Russh is a Rust SSH client and server library. Prior to 0.63.0, the hybrid ML-KEM 768 and X25519 implementation in russh/src/kex/hybrid_mlkem.rs accepts an all-zero 32-byte peer X25519 public key in both server_dh and compute_shared_secret, forcing the X25519 contribution to the combined shared secret to zero. A malicious SSH peer can therefore make the combined secret depend only on ML-KEM, defeating the hybrid exchange's intended fallback protection if ML-KEM is later weakened. This issue is fixed in version 0.63.0.
CVE-2026-102824
“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.
Score 4.3 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: MODERATE) published 2026-09-30. A secondary CVSS source baseline 4.3; sources differ by 0.0.
Also known asEUVD-2026-89207 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-w3jg-pjxf-73p4 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD
- Lower severity and no public exploit yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 4.3
- EG Score
- 4.3MEDIUMmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 19EG Risk 19/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity43% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 4.3 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation0.1% × 40%FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.Automatability0% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at every mission impact level.Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines. - EPSS PROB
- 0.1%
- EPSS %ILE
- 3rd
- KEV
- Not listed
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (4.3): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 4.3 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 4.3 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 0.1% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-31). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at every mission impact level.CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at every mission impact level.
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
September 29, 2026
Last Modified
September 30, 2026
Advisory Details (3)
Auto-updated Sep 29, 2026v0.63.0
Patch available: Eugeny/russh v0.63.0
https://github.com/Eugeny/russh/releases/tag/v0.63.0commit 8da8967f1964 (Eugeny/russh)
Patch available: Eugeny/russh v0.63.0 (contains commit 8da8967f1964)
https://github.com/Eugeny/russh/commit/8da8967f196472576b1565d518a0ed60fce60f0cMissing X25519 zero-point validation in hybrid ML-KEM key exchange · Advisory · Eugeny/russh · GitHub
https://github.com/Eugeny/russh/security/advisories/GHSA-w3jg-pjxf-73p4Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-102824(2)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Patch Availability(2)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fix (by version range) / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| redhat | openshell-main-0.1.2-0.2.hum1 | 2026-10-01 | redhat |
| rust | russh @ 0.63.0 (fixes < 0.63.0) | — | ghsa |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(1 across 1 ecosystem)
crates.io(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| russh | — |
| — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 10× in last 7d / 59× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
- 2026-11-01 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
- 2026-11-01 08:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w3jg-pjxf-73p4 · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 4.3
- 2026-11-01 08:00 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-31 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
- 2026-10-31 12:25 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-10-30 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
- 2026-10-29 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
- 2026-10-28 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
- 2026-10-27 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
- 2026-10-26 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
- 2026-10-25 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
- 2026-10-25 14:56 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-24 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
- 2026-10-23 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
- 2026-10-23 09:28 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-23 09:28 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-22 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
- 2026-10-21 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
- 2026-10-20 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
- 2026-10-19 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
- 2026-10-18 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
- 2026-10-18 05:10 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
- 2026-10-16 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
- 2026-10-15 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
Show 44 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-14 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
- 2026-10-13 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
- 2026-10-12 16:40 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-12 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
- 2026-10-11 22:32 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-11 20:16 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 18:28 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 15:01 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
- 2026-10-11 00:27 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 00:27 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-10 19:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
- 2026-10-10 02:19 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-10 02:19 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-09 20:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
- 2026-10-09 04:15 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-09 04:15 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-08 17:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
- 2026-10-08 06:11 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-08 06:11 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-07 23:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
- 2026-10-07 08:07 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-07 08:07 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-06 15:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
- 2026-10-06 10:03 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-06 10:03 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-05 17:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
- 2026-10-05 11:54 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-05 11:54 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-04 23:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
- 2026-10-04 13:50 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-03 15:46 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-03 15:46 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-03 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
- 2026-10-02 17:36 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-02 17:36 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-01 19:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
- 2026-09-30 21:29 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-30 20:27 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-30 17:24 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-30 15:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
- 2026-09-29 19:20 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-29 18:29 UTCEG score recomputeFirst assessed: 4.3 MEDIUM
- 2026-09-29 18:28 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Related CVEs(same product + same vendor + same CWE)
Same product
10 showncrates.io:russh
Same vendor
3 shownredhat:RHSA-2026:74586
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-102824?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-102824 published?
Is CVE-2026-102824 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-102824?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-102824?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-102824
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-102824?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.