CVE-2026-111752

HIGHCVSS · not yet scored

Also known asGHSA-62vg-58rm-qff7 (GitHub Security Advisories)

—
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • No CVSS published and no exploitation signals yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: —CVSS v2: —Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fixed version is listed under Patch Availability — apply it.

@angular/router: Denial of Service via Unmatched Empty-Path Outlet Route Matching in Server-Side Rendering (SSR)

A denial of service (DoS) vulnerability was identified in @angular/router when Server-Side Rendering (SSR) is enabled on Node.js (V8).

During route recognition, @angular/router fails to validate whether an auxiliary outlet segment in the URL matches a route configured for that specific outlet name. Because unconfigured empty-path outlet groups (such as a:/(), x:/(...), or ///(...)) are not rejected during matching, the router repeatedly re-evaluates the route configuration against each arbitrary outlet segment provided in the URL.

When a request URL contains multiple arbitrary empty-path outlet segments, this improper matching forces the router to instantiate duplicate ActivatedRouteSnapshot trees, repeatedly execute canMatch guards and route resolvers, and allocate separate copies of route parameters and queryParams for each unconfigured outlet.

An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this behavior by sending requests with crafted outlet segments to exhaust the Node.js memory heap or overwhelm CPU resources, leading to SSR worker termination and service disruption.

Impact

Successful exploitation allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to exhaust the Node.js heap with a single crafted request or a small number of concurrent requests, terminating the SSR worker process with a fatal JavaScript heap out-of-memory crash. When the matched routes declare canMatch guards or resolvers, a single short request can also trigger repeated guard or resolver executions, increasing load on backend services and holding worker connections open.

* Transient Allocation: Memory is released once route recognition completes; there is no persistent memory leak. The primary impact is process termination. * Client-side SPAs Unaffected: Client-side Angular applications running in the browser are not vulnerable, as browser memory consumption does not cross a security boundary. * Prerendering (SSG) Unaffected: Build-time prerendering does not process attacker-supplied request URLs.

Attack Preconditions & Vulnerable Configurations

An application is affected only if all of the following conditions are met:

  • SSR Enabled: The application renders on demand on a Node.js / V8 server.
  • Susceptible Route Configuration: At least one level of the route configuration contains either:
* an empty-path (path: "") route (e.g., {path: "", component: ShopPage}), or * a route assigned to a named outlet (e.g., {path: "dashboard", children: [{path: ":id", outlet: "detail", component: DetailPanel}]}).
  • Upstream Request Line Forwarding: Request lines reach the Node.js process without being rejected upstream by edge proxies. Node.js accepts request headers up to 16 KiB by default. Guard/resolver amplification requires only a short URL.
  • Constrained Heap Size: Worker heaps are sized small enough relative to the request payload and concurrency (e.g., containers or serverless instances configured with 128 MiB–1 GiB).

Exploit Payload Examples

Against a configuration with empty-path (path: "") routes and query parameters:

GET /shop/(a:/()//b:/()//c:/()//...)?param1=value&param2=value... HTTP/1.1
Host: example.com

Against a configuration with named-outlet or sibling routes:

GET /dashboard/(detail:1//x:/(detail:1//x:/(...)//y:/(...))//y:/(...)) HTTP/1.1
Host: example.com

Patches

The issue is resolved in angular/angular#71055. The router now requires every child outlet segment group to match a route configured for its target outlet before unwrapping child segments or completing a match, and prevents unconfigured empty-path outlet groups from matching routes declared for other outlets.

Patched versions: * 22.2.1 * 21.2.25 * 20.3.33

Versions prior to v20 are also affected but are no longer supported and will not receive a patch.

Workarounds & Mitigations

If you cannot immediately upgrade to a patched version, apply one or more of the following mitigations:

  • Reject Parenthesized or Empty-Path Outlet URLs in Middleware or WAF (Recommended):
In @angular/router, auxiliary outlet groups in a URL always use parentheses (...), and empty-path outlet groups in a URL always take the form :/( , (/ , or ///( .

* If your application does not use named (auxiliary) outlets in URLs, reject requests whose path contains ( or ) before Angular SSR handles the request. * If your application does use named outlets, reject requests whose path contains empty-path outlet sequences (:/( , (/ , or ///( ).

Unlike URL length limits, this completely blocks both heap exhaustion and short-URL guard/resolver amplification:

// server.ts (placed before Angular SSR handler)
   app.use((req, res, next) => {
     let pathname: string;
     try {
       pathname = decodeURI(req.url.split(/[?#]/, 1)[0]);
     } catch {
       res.status(400).send("Bad Request");
       return;
     }

// Option A: If the app does not use named outlets in URLs, block all parenthesized groups: if (/[()]/.test(pathname)) { res.status(400).send("Bad Request"); return; }

// Option B: If the app uses named outlets, block only empty-path outlet groups: if (/:\/\(|\(\//\(|\/\/\/\(/.test(pathname)) { res.status(400).send("Bad Request"); return; }

next(); });

  • Limit URL Length at Reverse Proxy or Middleware:
Configure your edge proxy, web application firewall (WAF), or reverse proxy to reject requests with excessively long URLs (e.g., exceeding 2,048 bytes). The outlet portion of the payload is in the path, so limit the full request target, not only the query string. This reduces, but does not eliminate, guard/resolver amplification, which requires only a short URL.
  • Increase Node.js Old Space:
Increasing --max-old-space-size raises the request size and concurrency required to exhaust memory, though it does not eliminate the issue.

CVSS v3
—
EchelonGraph score
Not yet assessedNo source has published severity data for this CVE yet — no CVSS score from NVD or a CNA, no GitHub advisory, and it is not in CISA KEV. This is not a rating of zero; we cannot assess it yet.
EG Score
—
EG Risk
—
EPSS PROB
—
EPSS %ILE
—
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

EG Severity
Not assessed: no CVSS publishedA missing CVSS is not a severity of zero.
EG Likelihood
Unknown (no EPSS on record)Unknown, not low: FIRST has published no EPSS probability for this CVE.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
No SSVC decision: EchelonGraph has not assessed this CVECISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the BOD 26-04 block below.

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

October 20, 2026

Last Modified

October 20, 2026

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-111752(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(4)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
npm@angular/router @ 22.2.1 (fixes >= 22.0.0, < 22.2.1)—ghsa
npm@angular/router @ 21.2.25 (fixes >= 21.0.0, < 21.2.25)—ghsa
npm@angular/router @ 20.3.33 (fixes >= 20.0.0, < 20.3.33)—ghsa
npm@angular/router—ghsa

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Weakness Classification(2)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 1× in last 7d / 3× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

  1. 2026-11-01 07:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-62vg-58rm-qff7 · GitHub severity HIGH
  2. 2026-10-25 14:52 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-10-20 15:20 UTCEG score recompute

Frequently asked(3)

What is CVE-2026-111752?
CVE-2026-111752 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on October 20, 2026. @angular/router: Denial of Service via Unmatched Empty-Path Outlet Route Matching in Server-Side Rendering (SSR) A denial of service (DoS) vulnerability was identified in @angular/router when Server-Side Rendering (SSR) is enabled on Node.js (V8). During route recognition, @angular/router fails to…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-111752 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-111752 was published on October 20, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 20, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
How do I remediate CVE-2026-111752?
A fixed version for CVE-2026-111752 is listed under Patch Availability on this page: update to the version listed for your package. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-111752 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-111752

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-111752?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.