CVE-2026-23198

MEDIUMNVD 5.55.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2026-02-14. NVD baseline CVSS 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3

Also known asEUVD-2026-5846 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-68jg-6v9h-662h (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

5.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.1%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

KVM: Don't clobber irqfd routing type when deassigning irqfd

When deassigning a KVM_IRQFD, don't clobber the irqfd's copy of the IRQ's routing entry as doing so breaks kvm_arch_irq_bypass_del_producer() on x86 and arm64, which explicitly look for KVM_IRQ_ROUTING_MSI. Instead, to handle a concurrent routing update, verify that the irqfd is still active before consuming the routing information. As evidenced by the x86 and arm64 bugs, and another bug in kvm_arch_update_irqfd_routing() (see below), clobbering the entry type without notifying arch code is surprising and error prone.

As a bonus, checking that the irqfd is active provides a convenient location for documenting _why_ KVM must not consume the routing entry for an irqfd that is in the process of being deassigned: once the irqfd is deleted from the list (which happens *before* the eventfd is detached), it will no longer receive updates via kvm_irq_routing_update(), and so KVM could deliver an event using stale routing information (relative to KVM_SET_GSI_ROUTING returning to userspace).

As an even better bonus, explicitly checking for the irqfd being active fixes a similar bug to the one the clobbering is trying to prevent: if an irqfd is deactivated, and then its routing is changed, kvm_irq_routing_update() won't invoke kvm_arch_update_irqfd_routing() (because the irqfd isn't in the list). And so if the irqfd is in bypass mode, IRQs will continue to be posted using the old routing information.

As for kvm_arch_irq_bypass_del_producer(), clobbering the routing type results in KVM incorrectly keeping the IRQ in bypass mode, which is especially problematic on AMD as KVM tracks IRQs that are being posted to a vCPU in a list whose lifetime is tied to the irqfd.

Without the help of KASAN to detect use-after-free, the most common sympton on AMD is a NULL pointer deref in amd_iommu_update_ga() due to the memory for irqfd structure being re-allocated and zeroed, resulting in irqfd->irq_bypass_data being NULL when read by avic_update_iommu_vcpu_affinity():

BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000018 #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page PGD 40cf2b9067 P4D 40cf2b9067 PUD 408362a067 PMD 0 Oops: Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP CPU: 6 UID: 0 PID: 40383 Comm: vfio_irq_test Tainted: G U W O 6.19.0-smp--5dddc257e6b2-irqfd #31 NONE Tainted: [U]=USER, [W]=WARN, [O]=OOT_MODULE Hardware name: Google, Inc. Arcadia_IT_80/Arcadia_IT_80, BIOS 34.78.2-0 09/05/2025 RIP: 0010:amd_iommu_update_ga+0x19/0xe0 Call Trace: avic_update_iommu_vcpu_affinity+0x3d/0x90 [kvm_amd] __avic_vcpu_load+0xf4/0x130 [kvm_amd] kvm_arch_vcpu_load+0x89/0x210 [kvm] vcpu_load+0x30/0x40 [kvm] kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0x45/0x620 [kvm] kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x571/0x6a0 [kvm] __se_sys_ioctl+0x6d/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x6f/0x9d0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 RIP: 0033:0x46893b ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---

If AVIC is inhibited when the irfd is deassigned, the bug will manifest as list corruption, e.g. on the next irqfd assignment.

list_add corruption. next->prev should be prev (ffff8d474d5cd588), but was 0000000000000000. (next=ffff8d8658f86530). ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at lib/list_debug.c:31! Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP CPU: 128 UID: 0 PID: 80818 Comm: vfio_irq_test Tainted: G U W O 6.19.0-smp--f19dc4d680ba-irqfd #28 NONE Tainted: [U]=USER, [W]=WARN, [O]=OOT_MODULE Hardware name: Google, Inc. Arcadia_IT_80/Arcadia_IT_80, BIOS 34.78.2-0 09/05/2025 RIP: 0010:__list_add_valid_or_report+0x97/0xc0 Call Trace: avic_pi_update_irte+0x28e/0x2b0 [kvm_amd] kvm_pi_update_irte+0xbf/0x190 [kvm] kvm_arch_irq_bypass_add_producer+0x72/0x90 [kvm] irq_bypass_register_consumer+0xcd/0x170 [irqbypa ---truncated---

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5MEDIUMmedium confidence
EG Risk
25
EG Risk 25/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity55% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 5.5 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.1% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.1%
EPSS %ILE
3rd
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (5.5): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 5.5 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
5.5 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.1% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-24). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

February 14, 2026

Last Modified

October 19, 2026

Advisory Details (7)

Auto-updated Jun 9, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

KVM: Don't clobber irqfd routing type when deassigning irqfd - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ff48c9312d042bfbe826ca675e98acc6c623211c
Web page

KVM: Don't clobber irqfd routing type when deassigning irqfd - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b61f9b2fcf181451d0a319889478cc53c001123e
Web page

KVM: Don't clobber irqfd routing type when deassigning irqfd - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b4d37cdb77a0015f51fee083598fa227cc07aaf1
Web page

KVM: Don't clobber irqfd routing type when deassigning irqfd - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/959a063e7f12524bc1871ad1f519787967bbcd45
Web page

KVM: Don't clobber irqfd routing type when deassigning irqfd - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6d14ba1e144e796b5fc81044f08cfba9024ca195
Web page

KVM: Don't clobber irqfd routing type when deassigning irqfd - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4385b2f2843549bfb932e0dcf76bf4b065543a3c
Web page

KVM: Don't clobber irqfd routing type when deassigning irqfd - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2284bc168b148a17b5ca3b37b3d95c411f18a08d

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-23198(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(16)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(5 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux5.10.103-1 ... 5.10.92-2 (49 versions)
  • every version up to 5.10.251-1: fixed in 5.10.251-1
—
linux-6.16.1.106-3~deb11u1 ... 6.1.162-1~deb11u1 (15 versions)
  • every version up to 6.1.164-1~deb11u1: fixed in 6.1.164-1~deb11u1
—
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 6.1.99-1 (47 versions)
  • every version up to 6.1.164-1: fixed in 6.1.164-1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.38-1 ... 6.12.73-1~bpo12+1 (12 versions)
  • every version up to 6.12.73-1: fixed in 6.12.73-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 6.18~rc7-1~exp1 (100 versions)
  • every version up to 6.18.10-1: fixed in 6.18.10-1
—

Weakness Classification(2)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

All Vendor Advisories

(15)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 8× in last 7d / 41× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 99 of 244 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 1 repeat row among the latest 100 is merged into the row it repeats. The 145 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-02 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  2. 2026-11-01 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  3. 2026-10-31 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  4. 2026-10-30 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  5. 2026-10-29 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  6. 2026-10-28 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  7. 2026-10-28 12:25 UTCOSV refresh
  8. 2026-10-27 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  9. 2026-10-26 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  10. 2026-10-25 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  11. 2026-10-25 14:41 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-24 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  13. 2026-10-23 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  14. 2026-10-22 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  15. 2026-10-21 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  16. 2026-10-20 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  17. 2026-10-19 19:37 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-10-19 19:37 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-68jg-6v9h-662h · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  19. 2026-10-19 18:30 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-10-19 18:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-68jg-6v9h-662h · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  21. 2026-10-19 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  22. 2026-10-18 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  23. 2026-10-18 03:54 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-10-17 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  25. 2026-10-16 16:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
Show 74 more
  1. 2026-10-15 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  2. 2026-10-14 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  3. 2026-10-13 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  4. 2026-10-12 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  5. 2026-10-12 16:21 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-11 20:03 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-11 17:16 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-11 14:48 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-10-11 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  10. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  11. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  12. 2026-10-08 17:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  13. 2026-10-08 15:54 UTCOSV refresh
  14. 2026-10-07 23:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  15. 2026-10-06 15:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  16. 2026-10-05 17:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  17. 2026-10-01 19:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  18. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  19. 2026-09-29 15:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  20. 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  21. 2026-09-27 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  22. 2026-09-26 15:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  23. 2026-09-26 00:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  24. 2026-09-24 14:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  25. 2026-09-20 20:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  26. 2026-09-18 21:42 UTCOSV refresh
  27. 2026-09-18 19:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  28. 2026-09-16 14:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  29. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  30. 2026-09-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  31. 2026-09-12 15:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  32. 2026-09-11 14:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  33. 2026-09-10 09:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  34. 2026-09-08 22:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  35. 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  36. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  37. 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  38. 2026-09-01 13:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  39. 2026-09-01 04:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  40. 2026-08-31 00:23 UTCOSV refresh
  41. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  42. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  43. 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  44. 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  45. 2026-08-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  46. 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  47. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  48. 2026-08-19 17:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  49. 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  50. 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  51. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  52. 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  53. 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  54. 2026-08-14 10:01 UTCEG score recompute
  55. 2026-08-14 10:01 UTCVendor advisory
  56. 2026-08-14 10:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-68jg-6v9h-662h · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  57. 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  58. 2026-08-13 02:20 UTCEG score recompute
  59. 2026-08-13 02:20 UTCVendor advisory
  60. 2026-08-13 02:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-68jg-6v9h-662h · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  61. 2026-08-12 13:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  62. 2026-08-11 13:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  63. 2026-08-11 07:52 UTCEG score recompute
  64. 2026-08-11 07:52 UTCVendor advisory
  65. 2026-08-11 07:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-68jg-6v9h-662h · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  66. 2026-08-11 00:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  67. 2026-08-09 14:35 UTCVendor advisory
  68. 2026-08-09 14:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-68jg-6v9h-662h · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  69. 2026-08-07 21:54 UTCEG score recompute
  70. 2026-08-07 21:54 UTCVendor advisory
  71. 2026-08-07 21:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-68jg-6v9h-662h · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  72. 2026-08-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  73. 2026-08-05 19:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  74. 2026-08-05 12:45 UTCEG score recompute

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-23198?
CVE-2026-23198 is a medium-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on February 14, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: KVM: Don't clobber irqfd routing type when deassigning irqfd When deassigning a KVM_IRQFD, don't clobber the irqfd's copy of the IRQ's routing entry as doing so breaks kvm_arch_irq_bypass_del_producer() on x86 and arm64, which…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-23198 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-23198 was published on February 14, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 19, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-23198 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-23198 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.1% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (3rd percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-23198?
CVE-2026-23198 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-23198?
A fix for CVE-2026-23198 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-23198 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-23198

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-23198?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.