misrepresent the actual file size, such as uploading a 1 GB file while reporting it as 10 MB, or falsely declaring a 10 MB file as a 1 GB file. By manipulating the size value provided in the client upload request, it is possible to bypass the monthly upload quota enforced by the server and continuously upload files beyond the intended storage and traffic limits. This abuse can result in a discrepancy between actual resource consumption and billing calculations, causing direct financial impact to the service operator. Additionally, exhaustion of storage or related resources may lead to degraded service availability, including failed uploads, delayed content delivery, or temporary suspension of upload functionality for legitimate users. A single malicious user can also negatively affect other users or projects sharing the same subscription plan, effectively causing an indirect denial of service (DoS). Furthermore, excessive and unaccounted-for uploads can distort monitoring metrics and overload downstream systems such as backup processes, malware scanning, and media processing pipelines, ultimately undermining overall operational stability and service reliability. Version 1.143.3 contains a patch for the issue.
CVE-2026-23835
“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.
This medium-severity CVE scores 5.7 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit probability: 0.4% (30th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.
Also known asEUVD-2026-5006 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-wrrr-8jcv-wjf5 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD
- CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 5.7
- EG Score
- 5.7MEDIUMmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 42EG Risk 42/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity57% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 5.7 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation40% × 40%EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.Automatability0% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines. - EPSS PROB
- 0.4%
- EPSS %ILE
- 30th
- KEV
- Not listed
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (5.7): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 5.7 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 5.7 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.NVD CVSS v3 · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
- EG Likelihood
- 0.4% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-31). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
January 30, 2026
Last Modified
June 17, 2026
Advisory Details (1)
Auto-updated Aug 7, 2026Improper Authorization in Presigned Upload: User-controlled object key enables cross-namespace upload attempts and quota bypass · Advisory · lobehub/lobehub · GitHub
https://github.com/lobehub/lobehub/security/advisories/GHSA-wrrr-8jcv-wjf5Patch Availability(1)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fix (by version range) / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| npm | @lobehub/chat @ 1.143.3 (fixes < 1.143.3) | — | ghsa |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(1 across 1 ecosystem)
npm(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| @lobehub/chat | — |
| — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 10× in last 7d / 41× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 99 of 231 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 1 repeat row among the latest 100 is merged into the row it repeats. The 132 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-11-02 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-11-01 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-11-01 07:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-wrrr-8jcv-wjf5 · GitHub severity MODERATE
- 2026-11-01 07:57 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-31 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-10-31 03:25 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-10-30 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-10-29 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-10-28 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-10-27 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-10-26 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-10-25 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-10-25 14:41 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-24 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-10-23 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-10-23 04:58 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-22 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-10-21 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-10-20 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-10-19 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-10-18 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-10-18 03:54 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-10-16 16:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-10-15 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
Show 74 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-14 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-10-13 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-10-12 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-10-12 16:20 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 20:02 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 17:16 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 14:47 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-10-08 18:05 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-10-08 17:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
- 2026-10-06 15:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
- 2026-10-05 17:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
- 2026-10-04 23:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
- 2026-10-01 19:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
- 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
- 2026-09-29 15:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
- 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
- 2026-09-27 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
- 2026-09-26 15:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 26th percentile
- 2026-09-26 00:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 25th percentile
- 2026-09-24 14:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 25th percentile
- 2026-09-20 20:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
- 2026-09-19 00:00 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-09-18 19:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
- 2026-09-16 14:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 27th percentile
- 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 27th percentile
- 2026-09-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 27th percentile
- 2026-09-12 15:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 27th percentile
- 2026-09-11 14:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 27th percentile
- 2026-09-10 09:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 27th percentile
- 2026-09-08 22:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 27th percentile
- 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 27th percentile
- 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 27th percentile
- 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 27th percentile
- 2026-09-02 14:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 27th percentile
- 2026-09-01 13:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 27th percentile
- 2026-09-01 04:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 27th percentile
- 2026-08-31 04:02 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 27th percentile
- 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
- 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 25th percentile
- 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 25th percentile
- 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 25th percentile
- 2026-08-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 25th percentile
- 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
- 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
- 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
- 2026-08-19 17:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 25th percentile
- 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 25th percentile
- 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 25th percentile
- 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 25th percentile
- 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 25th percentile
- 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 25th percentile
- 2026-08-14 11:51 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 25th percentile
- 2026-08-13 03:58 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-12 13:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 25th percentile
- 2026-08-11 13:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 25th percentile
- 2026-08-11 00:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 25th percentile
- 2026-08-09 16:21 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-09 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 25th percentile
- 2026-08-08 16:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 25th percentile
- 2026-08-07 23:08 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 25th percentile
- 2026-08-06 04:39 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-05 19:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 25th percentile
- 2026-08-04 15:10 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 25th percentile
- 2026-08-04 10:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 25th percentile
- 2026-08-03 10:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 25th percentile
- 2026-08-02 21:49 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-02 02:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 25th percentile
Related CVEs(same product + same CWE)
Same product
10 shownnpm:@lobehub/chat
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-23835?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-23835 published?
Is CVE-2026-23835 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-23835?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-23835?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-23835
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-23835?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.