Vitess is a database clustering system for horizontal scaling of MySQL. Prior to 23.0.5 and 24.0.2, twopczHandler in go/vt/vttablet/tabletserver/twopcz.go writes the Action and dtid form values from the vttablet and vtcombo /twopcz HTTP debug endpoint into a text/html response without HTML escaping. Under the default allow-all ACL policy, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send an operator a crafted request that executes script in the operator's browser after the request is opened. The script runs with the vttablet debug origin and can read same-origin diagnostic endpoints that expose query, transaction, environment, variable, or profiling data available in that deployment. This issue is fixed in versions 23.0.5 and 24.0.2.
CVE-2026-104252
“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.
Score 9.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2026-10-15. A secondary CVSS source baseline 9.8; sources differ by 0.0.
Also known asEUVD-2026-100525 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-v75v-6fpf-gvw8 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 9.8
- EG Score
- 9.8CRITICALhigh confidence
- EG Risk
- 60EG Risk 60/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity98% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation1.2% × 40%FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.Automatability100% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high. - EPSS PROB
- 1.2%
- EPSS %ILE
- 67th
- KEV
- Not listed
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (9.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 9.8 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 1.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-31). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
October 13, 2026
Last Modified
October 23, 2026
Advisory Details (9)
Auto-updated Oct 30, 2026Vitess vttablet /twopcz reflected XSS · Advisory · vitessio/vitess · GitHub
Affected: v23.0.5 and v24.0.2 (
https://github.com/vitessio/vitess/security/advisories/GHSA-v75v-6fpf-gvw8Vitess v24.0.2
Patch available: vitessio/vitess v24.0.2
https://github.com/vitessio/vitess/releases/tag/v24.0.2Vitess v23.0.5
Patch available: vitessio/vitess v23.0.5
https://github.com/vitessio/vitess/releases/tag/v23.0.5[release-24.0] tabletserver: escape reflected form values in twopcz handler (#20255)
Fix merged in vitessio/vitess PR #20274 on 2026-06-09 — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/vitessio/vitess/pull/20274[release-23.0] tabletserver: escape reflected form values in twopcz handler (#20255)
Fix merged in vitessio/vitess PR #20273 on 2026-06-09 — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/vitessio/vitess/pull/20273tabletserver: escape reflected form values in twopcz handler
Fix merged in vitessio/vitess PR #20255 on 2026-06-09 — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/vitessio/vitess/pull/20255commit c1ed96302e65 (vitessio/vitess)
Fix landed in vitessio/vitess commit c1ed96302e65 — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/vitessio/vitess/commit/c1ed96302e658190168c971afdac730cf70e43f7commit 976e1e0d78f9 (vitessio/vitess)
Fix landed in vitessio/vitess commit 976e1e0d78f9 — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/vitessio/vitess/commit/976e1e0d78f9d29d02e5e31b4aa7e180648f08afcommit 3140c1846cd1 (vitessio/vitess)
Fix landed in vitessio/vitess commit 3140c1846cd1 — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/vitessio/vitess/commit/3140c1846cd120db34f33b2083139b4ab638aed2Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-104252(2)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Patch Availability(2)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fix (by version range) / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| go | vitess.io/vitess @ 0.23.5 (fixes < 0.23.5) | — | ghsa |
| go | vitess.io/vitess @ 0.24.2 (fixes >= 0.24.0, < 0.24.2) | — | ghsa |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Go(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| vitess.io/vitess | — |
| — |
Weakness Classification(3)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 21× in last 7d / 54× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
- 2026-11-01 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 67th percentile
- 2026-11-01 14:43 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-11-01 14:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-v75v-6fpf-gvw8 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-11-01 08:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-v75v-6fpf-gvw8 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-11-01 08:00 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-31 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 67th percentile
- 2026-10-31 14:53 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-31 14:53 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-30 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 67th percentile
- 2026-10-30 15:03 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-30 15:03 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-29 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 67th percentile
- 2026-10-29 15:14 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-29 15:14 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-28 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 67th percentile
- 2026-10-28 15:24 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-27 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 67th percentile
- 2026-10-27 15:34 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-27 15:34 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-26 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 67th percentile
- 2026-10-26 15:29 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-25 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 67th percentile
- 2026-10-25 15:08 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-25 14:56 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-24 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
Show 29 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-24 15:17 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-24 15:17 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-23 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
- 2026-10-23 15:06 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-22 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
- 2026-10-22 15:15 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-21 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
- 2026-10-21 15:23 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-21 15:23 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-20 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
- 2026-10-20 15:32 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-19 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
- 2026-10-19 15:42 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-19 15:42 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-18 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
- 2026-10-18 15:50 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-18 05:09 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
- 2026-10-17 15:58 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-16 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
- 2026-10-16 16:06 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-15 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
- 2026-10-15 16:27 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-15 15:23 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-15 00:39 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-14 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
- 2026-10-13 20:26 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-13 19:36 UTCEG score recomputeFirst assessed: 9.8 CRITICAL
- 2026-10-13 19:34 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Related CVEs(same product + same CWE)
Same product
7 shownGo:vitess.io/vitess
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-104252?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-104252 published?
Is CVE-2026-104252 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-104252?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-104252?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-104252
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-104252?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.