CVE-2026-12171

HIGHPre-NVD 7.87.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

This high-severity CVE scores 7.8 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.2% (12th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.

Triggered by: Headline CVSS from a secondary CVSS source
Sources: EPSS, a secondary CVSS source
Elevated

Also known asEUVD-2026-92475 (ENISA EUVD)Source: ENISA EUVD

7.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS: 7.8Exploit: No code on recordExposed services: Not assessed

Upgrade to auto-changelog 2.6.1 or later (from the CVE record's solution, Harborist) — apply it.

auto-changelog before 2.6.1 merges configuration from inside the target repository (the .auto-changelog file and the auto-changelog key in package.json) into its options, and honors security-sensitive options from that untrusted source. The handlebarsSetup option is passed to require(), so running auto-changelog over attacker-controlled repository content (for example, in a CI workflow that checks out an untrusted pull request head, or locally on a forked or third-party repository) executes attacker-chosen code with the privileges of the invoking user or CI job, including access to workflow secrets, without the repository dependencies ever being installed. The plugins option similarly loads attacker-controlled modules from the repository. Under the same conditions, appendGitLog/appendGitTag allow git argument injection (e.g. --output= to write arbitrary files), output allows writing attacker-influenced content to arbitrary paths, and template causes an outbound request to an attacker-chosen URL. Version 2.6.1 treats in-repository configuration as untrusted and refuses to run when it sets these options, unless the new --unsafe-config flag is passed.

CVSS v3
7.8
EG Score
7.8HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
51
EG Risk 51/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity78% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 7.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation40% × 40%
EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: Upgrade to auto-changelog 2.6.1 or later (from the CVE record's solution, Harborist). Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
0.2%
EPSS %ILE
12th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (7.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 7.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
7.8 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.a secondary CVSS source · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
EG Likelihood
0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-27). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track* at medium mission impactTrack at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.

Upgrade to auto-changelog 2.6.1 or later (from the CVE record's solution, Harborist). Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

October 5, 2026

Last Modified

October 6, 2026

Advisory Details (2)

Auto-updated Oct 5, 2026
Fix named in the CVE record's solution (Harborist). Sources: github, github_commit.
GitHub commit

commit 1d02a48a0a57 (cookpete/auto-changelog)

Fix landed in cookpete/auto-changelog commit 1d02a48a0a57 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/cookpete/auto-changelog/commit/1d02a48a0a57c69a3cd268aca375d64d50877c1a
GitHub advisoryMentions a patch (unverified)

RCE via untrusted in-repo config (`handlebarsSetup` → `require()`) when run over attacker-controlled repo content (incl. CI on untrusted PRs) · Advisory · cookpete/auto-changelog · GitHub

https://github.com/cookpete/auto-changelog/security/advisories/GHSA-xpvr-2hvx-m8q4

Weakness Classification(5)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 8× in last 7d / 46× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

  1. 2026-11-01 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  2. 2026-10-31 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  3. 2026-10-30 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  4. 2026-10-29 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  5. 2026-10-28 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  6. 2026-10-27 20:45 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-27 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  8. 2026-10-26 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  9. 2026-10-25 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  10. 2026-10-25 14:49 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-24 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  12. 2026-10-23 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  13. 2026-10-22 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  14. 2026-10-21 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  15. 2026-10-20 19:08 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-10-20 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  17. 2026-10-19 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  18. 2026-10-18 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  19. 2026-10-18 05:04 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-10-17 18:52 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-10-17 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  22. 2026-10-16 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  23. 2026-10-15 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  24. 2026-10-14 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  25. 2026-10-13 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
Show 21 more
  1. 2026-10-12 16:36 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-12 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  3. 2026-10-11 20:12 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-11 18:24 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-11 14:58 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-11 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  7. 2026-10-11 03:26 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-10 19:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  9. 2026-10-10 03:33 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-09 20:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  11. 2026-10-09 03:47 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-08 17:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  13. 2026-10-08 03:59 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-07 23:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  15. 2026-10-06 16:20 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-10-06 15:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  17. 2026-10-05 20:26 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-10-05 19:22 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-10-05 17:28 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-10-05 16:32 UTCEG score recomputeFirst assessed: 7.8 HIGH
  21. 2026-10-05 16:31 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-12171?
CVE-2026-12171 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on October 5, 2026. auto-changelog before 2.6.1 merges configuration from inside the target repository (the .auto-changelog file and the auto-changelog key in package.json) into its options, and honors security-sensitive options from that untrusted source. The handlebarsSetup option is passed to require(), so running…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-12171 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-12171 was published on October 5, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 6, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-12171 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-12171 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (12th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-12171?
CVE-2026-12171 has a CVSS base score of 7.8 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-12171?
The CVE record's solution for CVE-2026-12171, written by its CNA Harborist, names the fix: "Upgrade to auto-changelog 2.6.1 or later."

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-12171

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-12171?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.