CVE-2026-118670

HIGHPre-NVD 8.88.8
EchelonGraph scoreLOW confidence

This high-severity CVE scores 8.8 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.4% (36th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.

Triggered by: Headline CVSS from a secondary CVSS source
Sources: a secondary CVSS source
Trending — 4 sources updated this week

Also known asEUVD-2026-118385 (ENISA EUVD)Source: ENISA EUVD

8.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.4%CVSS: 8.8Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

OHIF Viewers is a zero-footprint DICOM viewer with shared extension packages. From 3.5.0-beta.0 until 3.12.15, 3.13.7, and 3.14.0-beta.19, the dicom-pdf extension reads the attacker-controlled MIMETypeOfEncapsulatedDocument value in extensions/dicom-pdf/src/getSopClassHandlerModule.js and uses it as the Blob media type for the attacker-controlled EncapsulatedDocument bytes. When a victim opens Encapsulated PDF SOP Class 1.2.840.10008.5.1.4.1.1.104.1, extensions/dicom-pdf/src/viewports/OHIFCornerstonePdfViewport.tsx embeds the Blob URL in an object element. A Blob labeled as HTML is handled as HTML despite the application/pdf object hint, and the Blob inherits the OHIF origin, allowing embedded script to access session storage, authentication tokens, and same-origin PACS requests. The malicious DICOM object may be opened locally, uploaded to a shared PACS, or supplied by a DICOMweb source. This issue is fixed in source versions 3.12.15, 3.13.7, and 3.14.0-beta.19.

CVSS v3
8.8
EG Score
8.8HIGHlow confidence
EG Risk
40
EG Risk 40/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity88% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 8.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0% × 40%
No KEV listing, EG-KEV tier or EPSS when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at every mission impact level.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.4%
EPSS %ILE
36th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (8.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 8.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
8.8 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.a secondary CVSS source · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
EG Likelihood
0.4% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS. FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at every mission impact level.CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at every mission impact level.

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

November 6, 2026

Last Modified

November 6, 2026

Advisory Details (7)

Auto-updated Nov 6, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github, github_commit, github_pr, github_release.
GitHub release Patch Available

v3.13.7

Patch available: OHIF/Viewers v3.13.7

https://github.com/OHIF/Viewers/releases/tag/v3.13.7
GitHub release Patch Available

v3.12.15

Patch available: OHIF/Viewers v3.12.15

https://github.com/OHIF/Viewers/releases/tag/v3.12.15
GitHub commit

commit f0dba789a313 (OHIF/Viewers)

Fix landed in OHIF/Viewers commit f0dba789a313 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/OHIF/Viewers/commit/f0dba789a313f40fe7e8a8cbec322a8d8a491d76
GitHub commit Patch Available

commit ef0811c66cdb (OHIF/Viewers)

Patch available: OHIF/Viewers v3.14.0-beta.42 (contains commit ef0811c66cdb)

https://github.com/OHIF/Viewers/commit/ef0811c66cdb04ba07ffaba145cf66ce01486899
GitHub commit

commit db546701bd5f (OHIF/Viewers)

Fix landed in OHIF/Viewers commit db546701bd5f — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/OHIF/Viewers/commit/db546701bd5f2be9031c835f1de5c40aacd3dc62
GitHub pull request Patch Available

fix(dicom-pdf): guarantee the type of encapsulated documents

Patch available: OHIF/Viewers v3.14.0-beta.42 (PR #6228 merged 2026-09-03)

https://github.com/OHIF/Viewers/pull/6228
GitHub advisoryMentions a patch (unverified)

DOM-Based Cross Site Scripting (XSS) through MIME type of document · Advisory · OHIF/Viewers · GitHub

https://github.com/OHIF/Viewers/security/advisories/GHSA-xwgp-w3pj-q5h3

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 6× in last 7d / 6× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

  1. 2026-11-07 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
  2. 2026-11-06 18:27 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-11-06 18:04 UTCENISA EUVD ID recordedEUVD-2026-118385 · Source: ENISA EUVD
  4. 2026-11-06 17:53 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-11-06 17:33 UTCEG score recomputeFirst assessed: 8.8 HIGH
  6. 2026-11-06 17:32 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-118670?
CVE-2026-118670 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on November 6, 2026. OHIF Viewers is a zero-footprint DICOM viewer with shared extension packages. From 3.5.0-beta.0 until 3.12.15, 3.13.7, and 3.14.0-beta.19, the dicom-pdf extension reads the attacker-controlled MIMETypeOfEncapsulatedDocument value in extensions/dicom-pdf/src/getSopClassHandlerModule.js and uses it…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-118670 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-118670 was published on November 6, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of November 6, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-118670 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-118670 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.4% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (36th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-118670?
CVE-2026-118670 has a CVSS base score of 8.8 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending). The EG score is currently aggregating — additional source signals are being incorporated as they become available..
How do I remediate CVE-2026-118670?
A fix for CVE-2026-118670 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-118670

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-118670?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.