CVE-2026-18453

HIGHPre-NVD 7.57.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 7.5 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-09-07. A secondary CVSS source baseline 7.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, a secondary CVSS source
Trending — 4 sources updated this week

Also known asEUVD-2026-72456 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-42wr-8m7m-5j62 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

7.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.8%CVSS: 7.5Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

A flaw was found in 389 Directory Server. A missing NULL pointer check in the paged results handling of op_shared_search allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to crash the LDAP server by sending a crafted sequence of search requests using the USE_ONE_BACKEND control, resulting in denial of service.

CVSS v3
7.5
EG Score
7.5HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
49
EG Risk 49/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity75% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 7.5 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.9% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
0.8%
EPSS %ILE
58th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (7.5): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 7.5 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
7.5 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.8% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-29). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

September 7, 2026

Last Modified

October 8, 2026

Advisory Details (2)

Auto-updated Sep 7, 2026
Patch available. Sources: redhat.
Red Hat

2509696 – (CVE-2026-18453) CVE-2026-18453 389-ds-base: 389-ds-base: pre-authentication NULL pointer dereference via paged results and USE_ONE_BACKEND control in op_shared_search

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2509696
Red HatMentions a patch (unverified)

CVE-2026-18453 - Red Hat Customer Portal

Affected: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 or OpenShift Container Platform 4, is affected by this vulnerability and a fix may be released to a

https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-18453

Patch Availability(17)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
redhatredhat-ds:11-8060020260908152739.0ca98e7e2026-10-08redhat
redhatredhat-ds:12-9020020260903155914.1674d5742026-09-08redhat
redhat389-ds-base-0:3.0.6-21.el10_02026-09-08redhat
redhat389-ds-base-0:1.3.11.1-15.el7_92026-09-08redhat
redhat389-ds:1.4-8040020260901171549.96015a922026-09-08redhat
redhat389-ds-base-0:2.2.4-22.el9_22026-09-08redhat
redhatredhat-ds:12-9040020260903102623.1674d5742026-09-08redhat
redhat389-ds-base-0:3.2.0-10.el10_22026-09-08redhat
redhat389-ds-base-0:2.6.1-24.el9_62026-09-08redhat
redhat389-ds-base-0:2.4.5-29.el9_42026-09-08redhat
redhatredhat-ds:11-8100020260904171440.37ed7c032026-09-08redhat
redhat389-ds:1.4-8100020260904155442.25e700aa2026-09-08redhat
redhatredhat-ds:11-8080020260903102346.f969626e2026-09-08redhat
redhat389-ds:1.4-8080020260831180218.6dbb38032026-09-08redhat
redhatdirsrv/dirsrv-container-rhel10:17888517652026-09-08redhat
redhat389-ds:1.4-8060020260901145727.824efc522026-09-08redhat
redhat389-ds-base-0:2.8.0-10.el9_82026-09-08redhat

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(2 across 2 ecosystems)
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
389-ds-base2.3.1+dfsg1-1 ... 3.3.1-3 (18 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
389-ds-base3.1.2+dfsg1-1 ... 3.3.1-3 (8 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 10× in last 7d / 82× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 236 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 136 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-01 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 58th percentile
  2. 2026-10-31 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 58th percentile
  3. 2026-10-30 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 58th percentile
  4. 2026-10-30 12:55 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-30 12:55 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-10-30 12:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-42wr-8m7m-5j62 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  7. 2026-10-29 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 57th percentile
  8. 2026-10-28 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 57th percentile
  9. 2026-10-27 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 57th percentile
  10. 2026-10-26 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 57th percentile
  11. 2026-10-25 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 57th percentile
  12. 2026-10-25 14:45 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-24 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 57th percentile
  14. 2026-10-24 03:18 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-10-24 03:18 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-10-24 03:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-42wr-8m7m-5j62 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  17. 2026-10-23 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 57th percentile
  18. 2026-10-22 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 57th percentile
  19. 2026-10-21 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 57th percentile
  20. 2026-10-20 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 57th percentile
  21. 2026-10-19 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 57th percentile
  22. 2026-10-18 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 57th percentile
  23. 2026-10-18 03:58 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-10-17 17:50 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-10-17 17:50 UTCVendor advisory
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-17 17:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-42wr-8m7m-5j62 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  2. 2026-10-17 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 57th percentile
  3. 2026-10-16 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 57th percentile
  4. 2026-10-15 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 57th percentile
  5. 2026-10-14 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 57th percentile
  6. 2026-10-13 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 56th percentile
  7. 2026-10-12 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 56th percentile
  8. 2026-10-12 16:27 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-10-11 20:07 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-11 17:20 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-11 14:52 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-11 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 56th percentile
  13. 2026-10-10 19:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 56th percentile
  14. 2026-10-10 11:08 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-10-10 11:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-42wr-8m7m-5j62 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  16. 2026-10-09 22:42 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-10-09 22:42 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-10-09 22:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-42wr-8m7m-5j62 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  19. 2026-10-09 20:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 56th percentile
  20. 2026-10-09 03:50 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-10-09 03:50 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-10-09 03:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-42wr-8m7m-5j62 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  23. 2026-10-08 17:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 56th percentile
  24. 2026-10-08 15:24 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-10-08 15:24 UTCVendor advisory
  26. 2026-10-08 15:24 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-42wr-8m7m-5j62 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  27. 2026-10-08 14:56 UTCEG score recompute
  28. 2026-10-08 14:56 UTCVendor advisory
  29. 2026-10-08 14:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-42wr-8m7m-5j62 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  30. 2026-10-08 01:43 UTCEG score recompute
  31. 2026-10-08 01:43 UTCVendor advisory
  32. 2026-10-08 01:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-42wr-8m7m-5j62 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  33. 2026-10-07 23:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 56th percentile
  34. 2026-10-07 13:16 UTCVendor advisory
  35. 2026-10-07 13:15 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-42wr-8m7m-5j62 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  36. 2026-10-06 23:45 UTCEG score recompute
  37. 2026-10-06 23:45 UTCVendor advisory
  38. 2026-10-06 23:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-42wr-8m7m-5j62 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  39. 2026-10-06 15:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 56th percentile
  40. 2026-10-06 11:20 UTCVendor advisory
  41. 2026-10-06 11:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-42wr-8m7m-5j62 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  42. 2026-10-05 22:54 UTCEG score recompute
  43. 2026-10-05 22:54 UTCVendor advisory
  44. 2026-10-05 22:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-42wr-8m7m-5j62 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  45. 2026-10-05 17:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 56th percentile
  46. 2026-10-05 08:59 UTCEG score recompute
  47. 2026-10-05 08:59 UTCVendor advisory
  48. 2026-10-05 08:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-42wr-8m7m-5j62 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  49. 2026-10-04 23:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 56th percentile
  50. 2026-10-04 20:31 UTCVendor advisory
  51. 2026-10-04 20:31 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-42wr-8m7m-5j62 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  52. 2026-10-04 07:38 UTCVendor advisory
  53. 2026-10-04 07:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-42wr-8m7m-5j62 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  54. 2026-10-03 19:13 UTCEG score recompute
  55. 2026-10-03 19:13 UTCVendor advisory
  56. 2026-10-03 19:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-42wr-8m7m-5j62 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  57. 2026-10-03 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 56th percentile
  58. 2026-10-03 06:46 UTCVendor advisory
  59. 2026-10-03 06:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-42wr-8m7m-5j62 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  60. 2026-10-02 18:20 UTCEG score recompute
  61. 2026-10-02 18:20 UTCVendor advisory
  62. 2026-10-02 18:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-42wr-8m7m-5j62 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  63. 2026-10-02 05:55 UTCEG score recompute
  64. 2026-10-02 05:55 UTCVendor advisory
  65. 2026-10-02 05:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-42wr-8m7m-5j62 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  66. 2026-10-01 19:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 56th percentile
  67. 2026-10-01 16:08 UTCVendor advisory
  68. 2026-10-01 16:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-42wr-8m7m-5j62 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  69. 2026-10-01 03:43 UTCVendor advisory
  70. 2026-10-01 03:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-42wr-8m7m-5j62 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  71. 2026-09-30 15:18 UTCEG score recompute
  72. 2026-09-30 15:18 UTCVendor advisory
  73. 2026-09-30 15:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-42wr-8m7m-5j62 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  74. 2026-09-30 15:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 56th percentile
  75. 2026-09-30 02:30 UTCEG score recompute

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-18453?
CVE-2026-18453 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on September 7, 2026. A flaw was found in 389 Directory Server. A missing NULL pointer check in the paged results handling of op_shared_search allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to crash the LDAP server by sending a crafted sequence of search requests using the USE_ONE_BACKEND control, resulting in denial of…
When was CVE-2026-18453 made public?
CVE-2026-18453 was made public on September 7, 2026: that is the date its CVE record's CNA, Red Hat, Inc., gives for when the vulnerability was made public. The CVE record itself was published on September 7, 2026. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 8, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-18453 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-18453 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.8% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (58th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-18453?
CVE-2026-18453 has a CVSS base score of 7.5 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-18453?
A fix for CVE-2026-18453 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-18453 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-18453

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-18453?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.