CVE-2026-20079

CRITICALPre-NVD 10.010.0
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score elevated to 10.0 because this CVE is listed on the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog (added 2026-09-09), indicating real-world exploitation has been confirmed by US federal agencies. It is also listed on ENISA's EU Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalogue (Source: ENISA EUVD). The CNA's CVSS baseline 10.0 retained for reference (NVD's own analysis pending). Confidence: HIGH.

Triggered by: CISA KEV (actively exploited)
Sources: CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, the CNA's CVSS, EPSS, ENISA's EU Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalogue, GitHub Security Advisory
Trending — 3 sources updated this weekExploited in the wild

Also known asEUVD-2026-9438 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-mv8w-c2qv-cgrg (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

10.0EG
EchelonGraph verdictMitigate nowTreat as an emergency — this is being exploited.
  • Actively exploited in the wild (CISA-KEV) — the reason this is sooner than the SSVC decision on this page at low mission impact
CISA-KEV: ExploitedENISA EU KEV: Listed (Source: ENISA EUVD)EPSS PROB: 89%CVSS: 10.0Exploit: Metasploit · other public PoCExposed services: Not assessed

No fix is confirmed yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for the fix.

A vulnerability in the web interface of Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass authentication and execute script files on an affected device to obtain root access to the underlying operating system.  This vulnerability is due to an improper system process that is created at boot time. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted HTTP requests to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute a variety of scripts and commands that allow root access to the device. 

CVSS v3
10.0
EG Score
10.0CRITICALhigh confidence
EG Risk
100
EG Risk 100/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity100% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 10.0 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation100% × 40%
Fixed at 100% for a CISA KEV listing: EchelonGraph's rule.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Attend at low mission impact; Act at medium or high.
Exploitation active (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: No fix is confirmed yet. Check the vendor's advisory for a fixed release; until one is applied, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation sooner than your normal schedule at low mission impact and as soon as possible at medium or high.
EPSS PROB
89%
EPSS %ILE
99th
KEV
⚠ Exploited

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (10.0): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 10.0 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
10.0 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
89% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-01). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
CISA KEV and ENISA EU KEV (Source: ENISA EUVD) and EG-KEV Tier 1 (exploited in the wild)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Act at medium mission impactAttend at low mission impact; Act at medium or high.CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days & forensic triage if the affected system is publicly exposed; 3 days & forensic triage if it is not.No released fix is confirmed on this page, but CISA's timeline does not wait for a fix's release: this CVE is in CISA's KEV catalog, and CISA's required action for it, quoted below, applies whether or not a fix is released.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

ENISA EU KEV: listed September 9, 2026, reported by ENISA.

Source: ENISA EUVD (EU Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalogue), reproduced with acknowledgement. How a listing moves the EG score

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Attend at low mission impact; Act at medium or high.

No fix is confirmed yet. Check the vendor's advisory for a fixed release; until one is applied, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation sooner than your normal schedule at low mission impact and as soon as possible at medium or high.

Exploitation active (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days & forensic triage if the affected system is publicly exposed; 3 days & forensic triage if it is not.

No released fix is confirmed on this page, but CISA's timeline does not wait for a fix's release: this CVE is in CISA's KEV catalog, and CISA's required action for it, quoted below, applies whether or not a fix is released.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV yes (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

CISA required action“Apply mitigations in accordance with vendor instructions, ensuring compliance with CISA’s BOD 26-04 Prioritizing Security Updates Based on Risk (see URL in Notes) guidance and CISA’s “Forensics Triage Requirements” (see URL in Notes). Follow applicable BOD 26-04 guidance for cloud services or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable. Stakeholders are responsible for evaluating each asset's internet exposure and ensuring adherence to BOD 26-04 patching guidelines.”

Quoted verbatim from CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. CISA directs it at US federal civilian executive branch agencies under Binding Operational Directive (BOD) 26-04, which replaced BOD 22-01 on 10 June 2026; it is not EchelonGraph's advice. CISA's notes: https://sec.cloudapps.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-onprem-fmc-authbypass-5JPp45V2 · https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/directives/bod-26-04-prioritizing-security-updates-based-risk · https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/directives/bod-26-04-implementation-guidance-prioritizing-security-updates-based-risk · https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-20079

Published

March 4, 2026

Last Modified

September 16, 2026

Advisory Details (4)

Auto-updated Oct 29, 2026
⚠️ Actively exploited (CISA KEV, CISA Vulnrichment). No fix on record yet.
Web page

Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center Software Authentication Bypass Vulnerability

https://sec.cloudapps.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-onprem-fmc-authbypass-5JPp45V2
CISA🔴 Active Exploitation

Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog | CISA

Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog | CISA. Listed in CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog.

https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2026-20079
Web page

Active exploitation of Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center vulnerabilities

https://blog.talosintelligence.com/fmc-ongoing-exploitation/
Web page

Full Disclosure: CVE-2026-20079 - Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center Authentication Bypass to Root RCE

http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2026/Aug/80

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 16× in last 7d / 114× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 381 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 281 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-01 19:34 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-11-01 19:34 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mv8w-c2qv-cgrg · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
  3. 2026-10-31 18:45 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-31 18:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mv8w-c2qv-cgrg · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
  5. 2026-10-30 17:55 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-30 17:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mv8w-c2qv-cgrg · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
  7. 2026-10-30 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 89% · 99th percentile
  8. 2026-10-29 17:06 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-10-29 17:06 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mv8w-c2qv-cgrg · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
  10. 2026-10-28 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 88% · 99th percentile
  11. 2026-10-28 16:17 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-28 16:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mv8w-c2qv-cgrg · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
  13. 2026-10-27 15:27 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-27 15:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mv8w-c2qv-cgrg · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
  15. 2026-10-26 14:37 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-10-26 14:37 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mv8w-c2qv-cgrg · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
  17. 2026-10-25 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 88% · 99th percentile
  18. 2026-10-25 13:47 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-10-25 13:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mv8w-c2qv-cgrg · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
  20. 2026-10-25 13:46 UTCENISA EU KEV listingEUVD-2026-9438 · listed September 9, 2026 · reported by ENISA · Source: ENISA EUVD
  21. 2026-10-24 17:58 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-10-24 17:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mv8w-c2qv-cgrg · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
  23. 2026-10-23 17:09 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-10-23 17:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mv8w-c2qv-cgrg · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
  25. 2026-10-22 16:17 UTCEG score recompute
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-22 16:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mv8w-c2qv-cgrg · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
  2. 2026-10-21 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 88% · 99th percentile
  3. 2026-10-21 15:26 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-21 15:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mv8w-c2qv-cgrg · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
  5. 2026-10-20 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 88% · 99th percentile
  6. 2026-10-20 14:37 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-20 14:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mv8w-c2qv-cgrg · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
  8. 2026-10-19 13:47 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-10-19 13:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mv8w-c2qv-cgrg · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
  10. 2026-10-18 12:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mv8w-c2qv-cgrg · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
  11. 2026-10-18 03:57 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-17 12:07 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-17 12:07 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mv8w-c2qv-cgrg · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
  14. 2026-10-16 11:18 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-10-16 11:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mv8w-c2qv-cgrg · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
  16. 2026-10-15 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 88% · 99th percentile
  17. 2026-10-15 10:26 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-10-15 10:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mv8w-c2qv-cgrg · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
  19. 2026-10-14 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 88% · 99th percentile
  20. 2026-10-14 09:36 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-10-14 09:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mv8w-c2qv-cgrg · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
  22. 2026-10-13 08:46 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-10-13 08:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mv8w-c2qv-cgrg · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
  24. 2026-10-12 16:24 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-10-12 07:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mv8w-c2qv-cgrg · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
  26. 2026-10-12 03:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mv8w-c2qv-cgrg · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
  27. 2026-10-11 23:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mv8w-c2qv-cgrg · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
  28. 2026-10-11 19:36 UTCEG score recompute
  29. 2026-10-11 19:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mv8w-c2qv-cgrg · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
  30. 2026-10-11 17:19 UTCEG score recompute
  31. 2026-10-11 15:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mv8w-c2qv-cgrg · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
  32. 2026-10-11 14:51 UTCEG score recompute
  33. 2026-10-11 11:28 UTCEG score recompute
  34. 2026-10-11 11:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mv8w-c2qv-cgrg · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
  35. 2026-10-11 07:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mv8w-c2qv-cgrg · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
  36. 2026-10-11 03:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mv8w-c2qv-cgrg · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
  37. 2026-10-10 23:12 UTCEG score recompute
  38. 2026-10-10 23:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mv8w-c2qv-cgrg · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
  39. 2026-10-10 19:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 88% · 99th percentile
  40. 2026-10-10 19:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mv8w-c2qv-cgrg · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
  41. 2026-10-10 15:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mv8w-c2qv-cgrg · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
  42. 2026-10-10 10:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mv8w-c2qv-cgrg · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
  43. 2026-10-10 06:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mv8w-c2qv-cgrg · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
  44. 2026-10-10 02:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mv8w-c2qv-cgrg · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
  45. 2026-10-09 22:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mv8w-c2qv-cgrg · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
  46. 2026-10-09 18:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mv8w-c2qv-cgrg · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
  47. 2026-10-09 14:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mv8w-c2qv-cgrg · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
  48. 2026-10-09 10:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mv8w-c2qv-cgrg · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
  49. 2026-10-09 06:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mv8w-c2qv-cgrg · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
  50. 2026-10-09 02:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mv8w-c2qv-cgrg · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
  51. 2026-10-08 22:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mv8w-c2qv-cgrg · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
  52. 2026-10-08 18:07 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mv8w-c2qv-cgrg · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
  53. 2026-10-08 14:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mv8w-c2qv-cgrg · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
  54. 2026-10-08 09:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mv8w-c2qv-cgrg · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
  55. 2026-10-08 05:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mv8w-c2qv-cgrg · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
  56. 2026-10-08 01:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mv8w-c2qv-cgrg · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
  57. 2026-10-07 21:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mv8w-c2qv-cgrg · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
  58. 2026-10-07 17:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mv8w-c2qv-cgrg · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
  59. 2026-10-07 13:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mv8w-c2qv-cgrg · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
  60. 2026-10-07 09:31 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mv8w-c2qv-cgrg · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
  61. 2026-10-07 05:25 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mv8w-c2qv-cgrg · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
  62. 2026-10-07 01:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mv8w-c2qv-cgrg · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
  63. 2026-10-06 21:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mv8w-c2qv-cgrg · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
  64. 2026-10-06 17:13 UTCEG score recompute
  65. 2026-10-06 17:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mv8w-c2qv-cgrg · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
  66. 2026-10-06 15:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 88% · 99th percentile
  67. 2026-10-06 13:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mv8w-c2qv-cgrg · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
  68. 2026-10-06 09:04 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mv8w-c2qv-cgrg · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
  69. 2026-10-06 05:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mv8w-c2qv-cgrg · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
  70. 2026-10-06 00:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mv8w-c2qv-cgrg · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
  71. 2026-10-05 20:52 UTCEG score recompute
  72. 2026-10-05 20:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mv8w-c2qv-cgrg · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
  73. 2026-10-05 17:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 88% · 99th percentile
  74. 2026-10-05 16:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mv8w-c2qv-cgrg · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
  75. 2026-10-05 12:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mv8w-c2qv-cgrg · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0

Publicly available exploits

(4 references)

Public exploit code is referenced for this CVE (1 Metasploit module, 2 GitHub PoCs), as is 1 Nuclei detection template. A detection template checks whether a system is affected; it is not necessarily exploit code. No fix is confirmed yet, so defenders should restrict or isolate affected systems accordingly until one is published.

  • Metasploitexploit/linux/http/cisco_fmc_auth_bypass_rce✓ verified
    Published Sep 9, 2026

    Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center Authentication Bypass RCE

    Open source ↗
  • GitHub PoCCyberAuth/CVE-2026-20079
    Published Aug 17, 2026

    Python proof of concept for CVE-2026-20079 affecting Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center.

    Open source ↗
  • Nucleihttp/cves/2026/CVE-2026-20079.yaml
    Published Apr 13, 2026

    Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center - Authentication Bypass

    Open source ↗
  • GitHub PoC0xBlackash/CVE-2026-20079
    Published Mar 28, 2026

    CVE-2026-20079

    Open source ↗

Frequently asked(6)

What is CVE-2026-20079?
CVE-2026-20079 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on March 4, 2026. A vulnerability in the web interface of Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass authentication and execute script files on an affected device to obtain root access to the underlying operating system.  This vulnerability…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-20079 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-20079 was published on March 4, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of September 16, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-20079 actively exploited?
Yes. CISA added CVE-2026-20079 to the Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog on September 9, 2026, affecting Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) and Security Cloud Control (SCC) Firewall Management. KEV listing indicates confirmed exploitation in the wild; this CVE warrants immediate attention. No fix is confirmed yet. Check the vendor's advisory for a fixed release; until one is applied, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation. ENISA's EU Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalogue lists CVE-2026-20079 (added September 9, 2026, reported by ENISA): ENISA records its exploitation in the wild. Source: ENISA EUVD (EU Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalogue), reproduced with acknowledgement.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-20079?
CVE-2026-20079 has a CVSS base score of 10.0 (the CNA's own assessment, by cisco; NVD's own analysis pending).
Which products are affected by CVE-2026-20079?
CVE-2026-20079 affects Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) and Security Cloud Control (SCC) Firewall Management.
How do I remediate CVE-2026-20079?
No fix for CVE-2026-20079 is confirmed yet. Until one is published, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation — for example, keep it off the internet or limit it to trusted networks — and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-20079 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-20079

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-20079?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.