CVE-2026-20316

CRITICALPre-NVD 5.39.0
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

“▲” beside the score: it is higher than the CVSS score beside it.

Score elevated to 9.0 because this CVE is listed on the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog (added 2026-07-29), indicating real-world exploitation has been confirmed by US federal agencies. It is also listed on ENISA's EU Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalogue (Source: ENISA EUVD). A secondary CVSS source baseline 5.3 retained for reference (NVD's own analysis pending). The 9.0 is the floor for confirmed exploitation, not an impact rating: this CVE's impact severity (EG Severity) is CVSS 5.3 MEDIUM under GitHub Security Advisory CVSS. Confidence: HIGH.

Triggered by: CISA KEV (actively exploited)
Sources: CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, EPSS, ENISA's EU Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalogue, GitHub Security Advisory, a secondary CVSS source
Trending — 3 sources updated this weekExploited in the wild

Also known asEUVD-2026-50404 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-x85f-hvgg-4944 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.0EG
EchelonGraph verdictMitigate nowTreat as an emergency — this is being exploited.
  • Actively exploited in the wild (CISA-KEV) — the reason this is sooner than the SSVC decision on this page at low or medium mission impact
CISA-KEV: ExploitedENISA EU KEV: Listed (Source: ENISA EUVD)EPSS PROB: 35%CVSS: 5.3Exploit: No code on recordExposed services: Not assessed

No fix is confirmed yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for the fix.

A vulnerability in the web interface of Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to log in to an affected device using a low-privileged account to access sensitive data within the impacted systems. This vulnerability is due to the presence of static user credentials for a low-privileged account. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by using the account to log in to an affected system. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to log in to the affected system and access sensitive data as the low-privileged user.  Note: If the FMC management interface does not have public internet access, the attack surface that is associated with this vulnerability is reduced.   Cisco has assigned this security advisory a Security Impact Rating (SIR) of High rather than Medium as the score indicates. The reason is that this vulnerability can be used with other Cisco Secure FMC Software vulnerabilities to elevate privileges.

CVSS v3
5.3
EG Score
9.0CRITICALhigh confidence
EG Risk
79
EG Risk 79/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity53% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 5.3 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation100% × 40%
Fixed at 100% for a CISA KEV listing: EchelonGraph's rule.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Attend at low or medium mission impact; Act at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation active (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: No fix is confirmed yet. Check the vendor's advisory for a fixed release; until one is applied, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation sooner than your normal schedule at low or medium mission impact and as soon as possible at high.
EPSS PROB
35%
EPSS %ILE
98th
KEV
⚠ Exploited

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.0): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.0 is the CISA KEV floor for confirmed exploitation, not an impact rating: its impact severity (EG Severity) is CVSS 5.3 MEDIUM.

EG Severity
5.3 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
35% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-01). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
CISA KEV and ENISA EU KEV (Source: ENISA EUVD) and EG-KEV Tier 1 (exploited in the wild)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Attend at medium mission impactAttend at low or medium mission impact; Act at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 14 days if it is not.No released fix is confirmed on this page, but CISA's timeline does not wait for a fix's release: this CVE is in CISA's KEV catalog, and CISA's required action for it, quoted below, applies whether or not a fix is released.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

ENISA EU KEV: listed September 9, 2026, reported by ENISA.

Source: ENISA EUVD (EU Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalogue), reproduced with acknowledgement. How a listing moves the EG score

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Attend at low or medium mission impact; Act at high (mission-essential systems).

No fix is confirmed yet. Check the vendor's advisory for a fixed release; until one is applied, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation sooner than your normal schedule at low or medium mission impact and as soon as possible at high.

Exploitation active (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 14 days if it is not.

No released fix is confirmed on this page, but CISA's timeline does not wait for a fix's release: this CVE is in CISA's KEV catalog, and CISA's required action for it, quoted below, applies whether or not a fix is released.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV yes (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

CISA required action“Apply mitigations in accordance with vendor instructions, ensuring compliance with CISA’s BOD 26-04 Prioritizing Security Updates Based on Risk (see URL in Notes) guidance and CISA’s “Forensics Triage Requirements” (see URL in Notes). Follow applicable BOD 26-04 guidance for cloud services or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable. Stakeholders are responsible for evaluating each asset's internet exposure and ensuring adherence to BOD 26-04 patching guidelines.”

Quoted verbatim from CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. CISA directs it at US federal civilian executive branch agencies under Binding Operational Directive (BOD) 26-04, which replaced BOD 22-01 on 10 June 2026; it is not EchelonGraph's advice. CISA's notes: https://sec.cloudapps.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-fmc-static-cred-BET3Cjh · https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/directives/bod-26-04-prioritizing-security-updates-based-risk · https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/directives/bod-26-04-implementation-guidance-prioritizing-security-updates-based-risk · https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-20316

Published

July 29, 2026

Last Modified

October 24, 2026

Advisory Details (2)

Auto-updated Nov 1, 2026
⚠️ Actively exploited (CISA KEV, CISA Vulnrichment). No fix on record yet. Sources: cisa.
CISA🔴 Active Exploitation

Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog | CISA

Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog | CISA. Listed in CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog.

https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2026-20316
Web page

Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center Software Static Credential Vulnerability

https://sec.cloudapps.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-fmc-static-cred-BET3Cjh

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-20316(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 19× in last 7d / 128× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 675 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 575 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-02 01:04 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-11-02 01:04 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x85f-hvgg-4944 · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  3. 2026-10-31 23:26 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-31 23:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x85f-hvgg-4944 · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  5. 2026-10-31 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 35% · 98th percentile
  6. 2026-10-30 21:50 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-30 21:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x85f-hvgg-4944 · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  8. 2026-10-30 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 35% · 98th percentile
  9. 2026-10-29 20:14 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-29 20:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x85f-hvgg-4944 · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  11. 2026-10-29 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 35% · 98th percentile
  12. 2026-10-28 18:38 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-28 18:37 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x85f-hvgg-4944 · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  14. 2026-10-28 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 35% · 98th percentile
  15. 2026-10-27 17:00 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-10-27 16:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x85f-hvgg-4944 · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  17. 2026-10-27 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 35% · 98th percentile
  18. 2026-10-26 15:22 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-10-26 15:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x85f-hvgg-4944 · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  20. 2026-10-25 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 35% · 98th percentile
  21. 2026-10-25 13:47 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-10-25 13:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x85f-hvgg-4944 · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  23. 2026-10-25 13:46 UTCENISA EU KEV listingEUVD-2026-50404 · listed September 9, 2026 · reported by ENISA · Source: ENISA EUVD
  24. 2026-10-24 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 35% · 98th percentile
  25. 2026-10-24 13:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x85f-hvgg-4944 · GitHub CVSS 5.3
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-24 02:58 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-24 02:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x85f-hvgg-4944 · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  3. 2026-10-23 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 35% · 98th percentile
  4. 2026-10-23 01:22 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-23 01:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x85f-hvgg-4944 · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  6. 2026-10-22 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 35% · 98th percentile
  7. 2026-10-21 23:45 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-21 23:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x85f-hvgg-4944 · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  9. 2026-10-21 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 35% · 98th percentile
  10. 2026-10-20 22:08 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-20 22:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x85f-hvgg-4944 · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  12. 2026-10-20 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 35% · 98th percentile
  13. 2026-10-19 20:30 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-19 20:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x85f-hvgg-4944 · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  15. 2026-10-19 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 35% · 98th percentile
  16. 2026-10-18 18:51 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-10-18 18:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x85f-hvgg-4944 · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  18. 2026-10-18 03:57 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-10-17 17:13 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-10-17 17:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x85f-hvgg-4944 · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  21. 2026-10-17 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 35% · 98th percentile
  22. 2026-10-16 16:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 35% · 98th percentile
  23. 2026-10-16 15:36 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-10-16 15:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x85f-hvgg-4944 · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  25. 2026-10-15 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 35% · 98th percentile
  26. 2026-10-15 13:59 UTCEG score recompute
  27. 2026-10-15 13:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x85f-hvgg-4944 · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  28. 2026-10-14 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 35% · 98th percentile
  29. 2026-10-14 12:22 UTCEG score recompute
  30. 2026-10-14 12:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x85f-hvgg-4944 · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  31. 2026-10-13 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 35% · 98th percentile
  32. 2026-10-13 10:45 UTCEG score recompute
  33. 2026-10-13 10:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x85f-hvgg-4944 · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  34. 2026-10-12 16:24 UTCEG score recompute
  35. 2026-10-12 09:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x85f-hvgg-4944 · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  36. 2026-10-12 04:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x85f-hvgg-4944 · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  37. 2026-10-12 00:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x85f-hvgg-4944 · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  38. 2026-10-11 20:34 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x85f-hvgg-4944 · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  39. 2026-10-11 20:05 UTCEG score recompute
  40. 2026-10-11 17:18 UTCEG score recompute
  41. 2026-10-11 16:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x85f-hvgg-4944 · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  42. 2026-10-11 14:50 UTCEG score recompute
  43. 2026-10-11 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 35% · 98th percentile
  44. 2026-10-11 12:11 UTCEG score recompute
  45. 2026-10-11 12:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x85f-hvgg-4944 · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  46. 2026-10-11 07:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x85f-hvgg-4944 · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  47. 2026-10-11 03:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x85f-hvgg-4944 · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  48. 2026-10-10 23:33 UTCEG score recompute
  49. 2026-10-10 23:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x85f-hvgg-4944 · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  50. 2026-10-10 19:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 35% · 98th percentile
  51. 2026-10-10 19:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x85f-hvgg-4944 · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  52. 2026-10-10 15:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x85f-hvgg-4944 · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  53. 2026-10-10 10:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x85f-hvgg-4944 · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  54. 2026-10-10 06:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x85f-hvgg-4944 · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  55. 2026-10-10 02:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x85f-hvgg-4944 · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  56. 2026-10-09 22:25 UTCEG score recompute
  57. 2026-10-09 22:24 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x85f-hvgg-4944 · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  58. 2026-10-09 20:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 35% · 98th percentile
  59. 2026-10-09 18:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x85f-hvgg-4944 · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  60. 2026-10-09 14:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x85f-hvgg-4944 · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  61. 2026-10-09 09:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x85f-hvgg-4944 · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  62. 2026-10-09 05:34 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x85f-hvgg-4944 · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  63. 2026-10-09 01:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x85f-hvgg-4944 · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  64. 2026-10-08 21:12 UTCEG score recompute
  65. 2026-10-08 21:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x85f-hvgg-4944 · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  66. 2026-10-08 17:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 35% · 98th percentile
  67. 2026-10-08 17:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x85f-hvgg-4944 · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  68. 2026-10-08 12:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x85f-hvgg-4944 · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  69. 2026-10-08 08:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x85f-hvgg-4944 · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  70. 2026-10-08 04:24 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x85f-hvgg-4944 · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  71. 2026-10-08 00:13 UTCEG score recompute
  72. 2026-10-08 00:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x85f-hvgg-4944 · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  73. 2026-10-07 23:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 35% · 98th percentile
  74. 2026-10-07 20:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x85f-hvgg-4944 · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  75. 2026-10-07 15:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x85f-hvgg-4944 · GitHub CVSS 5.3

Frequently asked(6)

What is CVE-2026-20316?
CVE-2026-20316 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on July 29, 2026. A vulnerability in the web interface of Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to log in to an affected device using a low-privileged account to access sensitive data within the impacted systems. This vulnerability is due to the…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-20316 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-20316 was published on July 29, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 24, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-20316 actively exploited?
Yes. CISA added CVE-2026-20316 to the Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog on July 29, 2026, affecting Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC). KEV listing indicates confirmed exploitation in the wild; this CVE warrants immediate attention. No fix is confirmed yet. Check the vendor's advisory for a fixed release; until one is applied, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation. ENISA's EU Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalogue lists CVE-2026-20316 (added September 9, 2026, reported by ENISA): ENISA records its exploitation in the wild. Source: ENISA EUVD (EU Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalogue), reproduced with acknowledgement.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-20316?
CVE-2026-20316 has a CVSS base score of 5.3 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending). EchelonGraph synthesises a secondary CVSS source + CISA KEV + ENISA's EU KEV (Source: ENISA EUVD) + FIRST EPSS + GHSA into a combined EG score of 9.0 (CRITICAL).
Which products are affected by CVE-2026-20316?
CVE-2026-20316 affects Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-20316?
No fix for CVE-2026-20316 is confirmed yet. Until one is published, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation — for example, keep it off the internet or limit it to trusted networks — and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-20316 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-20316

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-20316?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.