In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
RDMA/irdma: avoid invalid read in irdma_net_event
irdma_net_event() should not dereference anything from "neigh" (alias
"ptr") until it has checked that the event is NETEVENT_NEIGH_UPDATE.
Other events come with different structures pointed to by "ptr" and they
may be smaller than struct neighbour.
Move the read of neigh->dev under the NETEVENT_NEIGH_UPDATE case.
The bug is mostly harmless, but it triggers KASAN on debug kernels:
BUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in irdma_net_event+0x32e/0x3b0 [irdma]
Read of size 8 at addr ffffc900075e07f0 by task kworker/27:2/542554
CPU: 27 PID: 542554 Comm: kworker/27:2 Kdump: loaded Not tainted 5.14.0-630.el9.x86_64+debug #1
Hardware name: [...]
Workqueue: events rt6_probe_deferred
Call Trace:
dump_stack_lvl+0x60/0xb0
print_address_description.constprop.0+0x2c/0x3f0
print_report+0xb4/0x270
kasan_report+0x92/0xc0
irdma_net_event+0x32e/0x3b0 [irdma]
notifier_call_chain+0x9e/0x180
atomic_notifier_call_chain+0x5c/0x110
rt6_do_redirect+0xb91/0x1080
tcp_v6_err+0xe9b/0x13e0
icmpv6_notify+0x2b2/0x630
ndisc_redirect_rcv+0x328/0x530
icmpv6_rcv+0xc16/0x1360
ip6_protocol_deliver_rcu+0xb84/0x12e0
ip6_input_finish+0x117/0x240
ip6_input+0xc4/0x370
ipv6_rcv+0x420/0x7d0
__netif_receive_skb_one_core+0x118/0x1b0
process_backlog+0xd1/0x5d0
__napi_poll.constprop.0+0xa3/0x440
net_rx_action+0x78a/0xba0
handle_softirqs+0x2d4/0x9c0
do_softirq+0xad/0xe0
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (7.1): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 7.1 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 7.1 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-27). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at every mission impact level.CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at every mission impact level.
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it