CVE-2026-110816

MEDIUMPre-NVD 5.35.3
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 5.3 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: MODERATE) published 2026-10-27. A secondary CVSS source baseline 5.3; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, a secondary CVSS source
Trending — 4 sources updated this weekElevated

Also known asEUVD-2026-101710 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-6pq8-jhm2-2vcw (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

5.3EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.4%CVSS: 5.3Exploit: No code on recordExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

Fixed versions, as the CVE record's CNA (Harborist) states them: "Upgrade to qs 6.16.1 or later."

Summary

qs.stringify with arrayFormat: 'comma' throws TypeError: Cannot convert object to primitive value when an array element cannot be coerced to a string, such as an object with an own non-callable toString ({ "toString": "x" }) or a null-prototype object. The comma format joins array elements with Array.prototype.join and, under encodeValuesOnly, first passes each element through String() in utils.encode; neither guards against an element whose string coercion fails.

Details

In lib/stringify.js, the comma branch collapses the array with obj.join(','). For an element whose own toString is not callable, ToPrimitive skips it, falls through to Object.prototype.valueOf (which returns the object itself), and throws. Under encodeValuesOnly: true, the same element first reaches String(str) in utils.encode (lib/utils.js) and throws there. Nested arrays ({ "a": [[{ "toString": "x" }]] }) throw the same way, through Array.prototype.toString. The indices, brackets, and repeat formats walk into object elements instead of coercing them, and are not affected.

Such elements can come from untrusted input. JSON.parse produces { "a": [{ "toString": "x" }] } with no qs option involved. qs.parse("a[0][toString]=x", { allowPrototypes: true }) keeps the toString key, and qs.parse("a[][b]=c", { plainObjects: true }) produces a null-prototype element; the default parse options drop toString and produce ordinary objects, which do not throw. Express 4's default query parser, Express 5's extended query parser, and body-parser's urlencoded({ extended: true }) all call qs.parse with allowPrototypes: true.

PoC

var qs = require("qs");

qs.stringify(JSON.parse("{\"a\":[{\"toString\":\"x\"}]}"), { arrayFormat: "comma" });

qs.stringify(qs.parse("a[0][toString]=x", { allowPrototypes: true }), { arrayFormat: "comma" });

qs.stringify(qs.parse("a[][b]=c", { plainObjects: true }), { arrayFormat: "comma", encodeValuesOnly: true });

// TypeError: Cannot convert object to primitive value

Fix

Applied in a952e75 on main and released as v6.16.1: an element whose string coercion would fail is coerced to its primitive valueOf, if any, or else to Object.prototype.toString, so it renders as [object Object], the same as any other object element already does under the comma format. Nested arrays are walked the way join walks them. Every input that did not previously throw serializes exactly as before, and a toString or valueOf that itself throws still propagates.

Affected versions

>=6.7.0 <6.16.1, fixed in v6.16.1.

The join path was introduced with the comma format in b84acba and first shipped in v6.7.0; v6.6.x and earlier ignore arrayFormat: 'comma' and are not affected. The encodeValuesOnly String() site was introduced in 4c4b23d (v6.11.1); before that, the same input throws at join. Every release from v6.7.0 through v6.16.0 is affected.

Impact

An unauthenticated request can make any code path that re-serializes attacker-influenced data with qs.stringify and arrayFormat: 'comma' (for example, rebuilding a query string from req.query for a redirect or an upstream request, or serializing a parsed JSON body) throw synchronously. In a typical Node.js HTTP framework the throw is caught by the framework error boundary and the affected request returns a 500; the process survives and other requests are unaffected. Where the call runs outside an error boundary, such as an async Express 4 handler (where the throw becomes an unhandled promise rejection) or a bare http request handler, the process exits, so the impact in that case depends on the application error handling rather than on qs. The default arrayFormat (indices) is not affected.

CVSS v3
5.3
EG Score
5.3MEDIUMhigh confidence
EG Risk
55
EG Risk 55/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity53% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 5.3 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation40% × 40%
EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
0.4%
EPSS %ILE
30th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (5.3): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 5.3 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
5.3 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.4% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-31). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

October 14, 2026

Last Modified

October 16, 2026

Advisory Details (2)

Auto-updated Oct 14, 2026
🔬 Proof of concept available. Patch available. Sources: github_commit, github.
GitHub advisoryMentions a patch (unverified)🟡 PoC Available

qs.stringify with arrayFormat 'comma' throws an uncaught TypeError on array elements carrying a non-callable own toString (DoS) · Advisory · ljharb/qs · GitHub

Affected: 6.16.1 (a952e75)

https://github.com/ljharb/qs/security/advisories/GHSA-6pq8-jhm2-2vcw
GitHub commit

commit a952e7519338 (ljharb/qs)

Fix landed in ljharb/qs commit a952e7519338 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/ljharb/qs/commit/a952e7519338ef0cfb25694a2988848f93333727

Patch Availability(3)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
redhatgrafana13-1-main-13.1.8-0.3.hum12026-10-21redhat
redhatgrafana13-2-main-13.2.3-0.3.hum12026-10-19redhat
npmqs @ 6.16.1 (fixes >= 6.7.0, <= 6.16.0)—ghsa

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
npm(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
qs—
  • 6.7.0 up to 6.16.1: fixed in 6.16.1
—

Weakness Classification(2)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 11× in last 7d / 33× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

  1. 2026-11-01 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
  2. 2026-11-01 08:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6pq8-jhm2-2vcw · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  3. 2026-11-01 08:00 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-31 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
  5. 2026-10-30 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
  6. 2026-10-29 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
  7. 2026-10-29 15:09 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-29 15:09 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-10-28 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
  10. 2026-10-27 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
  11. 2026-10-26 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
  12. 2026-10-25 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
  13. 2026-10-25 14:52 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-24 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
  15. 2026-10-23 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
  16. 2026-10-23 07:58 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-10-23 07:58 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-10-22 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
  19. 2026-10-21 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  20. 2026-10-20 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  21. 2026-10-19 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  22. 2026-10-18 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  23. 2026-10-18 05:05 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-10-17 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  25. 2026-10-16 21:45 UTCEG score recompute
Show 8 more
  1. 2026-10-16 20:33 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-16 20:23 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-10-16 20:13 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-16 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  5. 2026-10-15 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  6. 2026-10-14 22:32 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-14 22:15 UTCEG score recomputeFirst assessed: 5.3 MEDIUM
  8. 2026-10-14 22:13 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-110816?
CVE-2026-110816 is a medium-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on October 14, 2026. Summary qs.stringify with arrayFormat: 'comma' throws TypeError: Cannot convert object to primitive value when an array element cannot be coerced to a string, such as an object with an own non-callable toString ({ "toString": "x" }) or a null-prototype object. The comma format joins array elements…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-110816 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-110816 was published on October 14, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 16, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-110816 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-110816 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.4% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (30th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-110816?
CVE-2026-110816 has a CVSS base score of 5.3 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-110816?
A fix for CVE-2026-110816 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. Fixed versions, as the CVE record's CNA (Harborist) states them: "Upgrade to qs 6.16.1 or later." The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-110816 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-110816

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-110816?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.