GPUStack is an open-source GPU cluster manager for AI model serving and GPU instance provisioning. From 0.7.1 until 2.2.2, the /auth/saml/callback endpoint decoded SAML XML, used its NameID and attributes to resolve or provision a user, and minted a gpustack_session JWT without calling OneLogin_Saml2_Auth.process_response to verify the signature, issuer, audience, destination, or time conditions. Any network client could submit an identity for an existing user, including an administrator, or provision a new non-administrator account, even when SAML was not configured. Response and Assertion identifiers were not consumed, so captured signed responses could also be replayed. This issue is fixed in version 2.2.2.
CVE-2026-102894
“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.
This critical-severity CVE scores 9.1 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.3% (17th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.
Also known asEUVD-2026-117125 (ENISA EUVD)Source: ENISA EUVD
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 9.1
- EG Score
- 9.1CRITICALmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 56EG Risk 56/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity91% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.1 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation0.3% × 40%FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.Automatability100% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high. - EPSS PROB
- 0.3%
- EPSS %ILE
- 17th
- KEV
- Not listed
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (9.1): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.1 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 9.1 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.a secondary CVSS source · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
- EG Likelihood
- 0.3% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-05). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
November 4, 2026
Last Modified
November 6, 2026
Advisory Details (6)
Auto-updated Nov 4, 2026v2.2.2
Patch available: gpustack/gpustack v2.2.2
https://github.com/gpustack/gpustack/releases/tag/v2.2.2commit adc6d82be34e (gpustack/gpustack)
Patch available: gpustack/gpustack v2.2.2 (contains commit adc6d82be34e)
https://github.com/gpustack/gpustack/commit/adc6d82be34e48390720a1361df616e2ea9d6d45commit 705edbe1b5fe (gpustack/gpustack)
Patch available: gpustack/gpustack v2.2.2rc1 (contains commit 705edbe1b5fe)
https://github.com/gpustack/gpustack/commit/705edbe1b5feec63959306daecd640e1c70eced2fix: gate SSO routes on the configured active provider
Patch available: gpustack/gpustack v2.2.2 (PR #5923 merged 2026-07-22)
https://github.com/gpustack/gpustack/pull/5923feat: auth source switch
Patch available: gpustack/gpustack v2.2.2rc1 (PR #5753 merged 2026-07-01)
https://github.com/gpustack/gpustack/pull/5753SAML callback trusts an unverified SAMLResponse, allowing authentication bypass and account takeover · Advisory · gpustack/gpustack · GitHub
https://github.com/gpustack/gpustack/security/advisories/GHSA-62m9-f875-rqw6Weakness Classification(2)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 12× in last 7d / 12× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
- 2026-11-06 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
- 2026-11-06 12:27 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-11-06 11:43 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-11-06 05:27 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-11-06 05:03 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-11-05 22:14 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-11-05 21:55 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-11-05 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
- 2026-11-04 22:27 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-11-04 22:03 UTCENISA EUVD ID recordedEUVD-2026-117125 · Source: ENISA EUVD
- 2026-11-04 21:26 UTCEG score recomputeFirst assessed: 9.1 CRITICAL
- 2026-11-04 21:25 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Same CWE
10 shownCWE-294 · CWE-347
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-102894?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-102894 published?
Is CVE-2026-102894 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-102894?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-102894?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-102894
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-102894?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.