DOMSanitizer is a DOM/SVG/MathML Sanitizer for PHP 7.3+. Prior to version 1.0.15, the isDangerousUrl() method is responsible for rejecting dangerous URL values in the href and xlink:href attributes. The weakness is that "javascript:" is rejected as a scheme, while "data:" is rejected only when the literal substring onload appears in the URL value (/^data:.*onload/i). Because data: payloads are routinely Base64-encoded, the dangerous content (, event handlers, etc.) is invisible to that substring test. A URL such as data:text/html;base64,… therefore survives in href / xlink:href, even though the decoded payload is active markup. This is an incomplete input-validation / sanitization defect in the sanitizer itself. This issue has been patched in version 1.0.15.
CVE-2026-100370
“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.
This medium-severity CVE scores 4.7 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.3% (19th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.
Also known asEUVD-2026-88477 (ENISA EUVD)Source: ENISA EUVD
- CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 4.7
- EG Score
- 4.7MEDIUMmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 37EG Risk 37/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity47% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 4.7 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation40% × 40%EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.Automatability0% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines. - EPSS PROB
- 0.3%
- EPSS %ILE
- 19th
- KEV
- Not listed
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (4.7): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 4.7 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 4.7 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.a secondary CVSS source · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
- EG Likelihood
- 0.3% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-24). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
September 28, 2026
Last Modified
September 30, 2026
Advisory Details (4)
Auto-updated Sep 28, 20261.0.15
Patch available: rhukster/dom-sanitizer 1.0.15
https://github.com/rhukster/dom-sanitizer/releases/tag/1.0.15commit fb8f758b4113 (rhukster/dom-sanitizer)
Patch available: rhukster/dom-sanitizer 1.0.15 (contains commit fb8f758b4113)
https://github.com/rhukster/dom-sanitizer/commit/fb8f758b41134fc5fb2f563666f2330c69e31f94commit 10f97807e450 (rhukster/dom-sanitizer)
Patch available: rhukster/dom-sanitizer 1.0.15 (contains commit 10f97807e450)
https://github.com/rhukster/dom-sanitizer/commit/10f97807e4501d60f63987f2e76a38cdbf312dcbIncomplete data: URL Sanitization in DOMSanitizer::isDangerousUrl() Allows Base64-Encoded Payloads to Bypass href and xlink:href Validation · Advisory · rhukster/dom-sanitizer · GitHub
https://github.com/rhukster/dom-sanitizer/security/advisories/GHSA-wcj2-r6vg-rm97Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 8× in last 7d / 43× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
- 2026-11-01 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
- 2026-10-31 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
- 2026-10-31 12:55 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-10-30 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
- 2026-10-29 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
- 2026-10-28 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
- 2026-10-27 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
- 2026-10-26 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
- 2026-10-25 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
- 2026-10-25 15:58 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-24 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
- 2026-10-23 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
- 2026-10-23 09:54 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-22 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
- 2026-10-21 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
- 2026-10-20 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
- 2026-10-19 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
- 2026-10-18 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
- 2026-10-18 05:11 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
- 2026-10-16 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
- 2026-10-15 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
- 2026-10-14 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
- 2026-10-13 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
- 2026-10-12 16:42 UTCEG score recompute
Show 29 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-12 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
- 2026-10-11 19:34 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 18:29 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 15:03 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
- 2026-10-10 19:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
- 2026-10-10 19:41 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-09 20:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
- 2026-10-08 19:53 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-08 17:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
- 2026-10-06 19:22 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-06 15:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
- 2026-10-05 19:29 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-05 17:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
- 2026-10-04 23:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
- 2026-10-03 19:42 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-03 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
- 2026-10-02 19:49 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-01 19:55 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-01 19:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
- 2026-09-30 20:02 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-30 15:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
- 2026-09-29 23:45 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-29 15:20 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
- 2026-09-28 21:18 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-28 20:46 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-28 20:26 UTCEG score recomputeFirst assessed: 4.7 MEDIUM
- 2026-09-28 20:26 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-100370?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-100370 published?
Is CVE-2026-100370 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-100370?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-100370?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-100370
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-100370?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.