Zulip is an open-source team collaboration tool. In Zulip Server versions through 12.1, GenericOpenIdConnectBackend matches the identity provider email claim to an active account's delivery_email without rejecting an explicitly false email_verified claim. If a configured identity provider returns an email address that the authenticating user does not control together with email_verified=false, Zulip can log the user into the existing account for that address. Exploitation requires a misconfigured trusted identity provider, and deployments whose authoritative identity provider only emits email addresses controlled by the authenticating user are not affected. This issue is fixed in version 12.2.
CVE-2026-102893
“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.
This critical-severity CVE scores 9.1 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.4% (33rd percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.
Also known asEUVD-2026-101287 (ENISA EUVD)Source: ENISA EUVD
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 9.1
- EG Score
- 9.1CRITICALmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 56EG Risk 56/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity91% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.1 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation0.4% × 40%FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.Automatability100% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high. - EPSS PROB
- 0.4%
- EPSS %ILE
- 33rd
- KEV
- Not listed
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (9.1): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.1 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 9.1 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.a secondary CVSS source · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
- EG Likelihood
- 0.4% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-31). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
October 14, 2026
Last Modified
October 16, 2026
Advisory Details (5)
Auto-updated Oct 14, 2026Zulip Server 12.2
Patch available: zulip/zulip 12.2
https://github.com/zulip/zulip/releases/tag/12.2commit b40f191a8c71 (zulip/zulip)
Fix landed in zulip/zulip commit b40f191a8c71 — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/zulip/zulip/commit/b40f191a8c71e74fcb471f71de6a1233de157102commit 68d2d9defa39 (zulip/zulip)
Patch available: zulip/zulip 12.2 (contains commit 68d2d9defa39)
https://github.com/zulip/zulip/commit/68d2d9defa39f8af96a50fc7430efc34dee120b512.2 patches for main
Fix merged in zulip/zulip PR #39913 on 2026-08-10 — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/zulip/zulip/pull/39913OpenID Connect authentication ignores the email_verified claim · Advisory · zulip/zulip · GitHub
https://github.com/zulip/zulip/security/advisories/GHSA-xw9h-9rcm-hx4mWeakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 13× in last 7d / 40× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
- 2026-11-01 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
- 2026-11-01 14:27 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-31 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
- 2026-10-31 14:09 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-30 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
- 2026-10-30 13:49 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-29 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
- 2026-10-29 13:27 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-28 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-10-28 13:08 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-27 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-10-26 22:25 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-26 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-10-25 19:11 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-25 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-10-25 14:56 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-24 18:32 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-24 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-10-23 18:14 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-23 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-10-22 17:46 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-22 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-10-21 17:23 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-21 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-10-20 16:46 UTCEG score recompute
Show 15 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-20 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-10-19 21:25 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-19 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-10-18 20:51 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-18 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-10-18 05:10 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 20:26 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-10-16 20:06 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-16 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-10-15 19:20 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-15 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-14 16:00 UTCEG score recomputeFirst assessed: 9.1 CRITICAL
- 2026-10-14 15:59 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-102893?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-102893 published?
Is CVE-2026-102893 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-102893?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-102893?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-102893
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-102893?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.