CVE-2026-100373

MEDIUMPre-NVD 4.14.1
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 4.1 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2026-09-25. A secondary CVSS source baseline 4.1; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, a secondary CVSS source
Elevated

Also known asEUVD-2026-87316 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-2qh3-cv3f-wh5h (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

4.1EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan mitigationThe upstream fix is not in a release yet: until the release ships, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation on your normal schedule, then apply it (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.3%CVSS: 4.1Exploit: No code on recordExposed services: Not assessed

An upstream fix is merged but not yet released — mitigate (WAF / firewall / segmentation) until the release ships, then apply it.

OpenMetadata through 2.0.2 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the URLValidator.validateURL function that fails to properly resolve DNS hostnames and validate internal addresses. Users permitted to create or update EventSubscription can set webhook destinations to internal hosts, allowing the server to send requests to private networks and cloud metadata endpoints while returning HTTP status codes that enable blind SSRF probing.

CVSS v3
4.1
EG Score
4.1MEDIUMmedium confidence
EG Risk
34
EG Risk 34/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity41% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 4.1 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation40% × 40%
EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: An upstream fix is merged but not yet in a tagged release. Until the release ships, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation on your normal schedule, then apply it.
EPSS PROB
0.3%
EPSS %ILE
18th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (4.1): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 4.1 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
4.1 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.3% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-25). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.No released fix is confirmed on this page, but CISA's timeline does not wait for a fix's release: it starts when an agency identifies the flaw on an asset and updates the CDM Agency and Federal Dashboard, and the directive counts patching, decommissioning the system or another action as remediation. Until a fixed release is applied, mitigate as this page's verdict says. In the directive's words, “Fix on system upgrade” means that, “unless conditions change”, the vulnerability “should be remediated the next time the vulnerable asset receives a scheduled major upgrade or rebuild”: its timelines are “dynamic as facts change”, and a KEV listing shortens them.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

An upstream fix is merged but not yet in a tagged release. Until the release ships, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation on your normal schedule, then apply it.

Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

No released fix is confirmed on this page, but CISA's timeline does not wait for a fix's release: it starts when an agency identifies the flaw on an asset and updates the CDM Agency and Federal Dashboard, and the directive counts patching, decommissioning the system or another action as remediation. Until a fixed release is applied, mitigate as this page's verdict says. In the directive's words, “Fix on system upgrade” means that, “unless conditions change”, the vulnerability “should be remediated the next time the vulnerable asset receives a scheduled major upgrade or rebuild”: its timelines are “dynamic as facts change”, and a KEV listing shortens them.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

September 25, 2026

Last Modified

September 25, 2026

Advisory Details (6)

Auto-updated Sep 25, 2026
Upstream fix merged — awaiting tagged release. Sources: github_commit.
Web page

OpenMetadata through 2.0.2 SSRF via Webhook URL Validation Bypass | Advisories | VulnCheck

https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/openmetadata-through-2.0.2-ssrf-via-webhook-url-validation-bypass
Web page

GitHub - open-metadata/OpenMetadata: The Open Context Layer for Data and AI , OpenMetadata is the open platform for building trusted data context and business semantics for humans, AI assistants, and agents. · GitHub

https://github.com/open-metadata/OpenMetadata
Web page

OpenMetadata/openmetadata-service/src/main/java/org/openmetadata/service/util/URLValidator.java at 2.0.2-release · open-metadata/OpenMetadata · GitHub

https://github.com/open-metadata/OpenMetadata/blob/2.0.2-release/openmetadata-service/src/main/java/org/openmetadata/service/util/URLValidator.java#L34-L47
GitHub commit

commit 8f44482ac89b (open-metadata/OpenMetadata)

Fix landed in open-metadata/OpenMetadata commit 8f44482ac89b — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/open-metadata/OpenMetadata/commit/8f44482ac89bad9227df5b7f79beca2efe50c05f
Web page

Outbound URL policy is enforced inconsistently across webhook paths · Issue #32592 · open-metadata/OpenMetadata · GitHub

https://github.com/open-metadata/OpenMetadata/issues/32592
Web page

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in OpenMetadata EventSubscription Webhooks · GitHub

https://gist.github.com/naif-alfardan/8a69e0648e11b07abe63f949346179c1

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-100373(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 7× in last 7d / 54× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

  1. 2026-11-01 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  2. 2026-10-31 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  3. 2026-10-30 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  4. 2026-10-29 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  5. 2026-10-28 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  6. 2026-10-27 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  7. 2026-10-26 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  8. 2026-10-25 21:41 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-10-25 21:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2qh3-cv3f-wh5h · GitHub CVSS 4.1
  10. 2026-10-25 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  11. 2026-10-25 15:58 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-24 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  13. 2026-10-23 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  14. 2026-10-23 09:54 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-10-23 09:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2qh3-cv3f-wh5h · GitHub CVSS 4.1
  16. 2026-10-22 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  17. 2026-10-21 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  18. 2026-10-20 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  19. 2026-10-19 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  20. 2026-10-18 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  21. 2026-10-18 05:11 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-10-17 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  23. 2026-10-16 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  24. 2026-10-15 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  25. 2026-10-14 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
Show 53 more
  1. 2026-10-13 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  2. 2026-10-12 16:42 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-10-12 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  4. 2026-10-12 01:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2qh3-cv3f-wh5h · GitHub CVSS 4.1
  5. 2026-10-11 20:17 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-11 18:29 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-11 15:03 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-11 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  9. 2026-10-10 23:26 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-10 23:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2qh3-cv3f-wh5h · GitHub CVSS 4.1
  11. 2026-10-10 19:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  12. 2026-10-09 21:46 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-09 21:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2qh3-cv3f-wh5h · GitHub CVSS 4.1
  14. 2026-10-09 20:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  15. 2026-10-08 20:07 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-10-08 20:07 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2qh3-cv3f-wh5h · GitHub CVSS 4.1
  17. 2026-10-08 17:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  18. 2026-10-07 23:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  19. 2026-10-07 17:35 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-10-07 17:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2qh3-cv3f-wh5h · GitHub CVSS 4.1
  21. 2026-10-06 15:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  22. 2026-10-06 13:59 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-10-06 13:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2qh3-cv3f-wh5h · GitHub CVSS 4.1
  24. 2026-10-05 17:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  25. 2026-10-05 12:20 UTCEG score recompute
  26. 2026-10-05 12:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2qh3-cv3f-wh5h · GitHub CVSS 4.1
  27. 2026-10-04 23:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  28. 2026-10-04 10:40 UTCEG score recompute
  29. 2026-10-04 10:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2qh3-cv3f-wh5h · GitHub CVSS 4.1
  30. 2026-10-03 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  31. 2026-10-03 08:59 UTCEG score recompute
  32. 2026-10-03 08:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2qh3-cv3f-wh5h · GitHub CVSS 4.1
  33. 2026-10-02 07:15 UTCEG score recompute
  34. 2026-10-02 07:15 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2qh3-cv3f-wh5h · GitHub CVSS 4.1
  35. 2026-10-01 19:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  36. 2026-10-01 05:36 UTCEG score recompute
  37. 2026-10-01 05:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2qh3-cv3f-wh5h · GitHub CVSS 4.1
  38. 2026-09-30 15:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  39. 2026-09-30 03:57 UTCEG score recompute
  40. 2026-09-30 03:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2qh3-cv3f-wh5h · GitHub CVSS 4.1
  41. 2026-09-29 15:20 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  42. 2026-09-29 02:19 UTCEG score recompute
  43. 2026-09-29 02:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2qh3-cv3f-wh5h · GitHub CVSS 4.1
  44. 2026-09-28 13:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  45. 2026-09-28 00:38 UTCEG score recompute
  46. 2026-09-28 00:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2qh3-cv3f-wh5h · GitHub CVSS 4.1
  47. 2026-09-26 22:58 UTCEG score recompute
  48. 2026-09-26 22:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2qh3-cv3f-wh5h · GitHub CVSS 4.1
  49. 2026-09-26 15:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  50. 2026-09-25 21:19 UTCEG score recompute
  51. 2026-09-25 20:37 UTCEG score recompute
  52. 2026-09-25 19:46 UTCEG score recomputeFirst assessed: 4.1 MEDIUM
  53. 2026-09-25 19:45 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-100373?
CVE-2026-100373 is a medium-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on September 25, 2026. OpenMetadata through 2.0.2 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the URLValidator.validateURL function that fails to properly resolve DNS hostnames and validate internal addresses. Users permitted to create or update EventSubscription can set webhook destinations to internal…
When was CVE-2026-100373 made public?
CVE-2026-100373 was made public on September 21, 2026: that is the date its CVE record's CNA, VulnCheck, gives for when the vulnerability was made public. The CVE record itself was published on September 25, 2026. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of September 25, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-100373 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-100373 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.3% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (18th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-100373?
CVE-2026-100373 has a CVSS base score of 4.1 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-100373?
An upstream fix for CVE-2026-100373 has been merged but is not yet in a tagged release. Until it ships, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation, then update to the release that contains the fix. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-100373 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-100373

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-100373?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.