CVE-2026-114129

MEDIUMPre-NVD 6.26.2
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 6.2 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: MODERATE) published 2026-10-22. A secondary CVSS source baseline 6.2; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, a secondary CVSS source
Trending — 3 sources updated this weekElevated

Also known asEUVD-2026-107412 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-jj87-hc4r-jwfw (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

6.2EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.3%CVSS: 6.2Exploit: No code on recordExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

stream-json is a micro-library of stream components for processing JSON and JSONC with a minimal memory footprint. From 2.0.0 until 3.7.0, FlexAssembler compiles string and regular-expression path filters into matchers that join the full key stack on every container start. Because the key stack grows with unbounded object or array nesting, a document nested to depth D causes D joins whose cost grows with the current depth, resulting in quadratic CPU consumption on the single-threaded event loop. The join occurs before the rule match decision, so the attacker does not need to know the target schema. Consumers using only function filters or no rules are not affected. A crafted nested document can stall all concurrent work in a process that feeds it to an affected FlexAssembler. This issue is fixed in 3.7.0, which adds a default maximum depth.

CVSS v3
6.2
EG Score
6.2MEDIUMhigh confidence
EG Risk
44
EG Risk 44/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity62% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 6.2 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation40% × 40%
EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.3%
EPSS %ILE
17th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (6.2): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 6.2 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
6.2 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.3% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-31). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

October 21, 2026

Last Modified

October 28, 2026

Advisory Details (3)

Auto-updated Oct 22, 2026
🔬 Proof of concept available. Patch available. Sources: github_commit, github.
GitHub advisoryMentions a patch (unverified)🟡 PoC Available

FlexAssembler string/RegExp path filters join the full key stack per container start, giving O(depth^2) CPU denial of service · Advisory · uhop/stream-json · GitHub

https://github.com/uhop/stream-json/security/advisories/GHSA-jj87-hc4r-jwfw
GitHub commit

commit c06c9a3c02ad (uhop/stream-json)

Fix landed in uhop/stream-json commit c06c9a3c02ad — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/uhop/stream-json/commit/c06c9a3c02adef89543e26ecebb45837cb284512
GitHub commit

commit 1929fd80495d (uhop/stream-json)

Fix landed in uhop/stream-json commit 1929fd80495d — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/uhop/stream-json/commit/1929fd80495d45b47e8f8cb1d4e132f915aef012

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-114129(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(1)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
npmstream-json @ 3.7.0 (fixes >= 2.0.0, <= 3.6.0)—ghsa

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
npm(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
stream-json—
  • 2.0.0 up to 3.7.0: fixed in 3.7.0
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 11× in last 7d / 20× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

  1. 2026-11-01 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  2. 2026-11-01 07:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jj87-hc4r-jwfw · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 6.2
  3. 2026-11-01 07:59 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-31 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  5. 2026-10-30 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  6. 2026-10-29 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  7. 2026-10-28 18:29 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-28 17:29 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-10-28 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  10. 2026-10-27 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  11. 2026-10-26 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  12. 2026-10-25 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  13. 2026-10-25 14:50 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-24 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  15. 2026-10-23 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  16. 2026-10-22 17:31 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-10-22 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  18. 2026-10-21 18:26 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-10-21 17:46 UTCEG score recomputeFirst assessed: 6.2 MEDIUM
  20. 2026-10-21 17:45 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Related CVEs(same product + same CWE)

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-114129?
CVE-2026-114129 is a medium-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on October 21, 2026. stream-json is a micro-library of stream components for processing JSON and JSONC with a minimal memory footprint. From 2.0.0 until 3.7.0, FlexAssembler compiles string and regular-expression path filters into matchers that join the full key stack on every container start. Because the key stack…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-114129 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-114129 was published on October 21, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 28, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-114129 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-114129 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.3% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (17th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-114129?
CVE-2026-114129 has a CVSS base score of 6.2 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-114129?
A fix for CVE-2026-114129 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-114129 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-114129

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-114129?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.

Book a Demo →Browse All CVEs