CVE-2026-115727

HIGHPre-NVD 8.18.1
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 8.1 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2026-10-23. The CNA's CVSS baseline 8.1; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: the CNA's CVSS, EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory
Trending — 3 sources updated this week

Also known asEUVD-2026-108715 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-r5cp-9ffr-m5mf (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

8.1EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan mitigationThe upstream fix is not in a release yet: until the release ships, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation on your normal schedule, then apply it (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.7%CVSS: 8.1Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

An upstream fix is merged but not yet released — mitigate (WAF / firewall / segmentation) until the release ships, then apply it.

AgenticSeek before commit 409840c contains a remote code execution vulnerability because llm_server/app.py hardcodes Flask debug mode while binding to all interfaces. Attackers who reach the server port and obtain the derivable Werkzeug debugger PIN can execute Python code and operating system commands with llm_server privileges.

CVSS v3
8.1
EG Score
8.1HIGHhigh confidence
EG Risk
37
EG Risk 37/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity81% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 8.1 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.7% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: An upstream fix is merged but not yet in a tagged release. Until the release ships, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation on your normal schedule, then apply it.
EPSS PROB
0.7%
EPSS %ILE
53rd
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (8.1): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 8.1 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
8.1 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.7% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-26). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.No released fix is confirmed on this page, but CISA's timeline does not wait for a fix's release: it starts when an agency identifies the flaw on an asset and updates the CDM Agency and Federal Dashboard, and the directive counts patching, decommissioning the system or another action as remediation. Until a fixed release is applied, mitigate as this page's verdict says. In the directive's words, “Fix on system upgrade” means that, “unless conditions change”, the vulnerability “should be remediated the next time the vulnerable asset receives a scheduled major upgrade or rebuild”: its timelines are “dynamic as facts change”, and a KEV listing shortens them.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

An upstream fix is merged but not yet in a tagged release. Until the release ships, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation on your normal schedule, then apply it.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

No released fix is confirmed on this page, but CISA's timeline does not wait for a fix's release: it starts when an agency identifies the flaw on an asset and updates the CDM Agency and Federal Dashboard, and the directive counts patching, decommissioning the system or another action as remediation. Until a fixed release is applied, mitigate as this page's verdict says. In the directive's words, “Fix on system upgrade” means that, “unless conditions change”, the vulnerability “should be remediated the next time the vulnerable asset receives a scheduled major upgrade or rebuild”: its timelines are “dynamic as facts change”, and a KEV listing shortens them.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

October 23, 2026

Last Modified

October 27, 2026

Advisory Details (4)

Auto-updated Oct 23, 2026
Upstream fix merged — awaiting tagged release. Sources: github_commit, github_pr.
Web page

AgenticSeek before commit 409840c RCE via Exposed Werkzeug Debugger in llm_server | Advisories | VulnCheck

https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/agenticseek-before-commit-409840c-rce-via-exposed-werkzeug-debugger-in-llm-server
Web page

agenticSeek/llm_server/app.py at d238f8e5de10e4ece40d93d80fb4daa4c8a2f34b · Fosowl/agenticSeek · GitHub

https://github.com/Fosowl/agenticSeek/blob/d238f8e5de10e4ece40d93d80fb4daa4c8a2f34b/llm_server/app.py#L52-L53
GitHub pull request

Security hardening, chat file upload, Files panel, browser login reuse and better error reporting

Fix merged in Fosowl/agenticSeek PR #558 on 2026-10-15 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/Fosowl/agenticSeek/pull/558
GitHub commit

commit 409840c03385 (Fosowl/agenticSeek)

Fix landed in Fosowl/agenticSeek commit 409840c03385 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/Fosowl/agenticSeek/commit/409840c033851d861c5c83a91c05fd4a2a75a096

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-115727(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 9× in last 7d / 18× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

  1. 2026-11-02 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  2. 2026-11-01 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  3. 2026-10-31 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  4. 2026-10-30 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  5. 2026-10-29 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  6. 2026-10-28 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  7. 2026-10-27 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  8. 2026-10-27 10:25 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-10-27 10:25 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r5cp-9ffr-m5mf · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  10. 2026-10-26 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  11. 2026-10-25 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  12. 2026-10-25 14:50 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-24 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 62nd percentile
  14. 2026-10-23 15:18 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-10-23 15:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r5cp-9ffr-m5mf · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  16. 2026-10-23 12:26 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-10-23 11:51 UTCEG score recomputeFirst assessed: 8.1 HIGH
  18. 2026-10-23 11:49 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-115727?
CVE-2026-115727 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on October 23, 2026. AgenticSeek before commit 409840c contains a remote code execution vulnerability because llm_server/app.py hardcodes Flask debug mode while binding to all interfaces. Attackers who reach the server port and obtain the derivable Werkzeug debugger PIN can execute Python code and operating system…
When was CVE-2026-115727 made public?
CVE-2026-115727 was made public on October 15, 2026: that is the date its CVE record's CNA, VulnCheck, gives for when the vulnerability was made public. The CVE record itself was published on October 23, 2026. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 27, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-115727 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-115727 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.7% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (53rd percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-115727?
CVE-2026-115727 has a CVSS base score of 8.1 (the CNA's own assessment, by vulncheck; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-115727?
An upstream fix for CVE-2026-115727 has been merged but is not yet in a tagged release. Until it ships, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation, then update to the release that contains the fix. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-115727 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-115727

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-115727?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.