Microsoft UFO is an open-source framework for intelligent automation across devices and platforms. Prior to 3.0.9, authenticated device registration through /api/devices can supply a permitted attacker-controlled WebSocket endpoint while aip/transport/websocket.py applies pinned_addresses only to the initial destination. The pinned websockets.connect() client follows cross-origin redirects and opens a new TCP connection before Galaxy performs its post-handshake peer-IP validation, allowing WebSocket upgrade requests to internal hosts reachable from the server. The confirmed impact is the internal connection and handshake request, and does not establish arbitrary HTTP methods, response-body disclosure, a completed AIP session, or cloud metadata access. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.9.
CVE-2026-105790
“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.
This medium-severity CVE scores 6.4 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.5% (45th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.
Also known asEUVD-2026-93407 (ENISA EUVD)Source: ENISA EUVD
- CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 6.4
- EG Score
- 6.4MEDIUMmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 45EG Risk 45/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity64% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 6.4 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation40% × 40%EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.Automatability0% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines. - EPSS PROB
- 0.5%
- EPSS %ILE
- 45th
- KEV
- Not listed
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (6.4): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 6.4 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 6.4 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.a secondary CVSS source · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
- EG Likelihood
- 0.5% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-24). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
October 6, 2026
Last Modified
October 6, 2026
Advisory Details (3)
Auto-updated Oct 6, 2026Fixed security issues.
Patch available: microsoft/UFO v3.0.9
https://github.com/microsoft/UFO/releases/tag/v3.0.9commit f31fb5ef7d07 (microsoft/UFO)
Patch available: microsoft/UFO v3.0.9 (contains commit f31fb5ef7d07)
https://github.com/microsoft/UFO/commit/f31fb5ef7d07b7825a03fe34b88f1f21cb5cfd35Authenticated Galaxy device registration can bypass WebSocket SSRF IP pinning via redirects · Advisory · microsoft/UFO · GitHub
https://github.com/microsoft/UFO/security/advisories/GHSA-3pgm-xw75-hq27Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 8× in last 7d / 43× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
- 2026-11-02 16:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 45th percentile
- 2026-11-01 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 45th percentile
- 2026-10-31 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 45th percentile
- 2026-10-31 11:55 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-10-30 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 45th percentile
- 2026-10-29 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 45th percentile
- 2026-10-28 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
- 2026-10-27 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
- 2026-10-26 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
- 2026-10-25 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
- 2026-10-25 14:55 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-24 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
- 2026-10-23 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
- 2026-10-23 09:13 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-22 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
- 2026-10-21 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
- 2026-10-20 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-10-19 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-10-18 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-10-18 05:08 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-10-16 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-10-15 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-10-14 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-10-13 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
Show 18 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-12 16:39 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-12 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-10-11 20:15 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 18:27 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 14:03 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-10-10 19:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-10-10 14:56 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-09 20:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-10-09 15:51 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-08 17:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-10-08 16:45 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-07 23:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-10-06 18:32 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-06 17:26 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-06 14:30 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-06 14:10 UTCEG score recomputeFirst assessed: 6.4 MEDIUM
- 2026-10-06 14:09 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-105790?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-105790 published?
Is CVE-2026-105790 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-105790?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-105790?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-105790
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-105790?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.