A vulnerability was found in zevorn rt-claw up to 0.2.0. The affected element is the function claw_net_get/claw_net_post of the file claw/services/tools/net.c of the component http_request. The manipulation of the argument url results in server-side request forgery. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.
CVE-2026-16125
Score 7.3 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2026-07-18. a secondary CVSS source baseline 7.3; sources differ by 0.0.
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.
- CVSS v3
- 7.3
- EG Score
- 7.3(high)
- EG Risk
- 64(Attend)EG Risk 64/100SSVC: Attend
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity73% × 45%Exploitation40% × 40%Automatability100% × 15%Action: Remediate soon — notable exploitation risk. - EPSS
- 20.9%
- KEV
- Not listed
Published
July 18, 2026
Last Modified
July 21, 2026
Advisory Details (2)
Auto-updated Jul 18, 2026GitHub - zevorn/rt-claw: Making AI Assistants Cheap Again! · GitHub
https://github.com/zevorn/rt-claw/[Security] Server-Side Request Forgery in rt-claw `http_request` AI tool allows internal network and localhost response disclosure · Issue #134 · zevorn/rt-claw · GitHub
https://github.com/zevorn/rt-claw/issues/134Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-16125(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 16× in last 7d / 16× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-07-24 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-23 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-23 03:05 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-22 23:57 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-22 23:57 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-22 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-21 04:38 UTCNVD updateCVSS v4 → 5.5
- 2026-07-21 03:31 UTCMITRE cvelistV5CVSS v4 → 6.9
- 2026-07-20 17:52 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-20 17:52 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-20 17:08 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-19 14:30 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-18 18:07 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-18 18:04 UTCNVD updateCVSS v4 → 5.5
- 2026-07-18 15:20 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-18 15:19 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Same CWE
10 shownCWE-918
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-16125?
When was CVE-2026-16125 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-16125 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-16125?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-16125?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-16125
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-16125?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.