Privasys rustls is a maintained fork of the rustls TLS library that adds RA-TLS challenge and channel-binding support. Prior to privasys-v0.8.1, the fork emitted RA-TLS challenge certificates whose quote ReportData was bound to the certificate public key and client nonce but not to the active TLS session. An attacker who obtained an enclave TLS private key could relay a genuine quote onto another connection, causing a relying party to accept an attacker-terminated connection as the attested enclave. This issue is fixed in privasys-v0.8.1.
CVE-2026-108266
“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.
This critical-severity CVE scores 9.1 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.1% (1st percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.
Also known asEUVD-2026-95997 (ENISA EUVD)Source: ENISA EUVD
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 9.1
- EG Score
- 9.1CRITICALmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 56EG Risk 56/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity91% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.1 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation0.1% × 40%FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.Automatability100% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high. - EPSS PROB
- 0.1%
- EPSS %ILE
- 1st
- KEV
- Not listed
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (9.1): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.1 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 9.1 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.a secondary CVSS source · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
- EG Likelihood
- 0.1% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-31). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
October 9, 2026
Last Modified
October 16, 2026
Advisory Details (4)
Auto-updated Oct 9, 2026Blog | Confidential Computing Is Not Broken: A Calm Look at the RA-TLS Attestation Flaw | Privasys
https://privasys.org/blog/binding-attestation-to-the-tls-sessionprivasys-v0.8.1 — RA-TLS challenge-response + session channel binding
Patch available: Privasys/rustls privasys-v0.8.1
https://github.com/Privasys/rustls/releases/tag/privasys-v0.8.1commit ab630583b58f (Privasys/rustls)
Patch available: Privasys/rustls privasys-v0.8.1 (contains commit ab630583b58f)
https://github.com/Privasys/rustls/commit/ab630583b58fee84260cbbfe2f4a8b45d8bde200Privasys rustls fork: RA-TLS challenge mode did not bind attestation evidence to the TLS session · Advisory · Privasys/rustls · GitHub
https://github.com/Privasys/rustls/security/advisories/GHSA-j6qv-435v-r492Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-108266(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 17× in last 7d / 57× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
- 2026-11-01 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
- 2026-11-01 16:00 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-11-01 16:00 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-31 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
- 2026-10-31 15:25 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-31 15:25 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-30 14:49 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-30 14:49 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-29 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
- 2026-10-29 14:12 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-29 14:12 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-28 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
- 2026-10-28 13:36 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-28 13:36 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-27 12:49 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-26 15:42 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-26 15:42 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-25 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
- 2026-10-25 15:06 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-25 14:54 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-24 14:28 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-24 14:28 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-23 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
- 2026-10-23 13:52 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-22 13:14 UTCEG score recompute
Show 32 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-21 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
- 2026-10-21 12:37 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-21 12:37 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-20 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
- 2026-10-19 17:58 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-19 17:58 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-19 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
- 2026-10-18 17:22 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-18 17:22 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-18 05:07 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 16:44 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
- 2026-10-16 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
- 2026-10-16 08:24 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-15 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
- 2026-10-15 07:32 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-15 07:32 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-14 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
- 2026-10-14 03:28 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-14 02:23 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-13 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
- 2026-10-12 16:38 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-12 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
- 2026-10-11 20:14 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 16:45 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 14:59 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 12:50 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-10 20:59 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-10 19:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
- 2026-10-09 21:20 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-09 21:06 UTCEG score recomputeFirst assessed: 9.1 CRITICAL
- 2026-10-09 21:05 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-108266?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-108266 published?
Is CVE-2026-108266 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-108266?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-108266?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-108266
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-108266?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.